Single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy: How I do it
<b>Introduction</b> : Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) appendectomy seeks to further minimise the trauma of parietal access of laparoscopic appendectomy. <b>Methods:</b> We present our initial experience of 17 cases of SILS appendectomy which were completed using c...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2011-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Minimal Access Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2011;volume=7;issue=1;spage=28;epage=32;aulast=Bhatia |
id |
doaj-51089af971884cc3966f141899ae0a5f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-51089af971884cc3966f141899ae0a5f2020-11-24T23:40:19ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99411998-39212011-01-01712832Single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy: How I do itBhatia ParveenSabharwal VinayKalhan SudhirJohn SuvirajDeed JagpreetKhetan Mukund<b>Introduction</b> : Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) appendectomy seeks to further minimise the trauma of parietal access of laparoscopic appendectomy. <b>Methods:</b> We present our initial experience of 17 cases of SILS appendectomy which were completed using conventional laparoscopic instruments. We utiliesd a single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SIMPLA) technique. <b>Results:</b> The operative time was 63 ± 20 min, blood loss 6.5 ± 5 mL, bowel movement (passing stool) occurred in 2.6 ± 0.6 days. Most patients were discharged on the first operative day on oral diet. The analgesic usage and pain scores were similar to multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy. No complications were noted at follow-up till 4 weeks and the surgical wound healed in all patients with an inconspicuous scar. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our initial experience with SILS appendectomy demonstrates its feasibility and supports the promise of minimising further the access of laparoscopic surgery. The clear advantage is its cosmetic benefit.http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2011;volume=7;issue=1;spage=28;epage=32;aulast=BhatiaSingle-incision laparoscopic surgerysingle access laparoscopic surgeryappendectomyappendicectomysingle port access surgery |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bhatia Parveen Sabharwal Vinay Kalhan Sudhir John Suviraj Deed Jagpreet Khetan Mukund |
spellingShingle |
Bhatia Parveen Sabharwal Vinay Kalhan Sudhir John Suviraj Deed Jagpreet Khetan Mukund Single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy: How I do it Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Single-incision laparoscopic surgery single access laparoscopic surgery appendectomy appendicectomy single port access surgery |
author_facet |
Bhatia Parveen Sabharwal Vinay Kalhan Sudhir John Suviraj Deed Jagpreet Khetan Mukund |
author_sort |
Bhatia Parveen |
title |
Single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy: How I do it |
title_short |
Single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy: How I do it |
title_full |
Single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy: How I do it |
title_fullStr |
Single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy: How I do it |
title_full_unstemmed |
Single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy: How I do it |
title_sort |
single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy: how i do it |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery |
issn |
0972-9941 1998-3921 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
<b>Introduction</b> : Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) appendectomy seeks to further minimise the trauma of parietal access of laparoscopic appendectomy. <b>Methods:</b> We present our initial experience of 17 cases of SILS appendectomy which were completed using conventional laparoscopic instruments. We utiliesd a single-incision multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SIMPLA) technique. <b>Results:</b> The operative time was 63 ± 20 min, blood loss 6.5 ± 5 mL, bowel movement (passing stool) occurred in 2.6 ± 0.6 days. Most patients were discharged on the first operative day on oral diet. The analgesic usage and pain scores were similar to multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy. No complications were noted at follow-up till 4 weeks and the surgical wound healed in all patients with an inconspicuous scar. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our initial experience with SILS appendectomy demonstrates its feasibility and supports the promise of minimising further the access of laparoscopic surgery. The clear advantage is its cosmetic benefit. |
topic |
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery single access laparoscopic surgery appendectomy appendicectomy single port access surgery |
url |
http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2011;volume=7;issue=1;spage=28;epage=32;aulast=Bhatia |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bhatiaparveen singleincisionmultiportlaparoscopicappendectomyhowidoit AT sabharwalvinay singleincisionmultiportlaparoscopicappendectomyhowidoit AT kalhansudhir singleincisionmultiportlaparoscopicappendectomyhowidoit AT johnsuviraj singleincisionmultiportlaparoscopicappendectomyhowidoit AT deedjagpreet singleincisionmultiportlaparoscopicappendectomyhowidoit AT khetanmukund singleincisionmultiportlaparoscopicappendectomyhowidoit |
_version_ |
1725510068744486912 |