Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology
Abstract Animal movement studies are conducted to monitor ecosystem health, understand ecological dynamics, and address management and conservation questions. In marine environments, traditional sampling and monitoring methods to measure animal movement are invasive, labor intensive, costly, and lim...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7656 |
id |
doaj-51bc38d6d3de463cb162e1d2f55f6940 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-51bc38d6d3de463cb162e1d2f55f69402021-06-22T01:41:53ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582021-06-0111128254826310.1002/ece3.7656Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecologySebastian Lopez‐Marcano0Eric L.Jinks1Christina A. Buelow2Christopher J. Brown3Dadong Wang4Branislav Kusy5Ellen M.Ditria6Rod M. Connolly7Coastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaCoastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaCoastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaCoastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaQuantitative Imaging Research Team CSIRO Marsfield NSW AustraliaData61 CSIRO Pullenvale QLD AustraliaCoastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaCoastal and Marine Research Centre Australian Rivers Institute School of Environment and Science Griffith University Gold Coast QLD AustraliaAbstract Animal movement studies are conducted to monitor ecosystem health, understand ecological dynamics, and address management and conservation questions. In marine environments, traditional sampling and monitoring methods to measure animal movement are invasive, labor intensive, costly, and limited in the number of individuals that can be feasibly tracked. Automated detection and tracking of small‐scale movements of many animals through cameras are possible but are largely untested in field conditions, hampering applications to ecological questions. Here, we aimed to test the ability of an automated object detection and object tracking pipeline to track small‐scale movement of many individuals in videos. We applied the pipeline to track fish movement in the field and characterize movement behavior. We automated the detection of a common fisheries species (yellowfin bream, Acanthopagrus australis) along a known movement passageway from underwater videos. We then tracked fish movement with three types of tracking algorithms (MOSSE, Seq‐NMS, and SiamMask) and evaluated their accuracy at characterizing movement. We successfully detected yellowfin bream in a multispecies assemblage (F1 score =91%). At least 120 of the 169 individual bream present in videos were correctly identified and tracked. The accuracies among the three tracking architectures varied, with MOSSE and SiamMask achieving an accuracy of 78% and Seq‐NMS 84%. By employing this integrated object detection and tracking pipeline, we demonstrated a noninvasive and reliable approach to studying fish behavior by tracking their movement under field conditions. These cost‐effective technologies provide a means for future studies to scale‐up the analysis of movement across many visual monitoring systems.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7656computer visionconnectivitydeep learningdispersalmachine learningobject tracking |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sebastian Lopez‐Marcano Eric L.Jinks Christina A. Buelow Christopher J. Brown Dadong Wang Branislav Kusy Ellen M.Ditria Rod M. Connolly |
spellingShingle |
Sebastian Lopez‐Marcano Eric L.Jinks Christina A. Buelow Christopher J. Brown Dadong Wang Branislav Kusy Ellen M.Ditria Rod M. Connolly Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology Ecology and Evolution computer vision connectivity deep learning dispersal machine learning object tracking |
author_facet |
Sebastian Lopez‐Marcano Eric L.Jinks Christina A. Buelow Christopher J. Brown Dadong Wang Branislav Kusy Ellen M.Ditria Rod M. Connolly |
author_sort |
Sebastian Lopez‐Marcano |
title |
Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology |
title_short |
Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology |
title_full |
Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology |
title_fullStr |
Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology |
title_sort |
automatic detection of fish and tracking of movement for ecology |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Ecology and Evolution |
issn |
2045-7758 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Animal movement studies are conducted to monitor ecosystem health, understand ecological dynamics, and address management and conservation questions. In marine environments, traditional sampling and monitoring methods to measure animal movement are invasive, labor intensive, costly, and limited in the number of individuals that can be feasibly tracked. Automated detection and tracking of small‐scale movements of many animals through cameras are possible but are largely untested in field conditions, hampering applications to ecological questions. Here, we aimed to test the ability of an automated object detection and object tracking pipeline to track small‐scale movement of many individuals in videos. We applied the pipeline to track fish movement in the field and characterize movement behavior. We automated the detection of a common fisheries species (yellowfin bream, Acanthopagrus australis) along a known movement passageway from underwater videos. We then tracked fish movement with three types of tracking algorithms (MOSSE, Seq‐NMS, and SiamMask) and evaluated their accuracy at characterizing movement. We successfully detected yellowfin bream in a multispecies assemblage (F1 score =91%). At least 120 of the 169 individual bream present in videos were correctly identified and tracked. The accuracies among the three tracking architectures varied, with MOSSE and SiamMask achieving an accuracy of 78% and Seq‐NMS 84%. By employing this integrated object detection and tracking pipeline, we demonstrated a noninvasive and reliable approach to studying fish behavior by tracking their movement under field conditions. These cost‐effective technologies provide a means for future studies to scale‐up the analysis of movement across many visual monitoring systems. |
topic |
computer vision connectivity deep learning dispersal machine learning object tracking |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7656 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sebastianlopezmarcano automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology AT ericljinks automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology AT christinaabuelow automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology AT christopherjbrown automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology AT dadongwang automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology AT branislavkusy automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology AT ellenmditria automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology AT rodmconnolly automaticdetectionoffishandtrackingofmovementforecology |
_version_ |
1721363914829070336 |