Effectiveness of Alberta Family Integrated Care on infant length of stay in level II neonatal intensive care units: a cluster randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background Parents of infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are often unintentionally marginalized in pursuit of optimal clinical care. Family Integrated Care (FICare) was developed to support families as part of their infants’ care team in level III NICUs. We adapted the model f...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Pediatrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02438-6 |
id |
doaj-511fdb86f31b4e12b073c83814e1f68d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Karen M. Benzies Khalid Aziz Vibhuti Shah Peter Faris Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai Jeanne Scotland Jill Larocque Kelly J. Mrklas Christopher Naugler H. Thomas Stelfox Radha Chari Amuchou Singh Soraisham Albert Richard Akierman Ernest Phillipos Harish Amin Jeffrey S. Hoch Pilar Zanoni Jana Kurilova Abhay Lodha the Alberta FICare Level II NICU Study Team |
spellingShingle |
Karen M. Benzies Khalid Aziz Vibhuti Shah Peter Faris Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai Jeanne Scotland Jill Larocque Kelly J. Mrklas Christopher Naugler H. Thomas Stelfox Radha Chari Amuchou Singh Soraisham Albert Richard Akierman Ernest Phillipos Harish Amin Jeffrey S. Hoch Pilar Zanoni Jana Kurilova Abhay Lodha the Alberta FICare Level II NICU Study Team Effectiveness of Alberta Family Integrated Care on infant length of stay in level II neonatal intensive care units: a cluster randomized controlled trial BMC Pediatrics Family integrated care Preterm infant Neonatal intensive care unit Length of stay Family centered care Bundled model of care |
author_facet |
Karen M. Benzies Khalid Aziz Vibhuti Shah Peter Faris Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai Jeanne Scotland Jill Larocque Kelly J. Mrklas Christopher Naugler H. Thomas Stelfox Radha Chari Amuchou Singh Soraisham Albert Richard Akierman Ernest Phillipos Harish Amin Jeffrey S. Hoch Pilar Zanoni Jana Kurilova Abhay Lodha the Alberta FICare Level II NICU Study Team |
author_sort |
Karen M. Benzies |
title |
Effectiveness of Alberta Family Integrated Care on infant length of stay in level II neonatal intensive care units: a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
Effectiveness of Alberta Family Integrated Care on infant length of stay in level II neonatal intensive care units: a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Effectiveness of Alberta Family Integrated Care on infant length of stay in level II neonatal intensive care units: a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness of Alberta Family Integrated Care on infant length of stay in level II neonatal intensive care units: a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness of Alberta Family Integrated Care on infant length of stay in level II neonatal intensive care units: a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
effectiveness of alberta family integrated care on infant length of stay in level ii neonatal intensive care units: a cluster randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Pediatrics |
issn |
1471-2431 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Parents of infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are often unintentionally marginalized in pursuit of optimal clinical care. Family Integrated Care (FICare) was developed to support families as part of their infants’ care team in level III NICUs. We adapted the model for level II NICUs in Alberta, Canada, and evaluated whether the new Alberta FICare™ model decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) in preterm infants without concomitant increases in readmissions and emergency department visits. Methods In this pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial conducted between December 15, 2015 and July 28, 2018, 10 level II NICUs were randomized to provide Alberta FICare™ (n = 5) or standard care (n = 5). Alberta FICare™ is a psychoeducational intervention with 3 components: Relational Communication, Parent Education, and Parent Support. We enrolled mothers and their singleton or twin infants born between 32 0/7 and 34 6/7 weeks gestation. The primary outcome was infant hospital LOS. We used a linear regression model to conduct weighted site-level analysis comparing adjusted mean LOS between groups, accounting for site geographic area (urban/regional) and infant risk factors. Secondary outcomes included proportions of infants with readmissions and emergency department visits to 2 months corrected age, type of feeding at discharge, and maternal psychosocial distress and parenting self-efficacy at discharge. Results We enrolled 654 mothers and 765 infants (543 singletons/111 twin cases). Intention to treat analysis included 353 infants/308 mothers in the Alberta FICare™ group and 365 infants/306 mothers in the standard care group. The unadjusted difference between groups in infant hospital LOS (1.96 days) was not statistically significant. Accounting for site geographic area and infant risk factors, infant hospital LOS was 2.55 days shorter (95% CI, − 4.44 to − 0.66) in the Alberta FICare™ group than standard care group, P = .02. Secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions Alberta FICare™ is effective in reducing preterm infant LOS in level II NICUs, without concomitant increases in readmissions or emergency department visits. A small number of sites in a single jurisdiction and select group infants limit generalizability of findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02879799 , retrospectively registered August 26, 2016. |
topic |
Family integrated care Preterm infant Neonatal intensive care unit Length of stay Family centered care Bundled model of care |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02438-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT karenmbenzies effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT khalidaziz effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vibhutishah effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT peterfaris effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wanrudeeisaranuwatchai effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jeannescotland effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jilllarocque effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kellyjmrklas effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT christophernaugler effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hthomasstelfox effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT radhachari effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT amuchousinghsoraisham effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT albertrichardakierman effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ernestphillipos effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT harishamin effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jeffreyshoch effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pilarzanoni effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT janakurilova effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT abhaylodha effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thealbertaficareleveliinicustudyteam effectivenessofalbertafamilyintegratedcareoninfantlengthofstayinleveliineonatalintensivecareunitsaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1724412259389669376 |
spelling |
doaj-511fdb86f31b4e12b073c83814e1f68d2020-11-29T12:08:26ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312020-11-0120111110.1186/s12887-020-02438-6Effectiveness of Alberta Family Integrated Care on infant length of stay in level II neonatal intensive care units: a cluster randomized controlled trialKaren M. Benzies0Khalid Aziz1Vibhuti Shah2Peter Faris3Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai4Jeanne Scotland5Jill Larocque6Kelly J. Mrklas7Christopher Naugler8H. Thomas Stelfox9Radha Chari10Amuchou Singh Soraisham11Albert Richard Akierman12Ernest Phillipos13Harish Amin14Jeffrey S. Hoch15Pilar Zanoni16Jana Kurilova17Abhay Lodha18the Alberta FICare Level II NICU Study TeamFaculty of Nursing, University of CalgaryFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Mount Sinai HospitalCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of TorontoNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Rockyview General Hospital, Alberta Health ServicesNorthern Alberta Neonatal Program, Stollery Children’s HospitalStrategic Clinical Networks™, System Innovation and Programs, Alberta Health ServicesCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of California DavisFaculty of Nursing, University of CalgaryFaculty of Nursing, University of CalgaryCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryAbstract Background Parents of infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are often unintentionally marginalized in pursuit of optimal clinical care. Family Integrated Care (FICare) was developed to support families as part of their infants’ care team in level III NICUs. We adapted the model for level II NICUs in Alberta, Canada, and evaluated whether the new Alberta FICare™ model decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) in preterm infants without concomitant increases in readmissions and emergency department visits. Methods In this pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial conducted between December 15, 2015 and July 28, 2018, 10 level II NICUs were randomized to provide Alberta FICare™ (n = 5) or standard care (n = 5). Alberta FICare™ is a psychoeducational intervention with 3 components: Relational Communication, Parent Education, and Parent Support. We enrolled mothers and their singleton or twin infants born between 32 0/7 and 34 6/7 weeks gestation. The primary outcome was infant hospital LOS. We used a linear regression model to conduct weighted site-level analysis comparing adjusted mean LOS between groups, accounting for site geographic area (urban/regional) and infant risk factors. Secondary outcomes included proportions of infants with readmissions and emergency department visits to 2 months corrected age, type of feeding at discharge, and maternal psychosocial distress and parenting self-efficacy at discharge. Results We enrolled 654 mothers and 765 infants (543 singletons/111 twin cases). Intention to treat analysis included 353 infants/308 mothers in the Alberta FICare™ group and 365 infants/306 mothers in the standard care group. The unadjusted difference between groups in infant hospital LOS (1.96 days) was not statistically significant. Accounting for site geographic area and infant risk factors, infant hospital LOS was 2.55 days shorter (95% CI, − 4.44 to − 0.66) in the Alberta FICare™ group than standard care group, P = .02. Secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions Alberta FICare™ is effective in reducing preterm infant LOS in level II NICUs, without concomitant increases in readmissions or emergency department visits. A small number of sites in a single jurisdiction and select group infants limit generalizability of findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02879799 , retrospectively registered August 26, 2016.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02438-6Family integrated carePreterm infantNeonatal intensive care unitLength of stayFamily centered careBundled model of care |