Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period

The year 1917 ist still widely accepted as a caesura of global history, according to the emerging of the USA as a world power and to the „world revolution“, arising from Russia as a threat to almost all societies in europe and the western world. Normally, the german historian Hans Rothfels ist name...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marc von Knorring
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta 2018-12-01
Series:Prague Papers on the History of International Relations
Subjects:
USA
Online Access:https://praguepapers.ff.cuni.cz/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2018/12/Marc_von_Knorring_78-91.pdf
id doaj-510e5c0c2788406ab1a55701d6101a7f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-510e5c0c2788406ab1a55701d6101a7f2020-11-25T02:15:40ZdeuUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultaPrague Papers on the History of International Relations1803-73562336-71052018-12-0127891Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War PeriodMarc von Knorring0Lehrstuhl für Neuere und Neueste Geschichte, Universität PassauThe year 1917 ist still widely accepted as a caesura of global history, according to the emerging of the USA as a world power and to the „world revolution“, arising from Russia as a threat to almost all societies in europe and the western world. Normally, the german historian Hans Rothfels ist named to be the first having defined this caesura at the beginning of the 1950s. But has he really been the first to do so, and was the ending of the Second World War a condition sine qua non for those thoughts? The article shows, that several inter-war historians dealt with the question of the meaning of „1917“ for global history, that some of them already drew conclusions very near to Rothfels’s considerations and that actually one of them — Paul Schmitthenner — forestalled his deliberations about 20 years before him.https://praguepapers.ff.cuni.cz/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2018/12/Marc_von_Knorring_78-91.pdfglobal caesura 1917world powersworld revolutionUSARussiahistoriography of the inter-war periodHans RothfelsPaul Schmitthenner
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marc von Knorring
spellingShingle Marc von Knorring
Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period
Prague Papers on the History of International Relations
global caesura 1917
world powers
world revolution
USA
Russia
historiography of the inter-war period
Hans Rothfels
Paul Schmitthenner
author_facet Marc von Knorring
author_sort Marc von Knorring
title Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period
title_short Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period
title_full Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period
title_fullStr Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period
title_full_unstemmed Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period
title_sort weltmächte und weltrevolution: das jahr 1917 als globale zäsur in der historiographie der zwischenkriegszeit || world powers and world revolution: the year 1917 as a global caesura in the historiography of the inter-war period
publisher Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta
series Prague Papers on the History of International Relations
issn 1803-7356
2336-7105
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The year 1917 ist still widely accepted as a caesura of global history, according to the emerging of the USA as a world power and to the „world revolution“, arising from Russia as a threat to almost all societies in europe and the western world. Normally, the german historian Hans Rothfels ist named to be the first having defined this caesura at the beginning of the 1950s. But has he really been the first to do so, and was the ending of the Second World War a condition sine qua non for those thoughts? The article shows, that several inter-war historians dealt with the question of the meaning of „1917“ for global history, that some of them already drew conclusions very near to Rothfels’s considerations and that actually one of them — Paul Schmitthenner — forestalled his deliberations about 20 years before him.
topic global caesura 1917
world powers
world revolution
USA
Russia
historiography of the inter-war period
Hans Rothfels
Paul Schmitthenner
url https://praguepapers.ff.cuni.cz/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2018/12/Marc_von_Knorring_78-91.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT marcvonknorring weltmachteundweltrevolutiondasjahr1917alsglobalezasurinderhistoriographiederzwischenkriegszeitworldpowersandworldrevolutiontheyear1917asaglobalcaesurainthehistoriographyoftheinterwarperiod
_version_ 1724894729099804672