Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?
Introduction: Australia, but not New Zealand (NZ), has adopted the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes (GDM). We compared pregnancy outcomes using these different diagnostic approaches. Method: Prospective data of women...
Main Authors: | Lili Yuen, Vincent W. Wong, Louise Wolmarans, David Simmons |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4588 |
Similar Items
-
Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Risk Factors Diagnosed by IADPSG Criteria at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital
by: Kanjana Kanthiya, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Perinatal Outcomes in Mexican Women with Untreated Mild Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria
by: Martínez-Cruz N, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
by: Meena Bhatia, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Detected by International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) Criteria in Phramongkutklao Hospital
by: Rathawit Suntorn, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
Change in prevalence of gestational diabetes and obstetric complications when applying IADPSG screening criteria in a Belgian French speaking University Hospital. A retrospective cohort study
by: Elena Costa, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)