Clitic or Agreement Restriction in Santali: A Typological Analysis

This paper investigates the syntactic configuration of pronominal number marking in Santali. Syntactic, morphological and prosodic restrictions show that pronominal number markers have properties of an affix as well as a clitic. A marker is an affix due to the fact that it cannot participate in a b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mayuri J. DILIP, Rajesh KUMAR
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts) 2020-01-01
Series:Acta Linguistica Asiatica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/ala/article/view/8377
id doaj-51754c59121c44b1b54f21986cf7e51e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51754c59121c44b1b54f21986cf7e51e2020-11-24T21:43:51ZengZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)Acta Linguistica Asiatica2232-33172020-01-0110110.4312/ala.10.1.9-33Clitic or Agreement Restriction in Santali: A Typological AnalysisMayuri J. DILIP0Rajesh KUMAR1Indian Institute of Technology MadrasIndian Institute of Technology Madras This paper investigates the syntactic configuration of pronominal number marking in Santali. Syntactic, morphological and prosodic restrictions show that pronominal number markers have properties of an affix as well as a clitic. A marker is an affix due to the fact that it cannot participate in a binding relation with other arguments. A pronominal number marker also functions as a clitic since it is attached to prosodically the most prominent constituent. The arguments that trigger object agreement do not manifest one particular case, but instead indicate a dissociation between a case and object agreement. On the other hand, the argument with subject agreement manifests nominative case only, indicating an association between nominative case and subject agreement. Both subject and object agreement are sensitive to case that indicates a property of an affix. Keeping in view the distribution of the pronominal number markers, we analyze feature checking of the two parameters, namely agreement and case in Santali. https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/ala/article/view/8377cliticaffixagreementprosodySantali
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mayuri J. DILIP
Rajesh KUMAR
spellingShingle Mayuri J. DILIP
Rajesh KUMAR
Clitic or Agreement Restriction in Santali: A Typological Analysis
Acta Linguistica Asiatica
clitic
affix
agreement
prosody
Santali
author_facet Mayuri J. DILIP
Rajesh KUMAR
author_sort Mayuri J. DILIP
title Clitic or Agreement Restriction in Santali: A Typological Analysis
title_short Clitic or Agreement Restriction in Santali: A Typological Analysis
title_full Clitic or Agreement Restriction in Santali: A Typological Analysis
title_fullStr Clitic or Agreement Restriction in Santali: A Typological Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clitic or Agreement Restriction in Santali: A Typological Analysis
title_sort clitic or agreement restriction in santali: a typological analysis
publisher Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)
series Acta Linguistica Asiatica
issn 2232-3317
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This paper investigates the syntactic configuration of pronominal number marking in Santali. Syntactic, morphological and prosodic restrictions show that pronominal number markers have properties of an affix as well as a clitic. A marker is an affix due to the fact that it cannot participate in a binding relation with other arguments. A pronominal number marker also functions as a clitic since it is attached to prosodically the most prominent constituent. The arguments that trigger object agreement do not manifest one particular case, but instead indicate a dissociation between a case and object agreement. On the other hand, the argument with subject agreement manifests nominative case only, indicating an association between nominative case and subject agreement. Both subject and object agreement are sensitive to case that indicates a property of an affix. Keeping in view the distribution of the pronominal number markers, we analyze feature checking of the two parameters, namely agreement and case in Santali.
topic clitic
affix
agreement
prosody
Santali
url https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/ala/article/view/8377
work_keys_str_mv AT mayurijdilip cliticoragreementrestrictioninsantaliatypologicalanalysis
AT rajeshkumar cliticoragreementrestrictioninsantaliatypologicalanalysis
_version_ 1725911649280327680