The Nature of the Nuisance—Damage or Threat—Determines How Perceived Monetary Costs and Cultural Benefits Influence Farmer Tolerance of Wildlife
Biodiversity-friendly farming is a growing area of discussion among farmers, as well as in government departments and non-government organizations interested in conservation on private land. Those seeking to encourage biodiversity on farms must understand the production challenges presented by wildl...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-08-01
|
| Series: | Diversity |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/7/3/318 |
| id |
doaj-516c1055a70945f39e1b109e010b0cf5 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-516c1055a70945f39e1b109e010b0cf52020-11-24T20:42:22ZengMDPI AGDiversity1424-28182015-08-017331834110.3390/d7030318d7030318The Nature of the Nuisance—Damage or Threat—Determines How Perceived Monetary Costs and Cultural Benefits Influence Farmer Tolerance of WildlifeKate Goodale0Glen J. Parsons1Kate Sherren2School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, CanadaNova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Division, Kentville, NS B4N 4E5, CanadaSchool for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, CanadaBiodiversity-friendly farming is a growing area of discussion among farmers, as well as in government departments and non-government organizations interested in conservation on private land. Those seeking to encourage biodiversity on farms must understand the production challenges presented by wildlife. Such species destroy agricultural commodities or present threats to family, pets, or infrastructure. A survey of farmers in the Canadian Maritime provinces sought to understand the drivers of tolerance. Our results demonstrated that estimated monetary losses from a species were largely unrelated to the perceived acceptability of those losses. Rather, the type of nuisance—damage to crops/property or threat to the safety of people, pets, or livestock—determined whether a loss would be perceived as acceptable and if that acceptability would influence tolerance. For damaging species, the perception of cultural benefits seemed able to convert high estimated economic losses to acceptable ones, for overall tolerance. For threatening species, however, minor perceived financial losses seemed augmented by low perceived benefits and made unacceptable, leading to intolerance. Female, older, and part-time farmers were most likely to identify threatening species as a nuisance. The use of an elicitation-based survey design provided novel insight as a result of the lack of prompts, but also presented analytical challenges that weakened predictive power. Recommendations are given for further research and management.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/7/3/318wildlife acceptance capacitycultural carrying capacityfarm biodiversityagroecosystemcultural ecosystem serviceshuman dimensionshuman-wildlife interaction |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Kate Goodale Glen J. Parsons Kate Sherren |
| spellingShingle |
Kate Goodale Glen J. Parsons Kate Sherren The Nature of the Nuisance—Damage or Threat—Determines How Perceived Monetary Costs and Cultural Benefits Influence Farmer Tolerance of Wildlife Diversity wildlife acceptance capacity cultural carrying capacity farm biodiversity agroecosystem cultural ecosystem services human dimensions human-wildlife interaction |
| author_facet |
Kate Goodale Glen J. Parsons Kate Sherren |
| author_sort |
Kate Goodale |
| title |
The Nature of the Nuisance—Damage or Threat—Determines How Perceived Monetary Costs and Cultural Benefits Influence Farmer Tolerance of Wildlife |
| title_short |
The Nature of the Nuisance—Damage or Threat—Determines How Perceived Monetary Costs and Cultural Benefits Influence Farmer Tolerance of Wildlife |
| title_full |
The Nature of the Nuisance—Damage or Threat—Determines How Perceived Monetary Costs and Cultural Benefits Influence Farmer Tolerance of Wildlife |
| title_fullStr |
The Nature of the Nuisance—Damage or Threat—Determines How Perceived Monetary Costs and Cultural Benefits Influence Farmer Tolerance of Wildlife |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Nature of the Nuisance—Damage or Threat—Determines How Perceived Monetary Costs and Cultural Benefits Influence Farmer Tolerance of Wildlife |
| title_sort |
nature of the nuisance—damage or threat—determines how perceived monetary costs and cultural benefits influence farmer tolerance of wildlife |
| publisher |
MDPI AG |
| series |
Diversity |
| issn |
1424-2818 |
| publishDate |
2015-08-01 |
| description |
Biodiversity-friendly farming is a growing area of discussion among farmers, as well as in government departments and non-government organizations interested in conservation on private land. Those seeking to encourage biodiversity on farms must understand the production challenges presented by wildlife. Such species destroy agricultural commodities or present threats to family, pets, or infrastructure. A survey of farmers in the Canadian Maritime provinces sought to understand the drivers of tolerance. Our results demonstrated that estimated monetary losses from a species were largely unrelated to the perceived acceptability of those losses. Rather, the type of nuisance—damage to crops/property or threat to the safety of people, pets, or livestock—determined whether a loss would be perceived as acceptable and if that acceptability would influence tolerance. For damaging species, the perception of cultural benefits seemed able to convert high estimated economic losses to acceptable ones, for overall tolerance. For threatening species, however, minor perceived financial losses seemed augmented by low perceived benefits and made unacceptable, leading to intolerance. Female, older, and part-time farmers were most likely to identify threatening species as a nuisance. The use of an elicitation-based survey design provided novel insight as a result of the lack of prompts, but also presented analytical challenges that weakened predictive power. Recommendations are given for further research and management. |
| topic |
wildlife acceptance capacity cultural carrying capacity farm biodiversity agroecosystem cultural ecosystem services human dimensions human-wildlife interaction |
| url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/7/3/318 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT kategoodale thenatureofthenuisancedamageorthreatdetermineshowperceivedmonetarycostsandculturalbenefitsinfluencefarmertoleranceofwildlife AT glenjparsons thenatureofthenuisancedamageorthreatdetermineshowperceivedmonetarycostsandculturalbenefitsinfluencefarmertoleranceofwildlife AT katesherren thenatureofthenuisancedamageorthreatdetermineshowperceivedmonetarycostsandculturalbenefitsinfluencefarmertoleranceofwildlife AT kategoodale natureofthenuisancedamageorthreatdetermineshowperceivedmonetarycostsandculturalbenefitsinfluencefarmertoleranceofwildlife AT glenjparsons natureofthenuisancedamageorthreatdetermineshowperceivedmonetarycostsandculturalbenefitsinfluencefarmertoleranceofwildlife AT katesherren natureofthenuisancedamageorthreatdetermineshowperceivedmonetarycostsandculturalbenefitsinfluencefarmertoleranceofwildlife |
| _version_ |
1716822347625791488 |