Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?

Introduction: Australia, but not New Zealand (NZ), has adopted the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes (GDM). We compared pregnancy outcomes using these different diagnostic approaches. Method: Prospective data of women...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lili Yuen, Vincent W. Wong, Louise Wolmarans, David Simmons
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4588
id doaj-5122f5ffab3a46c2885ea4220be391a2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5122f5ffab3a46c2885ea4220be391a22021-04-26T23:03:52ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-04-01184588458810.3390/ijerph18094588Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?Lili Yuen0Vincent W. Wong1Louise Wolmarans2David Simmons3School of Medicine and the Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, AustraliaSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW 2170, AustraliaWaikato District Health Board, Hamilton 3204, New ZealandSchool of Medicine and the Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, AustraliaIntroduction: Australia, but not New Zealand (NZ), has adopted the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes (GDM). We compared pregnancy outcomes using these different diagnostic approaches. Method: Prospective data of women with GDM were collected from one NZ (NZ) and one Australian (Aus) hospital between 2007–2018. Aus screening criteria with 2-step risk-based 50 g Glucose Challenge Testing (GCT) followed by 75 g-oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT): fasting ≥ 5.5, 2-h ≥ 8.0 mmol/L (ADIPS98) changed to a universal OGTT and fasting ≥5.1, 1-h ≥ 10, 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L (IADPSG). NZ used GCT followed by OGTT with fasting ≥ 5.5, 2-h ≥ 9.0 mmol/L (NZSSD); in 2015 adopted a booking HbA1c (NZMOH). Primary outcome was a composite of macrosomia, perinatal death, preterm delivery, neonatal hypoglycaemia, and phototherapy. An Aus subset positive using NZSSD was also defined. RESULTS: The composite outcome odds ratio compared to IADPSG (1788 pregnancies) was higher for NZMOH (934 pregnancies) 2.227 (95%CI: 1.84–2.68), NZSSD (1344 pregnancies) 2.19 (1.83–2.61), and ADIPS98 (3452 pregnancies) 1.91 (1.66–2.20). Composite outcomes were similar between the Aus subset and NZ. Conclusions: The IADPSG diagnostic criteria were associated with the lowest rate of composite outcomes. Earlier NZ screening with HbA1c was not associated with a change in adverse pregnancy outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4588gestational diabetesmultiethnicIADPSGperinatal outcomeshigh BMINew Zealand
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lili Yuen
Vincent W. Wong
Louise Wolmarans
David Simmons
spellingShingle Lili Yuen
Vincent W. Wong
Louise Wolmarans
David Simmons
Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
gestational diabetes
multiethnic
IADPSG
perinatal outcomes
high BMI
New Zealand
author_facet Lili Yuen
Vincent W. Wong
Louise Wolmarans
David Simmons
author_sort Lili Yuen
title Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?
title_short Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?
title_full Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?
title_fullStr Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Using Different Gestational Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Thresholds in Multiethnic Communities between Two Tertiary Centres in Australian and New Zealand: Do They Make a Difference?
title_sort comparison of pregnancy outcomes using different gestational diabetes diagnostic criteria and treatment thresholds in multiethnic communities between two tertiary centres in australian and new zealand: do they make a difference?
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Introduction: Australia, but not New Zealand (NZ), has adopted the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes (GDM). We compared pregnancy outcomes using these different diagnostic approaches. Method: Prospective data of women with GDM were collected from one NZ (NZ) and one Australian (Aus) hospital between 2007–2018. Aus screening criteria with 2-step risk-based 50 g Glucose Challenge Testing (GCT) followed by 75 g-oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT): fasting ≥ 5.5, 2-h ≥ 8.0 mmol/L (ADIPS98) changed to a universal OGTT and fasting ≥5.1, 1-h ≥ 10, 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L (IADPSG). NZ used GCT followed by OGTT with fasting ≥ 5.5, 2-h ≥ 9.0 mmol/L (NZSSD); in 2015 adopted a booking HbA1c (NZMOH). Primary outcome was a composite of macrosomia, perinatal death, preterm delivery, neonatal hypoglycaemia, and phototherapy. An Aus subset positive using NZSSD was also defined. RESULTS: The composite outcome odds ratio compared to IADPSG (1788 pregnancies) was higher for NZMOH (934 pregnancies) 2.227 (95%CI: 1.84–2.68), NZSSD (1344 pregnancies) 2.19 (1.83–2.61), and ADIPS98 (3452 pregnancies) 1.91 (1.66–2.20). Composite outcomes were similar between the Aus subset and NZ. Conclusions: The IADPSG diagnostic criteria were associated with the lowest rate of composite outcomes. Earlier NZ screening with HbA1c was not associated with a change in adverse pregnancy outcomes.
topic gestational diabetes
multiethnic
IADPSG
perinatal outcomes
high BMI
New Zealand
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4588
work_keys_str_mv AT liliyuen comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingdifferentgestationaldiabetesdiagnosticcriteriaandtreatmentthresholdsinmultiethniccommunitiesbetweentwotertiarycentresinaustralianandnewzealanddotheymakeadifference
AT vincentwwong comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingdifferentgestationaldiabetesdiagnosticcriteriaandtreatmentthresholdsinmultiethniccommunitiesbetweentwotertiarycentresinaustralianandnewzealanddotheymakeadifference
AT louisewolmarans comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingdifferentgestationaldiabetesdiagnosticcriteriaandtreatmentthresholdsinmultiethniccommunitiesbetweentwotertiarycentresinaustralianandnewzealanddotheymakeadifference
AT davidsimmons comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingdifferentgestationaldiabetesdiagnosticcriteriaandtreatmentthresholdsinmultiethniccommunitiesbetweentwotertiarycentresinaustralianandnewzealanddotheymakeadifference
_version_ 1721507226566262784