Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis

This study is aimed to compare outcomes of penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty to inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra as a singlecentre experience. Data regarding vaginoplasty performed between May 2003 and January 2014 were reviewed. Subjects were divided into two groups accord...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giorgio Gentile, Ardigò Martino, Daniela Nadalin, Martina Masetti, Brigida Lilia Marta, Franco Palmisano, Alessandro Franceschelli, Patrizia Stella, Anna Paola Sanfelici, Eugenio Brunocilla, Fulvio Colombo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2020-10-01
Series:Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/aiua/article/view/8937
id doaj-5142f0e151614cb8b63a43d81432df63
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5142f0e151614cb8b63a43d81432df632020-11-25T02:12:57ZengPAGEPress PublicationsArchivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia1124-35622282-41972020-10-0192310.4081/aiua.2020.3.186Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysisGiorgio Gentile0Ardigò Martino1Daniela Nadalin2Martina Masetti3Brigida Lilia Marta4Franco Palmisano5Alessandro Franceschelli6Patrizia Stella7Anna Paola Sanfelici8Eugenio Brunocilla9Fulvio Colombo10Andrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, BolognaInstitute for Integrated Health, Federal University of Mato Grosso Do Sul, Campo Grande MSHealth Centre Gender Dysphoria at Movement for Transsexual Identity – Agreement with Local Health care Unit, City of BolognaDepartment of Urology, University of BolognaDepartment of Anthropology, Medical Anthropology Research Center, Rovira I Virgili University, TarragonaAndrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, BolognaAndrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, BolognaHealth Centre Gender Dysphoria at Movement for Transsexual Identity – Agreement with Local Health care Unit, City of BolognaHealth Centre Gender Dysphoria at Movement for Transsexual Identity – Agreement with Local Health care Unit, City of BolognaDepartment of Urology, University of BolognaAndrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna This study is aimed to compare outcomes of penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty to inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra as a singlecentre experience. Data regarding vaginoplasty performed between May 2003 and January 2014 were reviewed. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique performed: perineal- scrotal flap vaginoplasty (Group A), and inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra vaginoplasty (Group B). All patients underwent to psychological analysis before surgery. Functional follow-up was based on a modified validated Female Sexual Function Index. Overall, 67 patients with a mean (SD) age of 34 (±9.38) years underwent to surgery. 41 patients were included into the Group A and 26 into the Group B. Mean operative time among Groups A and B was 316 (±101.65) and 594 (±89.06) minutes, respectively (p<0.0001). Longer postoperative hospitalization was shown in Group B (14 days ± 4,51) than in Group A (10 days ± 2,49); (p<0.0001). Group B patients showed a higher anemization rate requiring blood transfusion (p=0.00014) as well as compressive neuropathy (p=0.038). In addition to this, necrosis of the skin flap was reported in 8 patients of Group B (p<0.0001). Comprehensive functional follow-up data was included; spontaneous vaginal lubrication was not reported in 82.4% of Group A vs 12.5% cases of Group B (p=0.0085). When compared to penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty, inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra technique shows an increased risk of complications with comparable satisfaction rates whereas a higher spontaneous vaginal lubrication is reported. Sexological support is of utmost importance in this setting. https://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/aiua/article/view/8937Transgender; Penile inversion; Vaginoplasty; Techniques; Outcomes, Sexologist
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giorgio Gentile
Ardigò Martino
Daniela Nadalin
Martina Masetti
Brigida Lilia Marta
Franco Palmisano
Alessandro Franceschelli
Patrizia Stella
Anna Paola Sanfelici
Eugenio Brunocilla
Fulvio Colombo
spellingShingle Giorgio Gentile
Ardigò Martino
Daniela Nadalin
Martina Masetti
Brigida Lilia Marta
Franco Palmisano
Alessandro Franceschelli
Patrizia Stella
Anna Paola Sanfelici
Eugenio Brunocilla
Fulvio Colombo
Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia
Transgender; Penile inversion; Vaginoplasty; Techniques; Outcomes, Sexologist
author_facet Giorgio Gentile
Ardigò Martino
Daniela Nadalin
Martina Masetti
Brigida Lilia Marta
Franco Palmisano
Alessandro Franceschelli
Patrizia Stella
Anna Paola Sanfelici
Eugenio Brunocilla
Fulvio Colombo
author_sort Giorgio Gentile
title Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis
title_short Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis
title_full Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis
title_fullStr Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis
title_full_unstemmed Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis
title_sort penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: a multidisciplinary single-centre analysis
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia
issn 1124-3562
2282-4197
publishDate 2020-10-01
description This study is aimed to compare outcomes of penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty to inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra as a singlecentre experience. Data regarding vaginoplasty performed between May 2003 and January 2014 were reviewed. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique performed: perineal- scrotal flap vaginoplasty (Group A), and inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra vaginoplasty (Group B). All patients underwent to psychological analysis before surgery. Functional follow-up was based on a modified validated Female Sexual Function Index. Overall, 67 patients with a mean (SD) age of 34 (±9.38) years underwent to surgery. 41 patients were included into the Group A and 26 into the Group B. Mean operative time among Groups A and B was 316 (±101.65) and 594 (±89.06) minutes, respectively (p<0.0001). Longer postoperative hospitalization was shown in Group B (14 days ± 4,51) than in Group A (10 days ± 2,49); (p<0.0001). Group B patients showed a higher anemization rate requiring blood transfusion (p=0.00014) as well as compressive neuropathy (p=0.038). In addition to this, necrosis of the skin flap was reported in 8 patients of Group B (p<0.0001). Comprehensive functional follow-up data was included; spontaneous vaginal lubrication was not reported in 82.4% of Group A vs 12.5% cases of Group B (p=0.0085). When compared to penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty, inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra technique shows an increased risk of complications with comparable satisfaction rates whereas a higher spontaneous vaginal lubrication is reported. Sexological support is of utmost importance in this setting.
topic Transgender; Penile inversion; Vaginoplasty; Techniques; Outcomes, Sexologist
url https://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/aiua/article/view/8937
work_keys_str_mv AT giorgiogentile penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
AT ardigomartino penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
AT danielanadalin penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
AT martinamasetti penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
AT brigidaliliamarta penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
AT francopalmisano penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
AT alessandrofranceschelli penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
AT patriziastella penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
AT annapaolasanfelici penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
AT eugeniobrunocilla penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
AT fulviocolombo penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis
_version_ 1724907239417839616