Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics

One of the most important questions on Kant’s philosophy is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics. This article tries to answer two questions on Kant’s philosophy: 1- Is the metaphysics, in the philosophy of Kant, meaningful or meaningless? 2- Is the meaningfulness or meaningless...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Masoud Omid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tabriz 2016-12-01
Series:Philosophical Investigations
Subjects:
Online Access:http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_5753.html
id doaj-516d81797f814d71a55f127966e5ae29
record_format Article
spelling doaj-516d81797f814d71a55f127966e5ae292020-11-25T02:23:48ZengUniversity of TabrizPhilosophical Investigations2251-79602423-44192016-12-01101993113 Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of MetaphysicsMasoud Omid0Associate Professor of Philosophy, Tabriz UniversityOne of the most important questions on Kant’s philosophy is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics. This article tries to answer two questions on Kant’s philosophy: 1- Is the metaphysics, in the philosophy of Kant, meaningful or meaningless? 2- Is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics, for Kant, so important for contemporary philosophy? In this paper, firstly, I argue that we can call Kant’s approach to Metaphysics not as a linguistic one (including; language metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of ordinary language or linguistics) but it is a transcendental epistemology. Secondly, in terms of problem-based, the meaningfulness or meaninglessness of metaphysics not only is not the basic problem of Kant, but his philosophy in a clear, distinct and independent manner, involves not such an issue. Thirdly, on the problem of the meaningfulness and meaninglessness of metaphysics, it could be accepted that Kant's philosophy seems to have the backgrounds, indications, and implications For the second question, it could be distinguished two levels of meaningfulness or meaningless in Kant's philosophy: linguistic and nonlinguistic levels. The linguistic level are considered from two directions, i.e., the parts or components (words and metaphysical propositions) and the whole (as the science of metaphysics). In the linguistic level, in one hand, I argue that the metaphysical words or propositions are not meaningless, but on the other hand, the proposition that “Metaphysics is a science” is a meaningless proposition. In the nonlinguistic level, metaphysics due to not reaching to the ends and goals seems meaninglessness as well.http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_5753.htmlKantcritical view; metaphysicslinguistic meaningfulnessnonlinguistic meaninglessness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Masoud Omid
spellingShingle Masoud Omid
Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics
Philosophical Investigations
Kant
critical view; metaphysics
linguistic meaningfulness
nonlinguistic meaninglessness
author_facet Masoud Omid
author_sort Masoud Omid
title Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics
title_short Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics
title_full Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics
title_fullStr Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics
title_full_unstemmed Kant and the problem of Meaningfulness or Meaningless of Metaphysics
title_sort kant and the problem of meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics
publisher University of Tabriz
series Philosophical Investigations
issn 2251-7960
2423-4419
publishDate 2016-12-01
description One of the most important questions on Kant’s philosophy is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics. This article tries to answer two questions on Kant’s philosophy: 1- Is the metaphysics, in the philosophy of Kant, meaningful or meaningless? 2- Is the meaningfulness or meaningless of metaphysics, for Kant, so important for contemporary philosophy? In this paper, firstly, I argue that we can call Kant’s approach to Metaphysics not as a linguistic one (including; language metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of ordinary language or linguistics) but it is a transcendental epistemology. Secondly, in terms of problem-based, the meaningfulness or meaninglessness of metaphysics not only is not the basic problem of Kant, but his philosophy in a clear, distinct and independent manner, involves not such an issue. Thirdly, on the problem of the meaningfulness and meaninglessness of metaphysics, it could be accepted that Kant's philosophy seems to have the backgrounds, indications, and implications For the second question, it could be distinguished two levels of meaningfulness or meaningless in Kant's philosophy: linguistic and nonlinguistic levels. The linguistic level are considered from two directions, i.e., the parts or components (words and metaphysical propositions) and the whole (as the science of metaphysics). In the linguistic level, in one hand, I argue that the metaphysical words or propositions are not meaningless, but on the other hand, the proposition that “Metaphysics is a science” is a meaningless proposition. In the nonlinguistic level, metaphysics due to not reaching to the ends and goals seems meaninglessness as well.
topic Kant
critical view; metaphysics
linguistic meaningfulness
nonlinguistic meaninglessness
url http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_5753.html
work_keys_str_mv AT masoudomid kantandtheproblemofmeaningfulnessormeaninglessofmetaphysics
_version_ 1724857133643595776