Evolutionary design of optimal surface topographies for biomaterials
Abstract Natural evolution tackles optimization by producing many genetic variants and exposing these variants to selective pressure, resulting in the survival of the fittest. We use high throughput screening of large libraries of materials with differing surface topographies to probe the interactio...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78777-2 |
id |
doaj-5190613c9f6e4de2b27c572e7d398916 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5190613c9f6e4de2b27c572e7d3989162020-12-20T12:34:00ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222020-12-0110111010.1038/s41598-020-78777-2Evolutionary design of optimal surface topographies for biomaterialsAliaksei Vasilevich0Aurélie Carlier1David A. Winkler2Shantanu Singh3Jan de Boer4Institute for Complex Molecular Systems and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of TechnologyMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering, Maastricht UniversityMaterials Science & Engineering, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and HarvardInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of TechnologyAbstract Natural evolution tackles optimization by producing many genetic variants and exposing these variants to selective pressure, resulting in the survival of the fittest. We use high throughput screening of large libraries of materials with differing surface topographies to probe the interactions of implantable device coatings with cells and tissues. However, the vast size of possible parameter design space precludes a brute force approach to screening all topographical possibilities. Here, we took inspiration from Nature to optimize materials surface topographies using evolutionary algorithms. We show that successive cycles of material design, production, fitness assessment, selection, and mutation results in optimization of biomaterials designs. Starting from a small selection of topographically designed surfaces that upregulate expression of an osteogenic marker, we used genetic crossover and random mutagenesis to generate new generations of topographies.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78777-2 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aliaksei Vasilevich Aurélie Carlier David A. Winkler Shantanu Singh Jan de Boer |
spellingShingle |
Aliaksei Vasilevich Aurélie Carlier David A. Winkler Shantanu Singh Jan de Boer Evolutionary design of optimal surface topographies for biomaterials Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Aliaksei Vasilevich Aurélie Carlier David A. Winkler Shantanu Singh Jan de Boer |
author_sort |
Aliaksei Vasilevich |
title |
Evolutionary design of optimal surface topographies for biomaterials |
title_short |
Evolutionary design of optimal surface topographies for biomaterials |
title_full |
Evolutionary design of optimal surface topographies for biomaterials |
title_fullStr |
Evolutionary design of optimal surface topographies for biomaterials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evolutionary design of optimal surface topographies for biomaterials |
title_sort |
evolutionary design of optimal surface topographies for biomaterials |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Natural evolution tackles optimization by producing many genetic variants and exposing these variants to selective pressure, resulting in the survival of the fittest. We use high throughput screening of large libraries of materials with differing surface topographies to probe the interactions of implantable device coatings with cells and tissues. However, the vast size of possible parameter design space precludes a brute force approach to screening all topographical possibilities. Here, we took inspiration from Nature to optimize materials surface topographies using evolutionary algorithms. We show that successive cycles of material design, production, fitness assessment, selection, and mutation results in optimization of biomaterials designs. Starting from a small selection of topographically designed surfaces that upregulate expression of an osteogenic marker, we used genetic crossover and random mutagenesis to generate new generations of topographies. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78777-2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aliakseivasilevich evolutionarydesignofoptimalsurfacetopographiesforbiomaterials AT aureliecarlier evolutionarydesignofoptimalsurfacetopographiesforbiomaterials AT davidawinkler evolutionarydesignofoptimalsurfacetopographiesforbiomaterials AT shantanusingh evolutionarydesignofoptimalsurfacetopographiesforbiomaterials AT jandeboer evolutionarydesignofoptimalsurfacetopographiesforbiomaterials |
_version_ |
1724376366558740480 |