Differences in the Endophytic Microbiome of Olive Cultivars Infected by <i>Xylella Fastidiosa</i> across Seasons

The dynamics of <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i> infections in the context of the endophytic microbiome was studied in field-grown plants of the susceptible and resistant olive cultivars Kalamata and FS17. Whole metagenome shotgun sequencing (WMSS) coupled with 16S/ITS rRNA gene sequencing was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annalisa Giampetruzzi, Paula Baptista, Massimiliano Morelli, Cristina Cameirão, Teresa Lino Neto, Daniela Costa, Giusy D’Attoma, Raied Abou Kubaa, Giuseppe Altamura, Maria Saponari, José Alberto Pereira, Pasquale Saldarelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Pathogens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/9/723
id doaj-51c5e2c5d122448598c39ec3342617ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51c5e2c5d122448598c39ec3342617ad2020-11-25T01:25:10ZengMDPI AGPathogens2076-08172020-09-01972372310.3390/pathogens9090723Differences in the Endophytic Microbiome of Olive Cultivars Infected by <i>Xylella Fastidiosa</i> across SeasonsAnnalisa Giampetruzzi0Paula Baptista1Massimiliano Morelli2Cristina Cameirão3Teresa Lino Neto4Daniela Costa5Giusy D’Attoma6Raied Abou Kubaa7Giuseppe Altamura8Maria Saponari9José Alberto Pereira10Pasquale Saldarelli11Dipartimento di Scienze del Suolo, della Pianta e degli Alimenti, Università degli Studi di Bari, 70126 Bari, ItalyCentro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Campus de Santa Apolónia, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, PortugalConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Sede Secondaria di Bari, 70126 Bari, ItalyCentro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Campus de Santa Apolónia, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, PortugalBiosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Plant Functional Biology Center (CBFP), Campus de Gualtar, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, PortugalBiosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Plant Functional Biology Center (CBFP), Campus de Gualtar, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, PortugalConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Sede Secondaria di Bari, 70126 Bari, ItalyConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Sede Secondaria di Bari, 70126 Bari, ItalyConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Sede Secondaria di Bari, 70126 Bari, ItalyConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Sede Secondaria di Bari, 70126 Bari, ItalyCentro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Campus de Santa Apolónia, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, PortugalConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Sede Secondaria di Bari, 70126 Bari, ItalyThe dynamics of <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i> infections in the context of the endophytic microbiome was studied in field-grown plants of the susceptible and resistant olive cultivars Kalamata and FS17. Whole metagenome shotgun sequencing (WMSS) coupled with 16S/ITS rRNA gene sequencing was carried out on the same trees at two different stages of the infections: In Spring 2017 when plants were almost symptomless and in Autumn 2018 when the trees of the susceptible cultivar clearly showed desiccations. The progression of the infections detected in both cultivars clearly unraveled that <i>Xylella</i> tends to occupy the whole ecological niche and suppresses the diversity of the endophytic microbiome. However, this trend was mitigated in the resistant cultivar FS17, harboring lower population sizes and therefore lower <i>Xylella</i> average abundance ratio over total bacteria, and a higher a-diversity. Host cultivar had a negligible effect on the community composition and no clear associations of a single taxon or microbial consortia with the resistance cultivar were found with both sequencing approaches, suggesting that the mechanisms of resistance likely reside on factors that are independent of the microbiome structure. Overall, <i>Proteobacteria</i>, <i>Actinobacteria</i>, <i>Firmicutes</i>, and <i>Bacteriodetes</i> dominated the bacterial microbiome while <i>Ascomycota</i> and <i>Basidiomycota</i> those of Fungi.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/9/723<i>Xylella fastidiosa</i>bacteriafungiarchaea16S/ITS sequencingshotgun metagenomic sequencing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annalisa Giampetruzzi
Paula Baptista
Massimiliano Morelli
Cristina Cameirão
Teresa Lino Neto
Daniela Costa
Giusy D’Attoma
Raied Abou Kubaa
Giuseppe Altamura
Maria Saponari
José Alberto Pereira
Pasquale Saldarelli
spellingShingle Annalisa Giampetruzzi
Paula Baptista
Massimiliano Morelli
Cristina Cameirão
Teresa Lino Neto
Daniela Costa
Giusy D’Attoma
Raied Abou Kubaa
Giuseppe Altamura
Maria Saponari
José Alberto Pereira
Pasquale Saldarelli
Differences in the Endophytic Microbiome of Olive Cultivars Infected by <i>Xylella Fastidiosa</i> across Seasons
Pathogens
<i>Xylella fastidiosa</i>
bacteria
fungi
archaea
16S/ITS sequencing
shotgun metagenomic sequencing
author_facet Annalisa Giampetruzzi
Paula Baptista
Massimiliano Morelli
Cristina Cameirão
Teresa Lino Neto
Daniela Costa
Giusy D’Attoma
Raied Abou Kubaa
Giuseppe Altamura
Maria Saponari
José Alberto Pereira
Pasquale Saldarelli
author_sort Annalisa Giampetruzzi
title Differences in the Endophytic Microbiome of Olive Cultivars Infected by <i>Xylella Fastidiosa</i> across Seasons
title_short Differences in the Endophytic Microbiome of Olive Cultivars Infected by <i>Xylella Fastidiosa</i> across Seasons
title_full Differences in the Endophytic Microbiome of Olive Cultivars Infected by <i>Xylella Fastidiosa</i> across Seasons
title_fullStr Differences in the Endophytic Microbiome of Olive Cultivars Infected by <i>Xylella Fastidiosa</i> across Seasons
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the Endophytic Microbiome of Olive Cultivars Infected by <i>Xylella Fastidiosa</i> across Seasons
title_sort differences in the endophytic microbiome of olive cultivars infected by <i>xylella fastidiosa</i> across seasons
publisher MDPI AG
series Pathogens
issn 2076-0817
publishDate 2020-09-01
description The dynamics of <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i> infections in the context of the endophytic microbiome was studied in field-grown plants of the susceptible and resistant olive cultivars Kalamata and FS17. Whole metagenome shotgun sequencing (WMSS) coupled with 16S/ITS rRNA gene sequencing was carried out on the same trees at two different stages of the infections: In Spring 2017 when plants were almost symptomless and in Autumn 2018 when the trees of the susceptible cultivar clearly showed desiccations. The progression of the infections detected in both cultivars clearly unraveled that <i>Xylella</i> tends to occupy the whole ecological niche and suppresses the diversity of the endophytic microbiome. However, this trend was mitigated in the resistant cultivar FS17, harboring lower population sizes and therefore lower <i>Xylella</i> average abundance ratio over total bacteria, and a higher a-diversity. Host cultivar had a negligible effect on the community composition and no clear associations of a single taxon or microbial consortia with the resistance cultivar were found with both sequencing approaches, suggesting that the mechanisms of resistance likely reside on factors that are independent of the microbiome structure. Overall, <i>Proteobacteria</i>, <i>Actinobacteria</i>, <i>Firmicutes</i>, and <i>Bacteriodetes</i> dominated the bacterial microbiome while <i>Ascomycota</i> and <i>Basidiomycota</i> those of Fungi.
topic <i>Xylella fastidiosa</i>
bacteria
fungi
archaea
16S/ITS sequencing
shotgun metagenomic sequencing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/9/723
work_keys_str_mv AT annalisagiampetruzzi differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT paulabaptista differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT massimilianomorelli differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT cristinacameirao differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT teresalinoneto differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT danielacosta differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT giusydattoma differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT raiedaboukubaa differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT giuseppealtamura differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT mariasaponari differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT josealbertopereira differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
AT pasqualesaldarelli differencesintheendophyticmicrobiomeofolivecultivarsinfectedbyixylellafastidiosaiacrossseasons
_version_ 1725114833256316928