Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?
Introduction: Australia, but not New Zealand (NZ), has adopted the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes (GDM). We compared pregnancy outcomes using these different diagnostic approaches. Method: Prospective data of women...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4588 |
id |
doaj-5122f5ffab3a46c2885ea4220be391a2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5122f5ffab3a46c2885ea4220be391a22021-04-26T23:03:52ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-04-01184588458810.3390/ijerph18094588Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?Lili Yuen0Vincent W. Wong1Louise Wolmarans2David Simmons3School of Medicine and the Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, AustraliaSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW 2170, AustraliaWaikato District Health Board, Hamilton 3204, New ZealandSchool of Medicine and the Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, AustraliaIntroduction: Australia, but not New Zealand (NZ), has adopted the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes (GDM). We compared pregnancy outcomes using these different diagnostic approaches. Method: Prospective data of women with GDM were collected from one NZ (NZ) and one Australian (Aus) hospital between 2007–2018. Aus screening criteria with 2-step risk-based 50 g Glucose Challenge Testing (GCT) followed by 75 g-oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT): fasting ≥ 5.5, 2-h ≥ 8.0 mmol/L (ADIPS98) changed to a universal OGTT and fasting ≥5.1, 1-h ≥ 10, 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L (IADPSG). NZ used GCT followed by OGTT with fasting ≥ 5.5, 2-h ≥ 9.0 mmol/L (NZSSD); in 2015 adopted a booking HbA1c (NZMOH). Primary outcome was a composite of macrosomia, perinatal death, preterm delivery, neonatal hypoglycaemia, and phototherapy. An Aus subset positive using NZSSD was also defined. RESULTS: The composite outcome odds ratio compared to IADPSG (1788 pregnancies) was higher for NZMOH (934 pregnancies) 2.227 (95%CI: 1.84–2.68), NZSSD (1344 pregnancies) 2.19 (1.83–2.61), and ADIPS98 (3452 pregnancies) 1.91 (1.66–2.20). Composite outcomes were similar between the Aus subset and NZ. Conclusions: The IADPSG diagnostic criteria were associated with the lowest rate of composite outcomes. Earlier NZ screening with HbA1c was not associated with a change in adverse pregnancy outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4588gestational diabetesmultiethnicIADPSGperinatal outcomeshigh BMINew Zealand |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lili Yuen Vincent W. Wong Louise Wolmarans David Simmons |
spellingShingle |
Lili Yuen Vincent W. Wong Louise Wolmarans David Simmons Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health gestational diabetes multiethnic IADPSG perinatal outcomes high BMI New Zealand |
author_facet |
Lili Yuen Vincent W. Wong Louise Wolmarans David Simmons |
author_sort |
Lili Yuen |
title |
Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference? |
title_short |
Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference? |
title_full |
Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference? |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference? |
title_sort |
comparison of pregnancy outcomes using different gestational diabetes diagnostic criteria and treatment thresholds in multiethnic communities between two tertiary centres in australian and new zealand: do they make a difference? |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Introduction: Australia, but not New Zealand (NZ), has adopted the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes (GDM). We compared pregnancy outcomes using these different diagnostic approaches. Method: Prospective data of women with GDM were collected from one NZ (NZ) and one Australian (Aus) hospital between 2007–2018. Aus screening criteria with 2-step risk-based 50 g Glucose Challenge Testing (GCT) followed by 75 g-oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT): fasting ≥ 5.5, 2-h ≥ 8.0 mmol/L (ADIPS98) changed to a universal OGTT and fasting ≥5.1, 1-h ≥ 10, 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L (IADPSG). NZ used GCT followed by OGTT with fasting ≥ 5.5, 2-h ≥ 9.0 mmol/L (NZSSD); in 2015 adopted a booking HbA1c (NZMOH). Primary outcome was a composite of macrosomia, perinatal death, preterm delivery, neonatal hypoglycaemia, and phototherapy. An Aus subset positive using NZSSD was also defined. RESULTS: The composite outcome odds ratio compared to IADPSG (1788 pregnancies) was higher for NZMOH (934 pregnancies) 2.227 (95%CI: 1.84–2.68), NZSSD (1344 pregnancies) 2.19 (1.83–2.61), and ADIPS98 (3452 pregnancies) 1.91 (1.66–2.20). Composite outcomes were similar between the Aus subset and NZ. Conclusions: The IADPSG diagnostic criteria were associated with the lowest rate of composite outcomes. Earlier NZ screening with HbA1c was not associated with a change in adverse pregnancy outcomes. |
topic |
gestational diabetes multiethnic IADPSG perinatal outcomes high BMI New Zealand |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4588 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT liliyuen comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingdifferentgestationaldiabetesdiagnosticcriteriaandtreatmentthresholdsinmultiethniccommunitiesbetweentwotertiarycentresinaustralianandnewzealanddotheymakeadifference AT vincentwwong comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingdifferentgestationaldiabetesdiagnosticcriteriaandtreatmentthresholdsinmultiethniccommunitiesbetweentwotertiarycentresinaustralianandnewzealanddotheymakeadifference AT louisewolmarans comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingdifferentgestationaldiabetesdiagnosticcriteriaandtreatmentthresholdsinmultiethniccommunitiesbetweentwotertiarycentresinaustralianandnewzealanddotheymakeadifference AT davidsimmons comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingdifferentgestationaldiabetesdiagnosticcriteriaandtreatmentthresholdsinmultiethniccommunitiesbetweentwotertiarycentresinaustralianandnewzealanddotheymakeadifference |
_version_ |
1721507226566262784 |