Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics
One of the most important questions on Kant’s philosophy is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics. This article tries to answer two questions on Kant’s philosophy: 1- Is the metaphysics, in the philosophy of Kant, meaningful or meaningless? 2- Is the meaningfulness or meaningless...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Tabriz
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Philosophical Investigations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_5753.html |
id |
doaj-516d81797f814d71a55f127966e5ae29 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-516d81797f814d71a55f127966e5ae292020-11-25T02:23:48ZengUniversity of TabrizPhilosophical Investigations2251-79602423-44192016-12-01101993113 Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of MetaphysicsMasoud Omid0Associate Professor of Philosophy, Tabriz UniversityOne of the most important questions on Kant’s philosophy is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics. This article tries to answer two questions on Kant’s philosophy: 1- Is the metaphysics, in the philosophy of Kant, meaningful or meaningless? 2- Is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics, for Kant, so important for contemporary philosophy? In this paper, firstly, I argue that we can call Kant’s approach to Metaphysics not as a linguistic one (including; language metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of ordinary language or linguistics) but it is a transcendental epistemology. Secondly, in terms of problem-based, the meaningfulness or meaninglessness of metaphysics not only is not the basic problem of Kant, but his philosophy in a clear, distinct and independent manner, involves not such an issue. Thirdly, on the problem of the meaningfulness and meaninglessness of metaphysics, it could be accepted that Kant's philosophy seems to have the backgrounds, indications, and implications For the second question, it could be distinguished two levels of meaningfulness or meaningless in Kant's philosophy: linguistic and nonlinguistic levels. The linguistic level are considered from two directions, i.e., the parts or components (words and metaphysical propositions) and the whole (as the science of metaphysics). In the linguistic level, in one hand, I argue that the metaphysical words or propositions are not meaningless, but on the other hand, the proposition that “Metaphysics is a science” is a meaningless proposition. In the nonlinguistic level, metaphysics due to not reaching to the ends and goals seems meaninglessness as well.http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_5753.htmlKantcritical view; metaphysicslinguistic meaningfulnessnonlinguistic meaninglessness |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Masoud Omid |
spellingShingle |
Masoud Omid Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics Philosophical Investigations Kant critical view; metaphysics linguistic meaningfulness nonlinguistic meaninglessness |
author_facet |
Masoud Omid |
author_sort |
Masoud Omid |
title |
Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics |
title_short |
Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics |
title_full |
Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics |
title_fullStr |
Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics |
title_sort |
kant and the problem of meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics |
publisher |
University of Tabriz |
series |
Philosophical Investigations |
issn |
2251-7960 2423-4419 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
One of the most important questions on Kant’s philosophy is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics. This article tries to answer two questions on Kant’s philosophy:
1- Is the metaphysics, in the philosophy of Kant, meaningful or meaningless?
2- Is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics, for Kant, so important for contemporary philosophy?
In this paper, firstly, I argue that we can call Kant’s approach to Metaphysics not as a linguistic one (including; language metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of ordinary language or linguistics) but it is a transcendental epistemology. Secondly, in terms of problem-based, the meaningfulness or meaninglessness of metaphysics not only is not the basic problem of Kant, but his philosophy in a clear, distinct and independent manner, involves not such an issue. Thirdly, on the problem of the meaningfulness and meaninglessness of metaphysics, it could be accepted that Kant's philosophy seems to have the backgrounds, indications, and implications
For the second question, it could be distinguished two levels of meaningfulness or meaningless in Kant's philosophy: linguistic and nonlinguistic levels. The linguistic level are considered from two directions, i.e., the parts or components (words and metaphysical propositions) and the whole (as the science of metaphysics).
In the linguistic level, in one hand, I argue that the metaphysical words or propositions are not meaningless, but on the other hand, the proposition that “Metaphysics is a science” is a meaningless proposition. In the nonlinguistic level, metaphysics due to not reaching to the ends and goals seems meaninglessness as well. |
topic |
Kant critical view; metaphysics linguistic meaningfulness nonlinguistic meaninglessness |
url |
http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_5753.html |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT masoudomid kantandtheproblemofmeaningfulnessormeaninglessofmetaphysics |
_version_ |
1724857133643595776 |