Trading Tactics: Time to Rethink the Global Trade in Wildlife

The Covid-19 outbreak has brought about fresh and intensified scrutiny of the wildlife trade, which substantively involves commerce in exotic pets. In response, major policy decisions involving trade bans have ensued, with calls for similar such action to be applied across the trade chain. Yet, thes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neil D’Cruze, Jennah Green, Angie Elwin, Jan Schmidt-Burbach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2456
id doaj-51b0110d92094242a3aa40f8466d9578
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51b0110d92094242a3aa40f8466d95782020-12-22T00:05:37ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152020-12-01102456245610.3390/ani10122456Trading Tactics: Time to Rethink the Global Trade in WildlifeNeil D’Cruze0Jennah Green1Angie Elwin2Jan Schmidt-Burbach3World Animal Protection 222 Gray’s Inn Rd., London WC1X 8HB, UKWorld Animal Protection 222 Gray’s Inn Rd., London WC1X 8HB, UKWorld Animal Protection 222 Gray’s Inn Rd., London WC1X 8HB, UKWorld Animal Protection 222 Gray’s Inn Rd., London WC1X 8HB, UKThe Covid-19 outbreak has brought about fresh and intensified scrutiny of the wildlife trade, which substantively involves commerce in exotic pets. In response, major policy decisions involving trade bans have ensued, with calls for similar such action to be applied across the trade chain. Yet, these measures have been criticised, largely based on concerns that they risk exacerbating poverty, undermining human rights, damaging conservation incentives, and otherwise harming sustainable development and conservation efforts. Instead, many critics propose improved regulation of the status quo, with the intention of nurturing a legal, sustainable, safe, humane, and equitable wildlife trade. Herein, we provide a countering view that outlines how the risks presented by the wildlife trade are becoming increasingly recognised as being both manifold and severe; and raise concerns that the goal of a well-regulated wildlife trade is becoming increasingly exposed as a mirage. We conclude that while pursuing the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (with their focus on poverty alleviation, food security, public health, and conservation) is enduringly vital, a flourishing wildlife trade is not. Given that the exploitation of wildlife, including for the pet trade, has been identified as one of the dominant drivers of biodiversity loss, emergence of zoonotic infectious disease, animal suffering, and financial instability, perpetuating the concept of utilising a regulated wildlife trade as the default approach to protect people and planet is in urgent need of re-evaluation.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2456animal welfareconservationCOVID 19pandemicswildlife trade
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neil D’Cruze
Jennah Green
Angie Elwin
Jan Schmidt-Burbach
spellingShingle Neil D’Cruze
Jennah Green
Angie Elwin
Jan Schmidt-Burbach
Trading Tactics: Time to Rethink the Global Trade in Wildlife
Animals
animal welfare
conservation
COVID 19
pandemics
wildlife trade
author_facet Neil D’Cruze
Jennah Green
Angie Elwin
Jan Schmidt-Burbach
author_sort Neil D’Cruze
title Trading Tactics: Time to Rethink the Global Trade in Wildlife
title_short Trading Tactics: Time to Rethink the Global Trade in Wildlife
title_full Trading Tactics: Time to Rethink the Global Trade in Wildlife
title_fullStr Trading Tactics: Time to Rethink the Global Trade in Wildlife
title_full_unstemmed Trading Tactics: Time to Rethink the Global Trade in Wildlife
title_sort trading tactics: time to rethink the global trade in wildlife
publisher MDPI AG
series Animals
issn 2076-2615
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The Covid-19 outbreak has brought about fresh and intensified scrutiny of the wildlife trade, which substantively involves commerce in exotic pets. In response, major policy decisions involving trade bans have ensued, with calls for similar such action to be applied across the trade chain. Yet, these measures have been criticised, largely based on concerns that they risk exacerbating poverty, undermining human rights, damaging conservation incentives, and otherwise harming sustainable development and conservation efforts. Instead, many critics propose improved regulation of the status quo, with the intention of nurturing a legal, sustainable, safe, humane, and equitable wildlife trade. Herein, we provide a countering view that outlines how the risks presented by the wildlife trade are becoming increasingly recognised as being both manifold and severe; and raise concerns that the goal of a well-regulated wildlife trade is becoming increasingly exposed as a mirage. We conclude that while pursuing the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (with their focus on poverty alleviation, food security, public health, and conservation) is enduringly vital, a flourishing wildlife trade is not. Given that the exploitation of wildlife, including for the pet trade, has been identified as one of the dominant drivers of biodiversity loss, emergence of zoonotic infectious disease, animal suffering, and financial instability, perpetuating the concept of utilising a regulated wildlife trade as the default approach to protect people and planet is in urgent need of re-evaluation.
topic animal welfare
conservation
COVID 19
pandemics
wildlife trade
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2456
work_keys_str_mv AT neildcruze tradingtacticstimetorethinktheglobaltradeinwildlife
AT jennahgreen tradingtacticstimetorethinktheglobaltradeinwildlife
AT angieelwin tradingtacticstimetorethinktheglobaltradeinwildlife
AT janschmidtburbach tradingtacticstimetorethinktheglobaltradeinwildlife
_version_ 1724374445655588864