<it>E2F1 </it>and <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression predicts breast cancer patient survival

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene expression profiling of human breast tumors has uncovered several molecular signatures that can divide breast cancer patients into good and poor outcome groups. However, these signatures typically comprise many genes (~50-100),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hassell John A, Hallett Robin M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-03-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/4/95
id doaj-510c4f999ad54835b7792feb89f77df4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-510c4f999ad54835b7792feb89f77df42020-11-25T01:29:04ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002011-03-01419510.1186/1756-0500-4-95<it>E2F1 </it>and <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression predicts breast cancer patient survivalHassell John AHallett Robin M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene expression profiling of human breast tumors has uncovered several molecular signatures that can divide breast cancer patients into good and poor outcome groups. However, these signatures typically comprise many genes (~50-100), and the prognostic tests associated with identifying these signatures in patient tumor specimens require complicated methods, which are not routinely available in most hospital pathology laboratories, thus limiting their use. Hence, there is a need for more practical methods to predict patient survival.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We modified a feature selection algorithm and used survival analysis to derive a 2-gene signature that accurately predicts breast cancer patient survival.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We developed a tree based decision method that segregated patients into various risk groups using <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression in the context of <it>E2F1 </it>expression levels. This approach led to highly accurate survival predictions in a large cohort of breast cancer patients using only a 2-gene signature.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our observations suggest a possible relationship between <it>E2F1 </it>and <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression that is relevant to the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Furthermore, our findings raise the prospect that the practicality of patient prognosis methods may be improved by reducing the number of genes required for analysis. Indeed, our <it>E2F1/KIAA0191 </it>2-gene signature would be highly amenable for an immunohistochemistry based test, which is commonly used in hospital laboratories.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/4/95
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hassell John A
Hallett Robin M
spellingShingle Hassell John A
Hallett Robin M
<it>E2F1 </it>and <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression predicts breast cancer patient survival
BMC Research Notes
author_facet Hassell John A
Hallett Robin M
author_sort Hassell John A
title <it>E2F1 </it>and <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression predicts breast cancer patient survival
title_short <it>E2F1 </it>and <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression predicts breast cancer patient survival
title_full <it>E2F1 </it>and <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression predicts breast cancer patient survival
title_fullStr <it>E2F1 </it>and <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression predicts breast cancer patient survival
title_full_unstemmed <it>E2F1 </it>and <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression predicts breast cancer patient survival
title_sort <it>e2f1 </it>and <it>kiaa0191 </it>expression predicts breast cancer patient survival
publisher BMC
series BMC Research Notes
issn 1756-0500
publishDate 2011-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene expression profiling of human breast tumors has uncovered several molecular signatures that can divide breast cancer patients into good and poor outcome groups. However, these signatures typically comprise many genes (~50-100), and the prognostic tests associated with identifying these signatures in patient tumor specimens require complicated methods, which are not routinely available in most hospital pathology laboratories, thus limiting their use. Hence, there is a need for more practical methods to predict patient survival.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We modified a feature selection algorithm and used survival analysis to derive a 2-gene signature that accurately predicts breast cancer patient survival.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We developed a tree based decision method that segregated patients into various risk groups using <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression in the context of <it>E2F1 </it>expression levels. This approach led to highly accurate survival predictions in a large cohort of breast cancer patients using only a 2-gene signature.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our observations suggest a possible relationship between <it>E2F1 </it>and <it>KIAA0191 </it>expression that is relevant to the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Furthermore, our findings raise the prospect that the practicality of patient prognosis methods may be improved by reducing the number of genes required for analysis. Indeed, our <it>E2F1/KIAA0191 </it>2-gene signature would be highly amenable for an immunohistochemistry based test, which is commonly used in hospital laboratories.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/4/95
work_keys_str_mv AT hasselljohna ite2f1itanditkiaa0191itexpressionpredictsbreastcancerpatientsurvival
AT hallettrobinm ite2f1itanditkiaa0191itexpressionpredictsbreastcancerpatientsurvival
_version_ 1725098789592629248