Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period
The year 1917 ist still widely accepted as a caesura of global history, according to the emerging of the USA as a world power and to the „world revolution“, arising from Russia as a threat to almost all societies in europe and the western world. Normally, the german historian Hans Rothfels ist name...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Prague Papers on the History of International Relations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://praguepapers.ff.cuni.cz/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2018/12/Marc_von_Knorring_78-91.pdf |
id |
doaj-510e5c0c2788406ab1a55701d6101a7f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-510e5c0c2788406ab1a55701d6101a7f2020-11-25T02:15:40ZdeuUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultaPrague Papers on the History of International Relations1803-73562336-71052018-12-0127891Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War PeriodMarc von Knorring0Lehrstuhl für Neuere und Neueste Geschichte, Universität PassauThe year 1917 ist still widely accepted as a caesura of global history, according to the emerging of the USA as a world power and to the „world revolution“, arising from Russia as a threat to almost all societies in europe and the western world. Normally, the german historian Hans Rothfels ist named to be the first having defined this caesura at the beginning of the 1950s. But has he really been the first to do so, and was the ending of the Second World War a condition sine qua non for those thoughts? The article shows, that several inter-war historians dealt with the question of the meaning of „1917“ for global history, that some of them already drew conclusions very near to Rothfels’s considerations and that actually one of them — Paul Schmitthenner — forestalled his deliberations about 20 years before him.https://praguepapers.ff.cuni.cz/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2018/12/Marc_von_Knorring_78-91.pdfglobal caesura 1917world powersworld revolutionUSARussiahistoriography of the inter-war periodHans RothfelsPaul Schmitthenner |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marc von Knorring |
spellingShingle |
Marc von Knorring Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period Prague Papers on the History of International Relations global caesura 1917 world powers world revolution USA Russia historiography of the inter-war period Hans Rothfels Paul Schmitthenner |
author_facet |
Marc von Knorring |
author_sort |
Marc von Knorring |
title |
Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period |
title_short |
Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period |
title_full |
Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period |
title_fullStr |
Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period |
title_full_unstemmed |
Weltmächte und Weltrevolution: Das Jahr 1917 als globale Zäsur in der Historiographie der Zwischenkriegszeit || World Powers and World Revolution: The Year 1917 as a Global Caesura in the Historiography of the Inter-War Period |
title_sort |
weltmächte und weltrevolution: das jahr 1917 als globale zäsur in der historiographie der zwischenkriegszeit || world powers and world revolution: the year 1917 as a global caesura in the historiography of the inter-war period |
publisher |
Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta |
series |
Prague Papers on the History of International Relations |
issn |
1803-7356 2336-7105 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
The year 1917 ist still widely accepted as a caesura of global history, according to the emerging of the
USA as a world power and to the „world revolution“, arising from Russia as a threat to almost all societies in europe and the western world. Normally, the german historian Hans Rothfels ist named to
be the first having defined this caesura at the beginning of the 1950s. But has he really been the first
to do so, and was the ending of the Second World War a condition sine qua non for those thoughts?
The article shows, that several inter-war historians dealt with the question of the meaning of „1917“
for global history, that some of them already drew conclusions very near to Rothfels’s considerations
and that actually one of them — Paul Schmitthenner — forestalled his deliberations about 20 years
before him. |
topic |
global caesura 1917 world powers world revolution USA Russia historiography of the inter-war period Hans Rothfels Paul Schmitthenner |
url |
https://praguepapers.ff.cuni.cz/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2018/12/Marc_von_Knorring_78-91.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcvonknorring weltmachteundweltrevolutiondasjahr1917alsglobalezasurinderhistoriographiederzwischenkriegszeitworldpowersandworldrevolutiontheyear1917asaglobalcaesurainthehistoriographyoftheinterwarperiod |
_version_ |
1724894729099804672 |