Anterior fusion technique for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of patients with different number of levels fused.

OBJECTIVE: The anterior approach for multilevel CSM has been developed and obtained favorable outcomes. However, the operation difficulty, invasiveness and operative risks increase when multi-level involved. This study was to assess surgical parameters, complications, clinical and radiological outco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shunzhi Yu, Fengning Li, Ning Yan, Chaoqun Yuan, Shisheng He, Tiesheng Hou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3949986?pdf=render
id doaj-5144c2963319494c8c5101ddc6286e46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5144c2963319494c8c5101ddc6286e462020-11-25T01:56:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0193e9132910.1371/journal.pone.0091329Anterior fusion technique for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of patients with different number of levels fused.Shunzhi YuFengning LiNing YanChaoqun YuanShisheng HeTiesheng HouOBJECTIVE: The anterior approach for multilevel CSM has been developed and obtained favorable outcomes. However, the operation difficulty, invasiveness and operative risks increase when multi-level involved. This study was to assess surgical parameters, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of 2-, 3- and 4-level CSM. METHODS: A total of 248 patients with 2-, 3- or 4-level CSM who underwent anterior decompression and fusion procedures between October 2005 and June 2011 were divided into three groups, the 2-level group (106 patients), the 3-level group (98 patients) and the 4-level group (44 patients). The clinical and Radiographic outcomes including Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Odom's Scale, hospital stay, blood loss, operation time, fusion rate, cervical lordosis, cervical range of motion (ROM), and complications were compared. RESULTS: At a minimum of 2-year follow-up, no statistical differences in JOA score, NDI score, Odom's Scale, hospital stay, fusion rate and cervical lordosis were found among the 3 groups. However, the mean postoperative NDI score of the 4-level group was significantly higher than that in the other two groups (P<0.05), and in terms of postoperative total ROM, the 3-level group was superior to the 4-level group and inferior to 2-level group (P<0.05). The decrease rate of ROM in the 3-level group was significantly higher than that in the 2-level group, and lower than that in the 4-level group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As the number of involved levels increased, surgical results become worse in terms of operative time, blood loss, NDI score, cervical ROM and complication rates postoperatively. An appropriate surgical procedure for multilevel CSM should be chosen according to comprehensive clinical evaluation before operation, thus reducing fusion and decompression levels if possible.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3949986?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shunzhi Yu
Fengning Li
Ning Yan
Chaoqun Yuan
Shisheng He
Tiesheng Hou
spellingShingle Shunzhi Yu
Fengning Li
Ning Yan
Chaoqun Yuan
Shisheng He
Tiesheng Hou
Anterior fusion technique for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of patients with different number of levels fused.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Shunzhi Yu
Fengning Li
Ning Yan
Chaoqun Yuan
Shisheng He
Tiesheng Hou
author_sort Shunzhi Yu
title Anterior fusion technique for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of patients with different number of levels fused.
title_short Anterior fusion technique for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of patients with different number of levels fused.
title_full Anterior fusion technique for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of patients with different number of levels fused.
title_fullStr Anterior fusion technique for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of patients with different number of levels fused.
title_full_unstemmed Anterior fusion technique for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of patients with different number of levels fused.
title_sort anterior fusion technique for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of patients with different number of levels fused.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description OBJECTIVE: The anterior approach for multilevel CSM has been developed and obtained favorable outcomes. However, the operation difficulty, invasiveness and operative risks increase when multi-level involved. This study was to assess surgical parameters, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of 2-, 3- and 4-level CSM. METHODS: A total of 248 patients with 2-, 3- or 4-level CSM who underwent anterior decompression and fusion procedures between October 2005 and June 2011 were divided into three groups, the 2-level group (106 patients), the 3-level group (98 patients) and the 4-level group (44 patients). The clinical and Radiographic outcomes including Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Odom's Scale, hospital stay, blood loss, operation time, fusion rate, cervical lordosis, cervical range of motion (ROM), and complications were compared. RESULTS: At a minimum of 2-year follow-up, no statistical differences in JOA score, NDI score, Odom's Scale, hospital stay, fusion rate and cervical lordosis were found among the 3 groups. However, the mean postoperative NDI score of the 4-level group was significantly higher than that in the other two groups (P<0.05), and in terms of postoperative total ROM, the 3-level group was superior to the 4-level group and inferior to 2-level group (P<0.05). The decrease rate of ROM in the 3-level group was significantly higher than that in the 2-level group, and lower than that in the 4-level group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As the number of involved levels increased, surgical results become worse in terms of operative time, blood loss, NDI score, cervical ROM and complication rates postoperatively. An appropriate surgical procedure for multilevel CSM should be chosen according to comprehensive clinical evaluation before operation, thus reducing fusion and decompression levels if possible.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3949986?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT shunzhiyu anteriorfusiontechniqueformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectiveanalysisofsurgicaloutcomeofpatientswithdifferentnumberoflevelsfused
AT fengningli anteriorfusiontechniqueformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectiveanalysisofsurgicaloutcomeofpatientswithdifferentnumberoflevelsfused
AT ningyan anteriorfusiontechniqueformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectiveanalysisofsurgicaloutcomeofpatientswithdifferentnumberoflevelsfused
AT chaoqunyuan anteriorfusiontechniqueformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectiveanalysisofsurgicaloutcomeofpatientswithdifferentnumberoflevelsfused
AT shishenghe anteriorfusiontechniqueformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectiveanalysisofsurgicaloutcomeofpatientswithdifferentnumberoflevelsfused
AT tieshenghou anteriorfusiontechniqueformultilevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaretrospectiveanalysisofsurgicaloutcomeofpatientswithdifferentnumberoflevelsfused
_version_ 1724982063586607104