Silence intérieur et machineries de la communication au xixe siècle

Bourgeois interiors in the 19th century became shrines of silence. Social distinction: at the opposite of the noisy apartments in working-class districts, appartements in bourgeois district were quiet. Private archives, patents and practical manuals underline that this construction was material. Sil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Manuel Charpy
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Éditions de la Sorbonne 2020-06-01
Series:Socio-anthropologie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/socio-anthropologie/6561
id doaj-5107071699ad4cfa913765a9f5370020
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5107071699ad4cfa913765a9f53700202020-11-25T03:14:05ZfraÉditions de la SorbonneSocio-anthropologie1276-87072020-06-0141233810.4000/socio-anthropologie.6561Silence intérieur et machineries de la communication au xixe siècleManuel CharpyBourgeois interiors in the 19th century became shrines of silence. Social distinction: at the opposite of the noisy apartments in working-class districts, appartements in bourgeois district were quiet. Private archives, patents and practical manuals underline that this construction was material. Silence is won and defended by devices that created systems. They shutt off noises from outside and neighbors and controled interior sounds. On the one hand, bourgeois caulked doors and windows, installed acoustic walls and double glazing and installed intercom systems that put the street at a distance. On the other hand, great care was taken to muffle interior noises. The bourgeois world was hushed in the strict sense: slippers under the feet, underlays under the carpets, mutes on the pianos, upholstery at the doors of rooms... The commandment of the popular bodies of the servants had also to be done in silence. The apartment was crossed by complex systems. Speaking tubes, mechanical or electric wires, bells then silent semaphores silently choreographed domestic life. Silence was a control of the bodies, prohibiting posturing, abruptness and cacophony. Silence and whispers become the condition of the bourgeois intimacy, as if the inner monologue requires the silence of others.http://journals.openedition.org/socio-anthropologie/6561homebourgeoisieservantsemaphorebellsilence
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manuel Charpy
spellingShingle Manuel Charpy
Silence intérieur et machineries de la communication au xixe siècle
Socio-anthropologie
home
bourgeoisie
servant
semaphore
bell
silence
author_facet Manuel Charpy
author_sort Manuel Charpy
title Silence intérieur et machineries de la communication au xixe siècle
title_short Silence intérieur et machineries de la communication au xixe siècle
title_full Silence intérieur et machineries de la communication au xixe siècle
title_fullStr Silence intérieur et machineries de la communication au xixe siècle
title_full_unstemmed Silence intérieur et machineries de la communication au xixe siècle
title_sort silence intérieur et machineries de la communication au xixe siècle
publisher Éditions de la Sorbonne
series Socio-anthropologie
issn 1276-8707
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Bourgeois interiors in the 19th century became shrines of silence. Social distinction: at the opposite of the noisy apartments in working-class districts, appartements in bourgeois district were quiet. Private archives, patents and practical manuals underline that this construction was material. Silence is won and defended by devices that created systems. They shutt off noises from outside and neighbors and controled interior sounds. On the one hand, bourgeois caulked doors and windows, installed acoustic walls and double glazing and installed intercom systems that put the street at a distance. On the other hand, great care was taken to muffle interior noises. The bourgeois world was hushed in the strict sense: slippers under the feet, underlays under the carpets, mutes on the pianos, upholstery at the doors of rooms... The commandment of the popular bodies of the servants had also to be done in silence. The apartment was crossed by complex systems. Speaking tubes, mechanical or electric wires, bells then silent semaphores silently choreographed domestic life. Silence was a control of the bodies, prohibiting posturing, abruptness and cacophony. Silence and whispers become the condition of the bourgeois intimacy, as if the inner monologue requires the silence of others.
topic home
bourgeoisie
servant
semaphore
bell
silence
url http://journals.openedition.org/socio-anthropologie/6561
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelcharpy silenceinterieuretmachineriesdelacommunicationauxixesiecle
_version_ 1724644505232080896