Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States

• Main Authors: Koski Kathryn, Collins Dayne, Chesson Harrell W
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2008-05-01
• Series: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
• Online Access: http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/6/1/10

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs can mitigate the health and economic burden of STIs. A tool to estimate the economic benefits of STI programs could prove useful to STI program personnel.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We developed formulas that can be applied to estimate the direct medical costs and indirect costs (lost productivity) averted by STI programs in the United States. Costs and probabilities for these formulas were based primarily on published studies.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We present a series of formulas that can be used to estimate the economic benefits of STI prevention (in 2006 US dollars), using data routinely collected by STI programs. For example, the averted sequelae costs associated with treating women for chlamydia is given as (C_w)(0.16)(0.925)(0.70)($1,995), where C_wis the number of infected women treated for chlamydia, 0.16 is the absolute reduction in the probability of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) as a result of treatment, 0.925 is an adjustment factor to prevent double-counting of PID averted in women with both chlamydia and gonorrhea, 0.70 is an adjustment factor to account for the possibility of re-infection, and $1,995 is the average cost per case of PID, based on published sources.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The formulas developed in this study can be a useful tool for STI program personnel to generate evidence-based estimates of the economic impact of their program and can facilitate the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of their activities.</p>