Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology

Abstract Animal movement studies are conducted to monitor ecosystem health, understand ecological dynamics, and address management and conservation questions. In marine environments, traditional sampling and monitoring methods to measure animal movement are invasive, labor intensive, costly, and lim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Lopez‐Marcano, Eric L.Jinks, Christina A. Buelow, Christopher J. Brown, Dadong Wang, Branislav Kusy, Ellen M.Ditria, Rod M. Connolly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-06-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7656
id doaj-51bc38d6d3de463cb162e1d2f55f6940
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51bc38d6d3de463cb162e1d2f55f69402021-06-22T01:41:53ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582021-06-0111128254826310.1002/ece3.7656Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecologySebastian Lopez‐Marcano0Eric L.Jinks1Christina A. Buelow2Christopher J. Brown3Dadong Wang4Branislav Kusy5Ellen M.Ditria6Rod M. Connolly7Coastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaCoastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaCoastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaCoastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaQuantitative Imaging Research Team CSIRO Marsfield NSW AustraliaData61 CSIRO Pullenvale QLD AustraliaCoastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaCoastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaAbstract Animal movement studies are conducted to monitor ecosystem health, understand ecological dynamics, and address management and conservation questions. In marine environments, traditional sampling and monitoring methods to measure animal movement are invasive, labor intensive, costly, and limited in the number of individuals that can be feasibly tracked. Automated detection and tracking of small‐scale movements of many animals through cameras are possible but are largely untested in field conditions, hampering applications to ecological questions. Here, we aimed to test the ability of an automated object detection and object tracking pipeline to track small‐scale movement of many individuals in videos. We applied the pipeline to track fish movement in the field and characterize movement behavior. We automated the detection of a common fisheries species (yellowfin bream, Acanthopagrus australis) along a known movement passageway from underwater videos. We then tracked fish movement with three types of tracking algorithms (MOSSE, Seq‐NMS, and SiamMask) and evaluated their accuracy at characterizing movement. We successfully detected yellowfin bream in a multispecies assemblage (F1 score =91%). At least 120 of the 169 individual bream present in videos were correctly identified and tracked. The accuracies among the three tracking architectures varied, with MOSSE and SiamMask achieving an accuracy of 78% and Seq‐NMS 84%. By employing this integrated object detection and tracking pipeline, we demonstrated a noninvasive and reliable approach to studying fish behavior by tracking their movement under field conditions. These cost‐effective technologies provide a means for future studies to scale‐up the analysis of movement across many visual monitoring systems.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7656computer visionconnectivitydeep learningdispersalmachine learningobject tracking
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Lopez‐Marcano
Eric L.Jinks
Christina A. Buelow
Christopher J. Brown
Dadong Wang
Branislav Kusy
Ellen M.Ditria
Rod M. Connolly
spellingShingle Sebastian Lopez‐Marcano
Eric L.Jinks
Christina A. Buelow
Christopher J. Brown
Dadong Wang
Branislav Kusy
Ellen M.Ditria
Rod M. Connolly
Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology
Ecology and Evolution
computer vision
connectivity
deep learning
dispersal
machine learning
object tracking
author_facet Sebastian Lopez‐Marcano
Eric L.Jinks
Christina A. Buelow
Christopher J. Brown
Dadong Wang
Branislav Kusy
Ellen M.Ditria
Rod M. Connolly
author_sort Sebastian Lopez‐Marcano
title Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology
title_short Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology
title_full Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology
title_fullStr Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology
title_full_unstemmed Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology
title_sort automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Animal movement studies are conducted to monitor ecosystem health, understand ecological dynamics, and address management and conservation questions. In marine environments, traditional sampling and monitoring methods to measure animal movement are invasive, labor intensive, costly, and limited in the number of individuals that can be feasibly tracked. Automated detection and tracking of small‐scale movements of many animals through cameras are possible but are largely untested in field conditions, hampering applications to ecological questions. Here, we aimed to test the ability of an automated object detection and object tracking pipeline to track small‐scale movement of many individuals in videos. We applied the pipeline to track fish movement in the field and characterize movement behavior. We automated the detection of a common fisheries species (yellowfin bream, Acanthopagrus australis) along a known movement passageway from underwater videos. We then tracked fish movement with three types of tracking algorithms (MOSSE, Seq‐NMS, and SiamMask) and evaluated their accuracy at characterizing movement. We successfully detected yellowfin bream in a multispecies assemblage (F1 score =91%). At least 120 of the 169 individual bream present in videos were correctly identified and tracked. The accuracies among the three tracking architectures varied, with MOSSE and SiamMask achieving an accuracy of 78% and Seq‐NMS 84%. By employing this integrated object detection and tracking pipeline, we demonstrated a noninvasive and reliable approach to studying fish behavior by tracking their movement under field conditions. These cost‐effective technologies provide a means for future studies to scale‐up the analysis of movement across many visual monitoring systems.
topic computer vision
connectivity
deep learning
dispersal
machine learning
object tracking
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7656
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianlopezmarcano automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology
AT ericljinks automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology
AT christinaabuelow automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology
AT christopherjbrown automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology
AT dadongwang automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology
AT branislavkusy automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology
AT ellenmditria automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology
AT rodmconnolly automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology
_version_ 1721363914829070336