Dynamic Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Nasal Airflow Resistance during Nasal Allergen Provocation Test

Allergic rhinitis is a major chronic respiratory disease and an immunoneuronal disorder. We aimed at providing further knowledge on the function of the neural system in nasal allergic reaction. Here, a method to assess simultaneously the nasal airflow resistance and the underlying function of autono...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiina M. Seppänen, Olli-Pekka Alho, Tapio Seppänen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1245418
id doaj-5130e3ad6b4c49d98afdeaebb9de4870
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5130e3ad6b4c49d98afdeaebb9de48702020-11-25T00:35:59ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Healthcare Engineering2040-22952040-23092016-01-01201610.1155/2016/12454181245418Dynamic Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Nasal Airflow Resistance during Nasal Allergen Provocation TestTiina M. Seppänen0Olli-Pekka Alho1Tapio Seppänen2Center for Machine Vision and Signal Analysis, University of Oulu, Oulu, FinlandMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, FinlandCenter for Machine Vision and Signal Analysis, University of Oulu, Oulu, FinlandAllergic rhinitis is a major chronic respiratory disease and an immunoneuronal disorder. We aimed at providing further knowledge on the function of the neural system in nasal allergic reaction. Here, a method to assess simultaneously the nasal airflow resistance and the underlying function of autonomic nervous system (ANS) is presented and used during the nasal provocation of allergic and nonallergic subjects. Continuous nasal airflow resistance and spectral heart rate variability parameters show in detail the timing and intensity differences in subjects’ reactions. After the provocation, the nasal airflow resistance of allergic subjects showed a positive trend, whereas LF/HF (Low Frequency/High Frequency) ratio and LF power showed a negative trend. This could imply a gradual sympathetic withdrawal in allergic subjects after the allergen provocation. The groups differed significantly by these physiological descriptors. The proposed method opens entirely new opportunities to research accurately concomitant changes in nasal breathing function and ANS.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1245418
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tiina M. Seppänen
Olli-Pekka Alho
Tapio Seppänen
spellingShingle Tiina M. Seppänen
Olli-Pekka Alho
Tapio Seppänen
Dynamic Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Nasal Airflow Resistance during Nasal Allergen Provocation Test
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
author_facet Tiina M. Seppänen
Olli-Pekka Alho
Tapio Seppänen
author_sort Tiina M. Seppänen
title Dynamic Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Nasal Airflow Resistance during Nasal Allergen Provocation Test
title_short Dynamic Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Nasal Airflow Resistance during Nasal Allergen Provocation Test
title_full Dynamic Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Nasal Airflow Resistance during Nasal Allergen Provocation Test
title_fullStr Dynamic Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Nasal Airflow Resistance during Nasal Allergen Provocation Test
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Changes in Heart Rate Variability and Nasal Airflow Resistance during Nasal Allergen Provocation Test
title_sort dynamic changes in heart rate variability and nasal airflow resistance during nasal allergen provocation test
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Healthcare Engineering
issn 2040-2295
2040-2309
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Allergic rhinitis is a major chronic respiratory disease and an immunoneuronal disorder. We aimed at providing further knowledge on the function of the neural system in nasal allergic reaction. Here, a method to assess simultaneously the nasal airflow resistance and the underlying function of autonomic nervous system (ANS) is presented and used during the nasal provocation of allergic and nonallergic subjects. Continuous nasal airflow resistance and spectral heart rate variability parameters show in detail the timing and intensity differences in subjects’ reactions. After the provocation, the nasal airflow resistance of allergic subjects showed a positive trend, whereas LF/HF (Low Frequency/High Frequency) ratio and LF power showed a negative trend. This could imply a gradual sympathetic withdrawal in allergic subjects after the allergen provocation. The groups differed significantly by these physiological descriptors. The proposed method opens entirely new opportunities to research accurately concomitant changes in nasal breathing function and ANS.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1245418
work_keys_str_mv AT tiinamseppanen dynamicchangesinheartratevariabilityandnasalairflowresistanceduringnasalallergenprovocationtest
AT ollipekkaalho dynamicchangesinheartratevariabilityandnasalairflowresistanceduringnasalallergenprovocationtest
AT tapioseppanen dynamicchangesinheartratevariabilityandnasalairflowresistanceduringnasalallergenprovocationtest
_version_ 1725306614630580224