Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis
This study is aimed to compare outcomes of penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty to inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra as a singlecentre experience. Data regarding vaginoplasty performed between May 2003 and January 2014 were reviewed. Subjects were divided into two groups accord...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PAGEPress Publications
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/aiua/article/view/8937 |
id |
doaj-5142f0e151614cb8b63a43d81432df63 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5142f0e151614cb8b63a43d81432df632020-11-25T02:12:57ZengPAGEPress PublicationsArchivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia1124-35622282-41972020-10-0192310.4081/aiua.2020.3.186Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysisGiorgio Gentile0Ardigò Martino1Daniela Nadalin2Martina Masetti3Brigida Lilia Marta4Franco Palmisano5Alessandro Franceschelli6Patrizia Stella7Anna Paola Sanfelici8Eugenio Brunocilla9Fulvio Colombo10Andrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, BolognaInstitute for Integrated Health, Federal University of Mato Grosso Do Sul, Campo Grande MSHealth Centre Gender Dysphoria at Movement for Transsexual Identity – Agreement with Local Health care Unit, City of BolognaDepartment of Urology, University of BolognaDepartment of Anthropology, Medical Anthropology Research Center, Rovira I Virgili University, TarragonaAndrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, BolognaAndrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, BolognaHealth Centre Gender Dysphoria at Movement for Transsexual Identity – Agreement with Local Health care Unit, City of BolognaHealth Centre Gender Dysphoria at Movement for Transsexual Identity – Agreement with Local Health care Unit, City of BolognaDepartment of Urology, University of BolognaAndrology Unit, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna This study is aimed to compare outcomes of penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty to inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra as a singlecentre experience. Data regarding vaginoplasty performed between May 2003 and January 2014 were reviewed. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique performed: perineal- scrotal flap vaginoplasty (Group A), and inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra vaginoplasty (Group B). All patients underwent to psychological analysis before surgery. Functional follow-up was based on a modified validated Female Sexual Function Index. Overall, 67 patients with a mean (SD) age of 34 (±9.38) years underwent to surgery. 41 patients were included into the Group A and 26 into the Group B. Mean operative time among Groups A and B was 316 (±101.65) and 594 (±89.06) minutes, respectively (p<0.0001). Longer postoperative hospitalization was shown in Group B (14 days ± 4,51) than in Group A (10 days ± 2,49); (p<0.0001). Group B patients showed a higher anemization rate requiring blood transfusion (p=0.00014) as well as compressive neuropathy (p=0.038). In addition to this, necrosis of the skin flap was reported in 8 patients of Group B (p<0.0001). Comprehensive functional follow-up data was included; spontaneous vaginal lubrication was not reported in 82.4% of Group A vs 12.5% cases of Group B (p=0.0085). When compared to penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty, inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra technique shows an increased risk of complications with comparable satisfaction rates whereas a higher spontaneous vaginal lubrication is reported. Sexological support is of utmost importance in this setting. https://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/aiua/article/view/8937Transgender; Penile inversion; Vaginoplasty; Techniques; Outcomes, Sexologist |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Giorgio Gentile Ardigò Martino Daniela Nadalin Martina Masetti Brigida Lilia Marta Franco Palmisano Alessandro Franceschelli Patrizia Stella Anna Paola Sanfelici Eugenio Brunocilla Fulvio Colombo |
spellingShingle |
Giorgio Gentile Ardigò Martino Daniela Nadalin Martina Masetti Brigida Lilia Marta Franco Palmisano Alessandro Franceschelli Patrizia Stella Anna Paola Sanfelici Eugenio Brunocilla Fulvio Colombo Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia Transgender; Penile inversion; Vaginoplasty; Techniques; Outcomes, Sexologist |
author_facet |
Giorgio Gentile Ardigò Martino Daniela Nadalin Martina Masetti Brigida Lilia Marta Franco Palmisano Alessandro Franceschelli Patrizia Stella Anna Paola Sanfelici Eugenio Brunocilla Fulvio Colombo |
author_sort |
Giorgio Gentile |
title |
Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis |
title_short |
Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis |
title_full |
Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis |
title_fullStr |
Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: A multidisciplinary single-centre analysis |
title_sort |
penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty versus inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra: a multidisciplinary single-centre analysis |
publisher |
PAGEPress Publications |
series |
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia |
issn |
1124-3562 2282-4197 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
This study is aimed to compare outcomes of penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty to inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra as a singlecentre experience. Data regarding vaginoplasty performed between May 2003 and January 2014 were reviewed. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique performed: perineal- scrotal flap vaginoplasty (Group A), and inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra vaginoplasty (Group B). All patients underwent to psychological analysis before surgery. Functional follow-up was based on a modified validated Female Sexual Function Index. Overall, 67 patients with a mean (SD) age of 34 (±9.38) years underwent to surgery. 41 patients were included into the Group A and 26 into the Group B. Mean operative time among Groups A and B was 316 (±101.65) and 594 (±89.06) minutes, respectively (p<0.0001). Longer postoperative hospitalization was shown in Group B (14 days ± 4,51) than in Group A (10 days ± 2,49); (p<0.0001). Group B patients showed a higher anemization rate requiring blood transfusion (p=0.00014) as well as compressive neuropathy (p=0.038). In addition to this, necrosis of the skin flap was reported in 8 patients of Group B (p<0.0001). Comprehensive functional follow-up data was included; spontaneous vaginal lubrication was not reported in 82.4% of Group A vs 12.5% cases of Group B (p=0.0085). When compared to penile-scrotal flap vaginoplasty, inverted penile skin flap expanded with spatulated urethra technique shows an increased risk of complications with comparable satisfaction rates whereas a higher spontaneous vaginal lubrication is reported. Sexological support is of utmost importance in this setting.
|
topic |
Transgender; Penile inversion; Vaginoplasty; Techniques; Outcomes, Sexologist |
url |
https://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/aiua/article/view/8937 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giorgiogentile penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis AT ardigomartino penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis AT danielanadalin penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis AT martinamasetti penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis AT brigidaliliamarta penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis AT francopalmisano penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis AT alessandrofranceschelli penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis AT patriziastella penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis AT annapaolasanfelici penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis AT eugeniobrunocilla penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis AT fulviocolombo penilescrotalflapvaginoplastyversusinvertedpenileskinflapexpandedwithspatulatedurethraamultidisciplinarysinglecentreanalysis |
_version_ |
1724907239417839616 |