The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We sought to determine whether a multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing direct access to scheduling screening tests through standin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Griffith Jennifer M, Brenner Alison T, Lewis Carmen L, Pignone Michael P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-06-01
Series:Implementation Science
Online Access:http://www.implementationscience.com/content/3/1/32
id doaj-5115e57184864c75a4bff4bac14f6fbc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5115e57184864c75a4bff4bac14f6fbc2020-11-24T21:15:43ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082008-06-01313210.1186/1748-5908-3-32The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trialGriffith Jennifer MBrenner Alison TLewis Carmen LPignone Michael P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We sought to determine whether a multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing direct access to scheduling screening tests through standing orders, would be an effective and efficient means of promoting colon cancer screening in primary care practice.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a controlled trial comparing the proportion of intervention patients who received colon cancer screening with wait list controls at one practice site. The intervention was a mailed package that included a letter from their primary care physician, a colon cancer screening decision aid, and instructions for obtaining each screening test without an office visit so that patients could access screening tests directly. Major outcomes were screening test completion and cost per additional patient screened.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In the intervention group, 15% (20/137) were screened versus 4% (4/100) in the control group (difference 11%; (95%; CI 3%;18% p = 0.01). The cost per additional patient screened was estimated to be $94.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing patients direct access to schedule screening tests, increased colon cancer screening test completion in a subset of patients within a single academic practice. Although the uptake of the decision aid was low, the cost was also modest, suggesting that this method could be a viable approach to colon cancer screening.</p> http://www.implementationscience.com/content/3/1/32
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Griffith Jennifer M
Brenner Alison T
Lewis Carmen L
Pignone Michael P
spellingShingle Griffith Jennifer M
Brenner Alison T
Lewis Carmen L
Pignone Michael P
The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
Implementation Science
author_facet Griffith Jennifer M
Brenner Alison T
Lewis Carmen L
Pignone Michael P
author_sort Griffith Jennifer M
title The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title_short The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title_full The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title_fullStr The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title_sort uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: a pilot controlled trial
publisher BMC
series Implementation Science
issn 1748-5908
publishDate 2008-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We sought to determine whether a multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing direct access to scheduling screening tests through standing orders, would be an effective and efficient means of promoting colon cancer screening in primary care practice.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a controlled trial comparing the proportion of intervention patients who received colon cancer screening with wait list controls at one practice site. The intervention was a mailed package that included a letter from their primary care physician, a colon cancer screening decision aid, and instructions for obtaining each screening test without an office visit so that patients could access screening tests directly. Major outcomes were screening test completion and cost per additional patient screened.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In the intervention group, 15% (20/137) were screened versus 4% (4/100) in the control group (difference 11%; (95%; CI 3%;18% p = 0.01). The cost per additional patient screened was estimated to be $94.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing patients direct access to schedule screening tests, increased colon cancer screening test completion in a subset of patients within a single academic practice. Although the uptake of the decision aid was low, the cost was also modest, suggesting that this method could be a viable approach to colon cancer screening.</p>
url http://www.implementationscience.com/content/3/1/32
work_keys_str_mv AT griffithjenniferm theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT brenneralisont theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT lewiscarmenl theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT pignonemichaelp theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT griffithjenniferm uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT brenneralisont uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT lewiscarmenl uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT pignonemichaelp uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1716744317484138496