Assessment of Different Water Use Efficiency Calculations for Dominant Forage Crops in the Great Lakes Basin

Water use efficiency (WUE) can be calculated using a range of methods differing in carbon uptake and water use variable selection. Consequently, inconsistencies arise between WUE calculations due to complex physical and physiological interactions. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin De Haan, Myroslava Khomik, Adam Green, Warren Helgason, Merrin L. Macrae, Mazda Kompanizare, Richard M. Petrone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/8/739
id doaj-50f4f0d62e994dc4b91092262e57f9d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50f4f0d62e994dc4b91092262e57f9d42021-08-26T13:25:07ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722021-08-011173973910.3390/agriculture11080739Assessment of Different Water Use Efficiency Calculations for Dominant Forage Crops in the Great Lakes BasinKevin De Haan0Myroslava Khomik1Adam Green2Warren Helgason3Merrin L. Macrae4Mazda Kompanizare5Richard M. Petrone6Hydrometeorology Research Group, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, CanadaHydrometeorology Research Group, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, CanadaHydrometeorology Research Group, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, CanadaDepartment of Civil, Geological and Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, CanadaBiogeochemisty Lab, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, CanadaHydrometeorology Research Group, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, CanadaHydrometeorology Research Group, Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, CanadaWater use efficiency (WUE) can be calculated using a range of methods differing in carbon uptake and water use variable selection. Consequently, inconsistencies arise between WUE calculations due to complex physical and physiological interactions. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare WUE estimates (harvest or flux-based) for alfalfa (C<sub>3</sub> plant) and maize (C<sub>4</sub> plant) and determine effects of input variables, plant physiology and farming practices on estimates. Four WUE calculations were investigated: two “harvest-based” methods, using above ground carbon content and either precipitation or evapotranspiration (ET), and two “flux-based” methods, using gross primary productivity (GPP) and either ET or transpiration. WUE estimates differed based on method used at both half-hourly and seasonal scales. Input variables used in calculations affected WUE estimates, and plant physiology led to different responses in carbon assimilation and water use variables. WUE estimates were also impacted by different plant physiological responses and processing methods, even when the same carbon assimilation and water use variables were considered. This study highlights a need to develop a metric of measuring cropland carbon-water coupling that accounts for all water use components, plant carbon responses, and biomass production.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/8/739ecosystem water use efficiencyharvest water use efficiencyalfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i>)maize (<i>Zea mays</i>)fluxpart (flux variance similarity partitioning)eddy covariance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin De Haan
Myroslava Khomik
Adam Green
Warren Helgason
Merrin L. Macrae
Mazda Kompanizare
Richard M. Petrone
spellingShingle Kevin De Haan
Myroslava Khomik
Adam Green
Warren Helgason
Merrin L. Macrae
Mazda Kompanizare
Richard M. Petrone
Assessment of Different Water Use Efficiency Calculations for Dominant Forage Crops in the Great Lakes Basin
Agriculture
ecosystem water use efficiency
harvest water use efficiency
alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i>)
maize (<i>Zea mays</i>)
fluxpart (flux variance similarity partitioning)
eddy covariance
author_facet Kevin De Haan
Myroslava Khomik
Adam Green
Warren Helgason
Merrin L. Macrae
Mazda Kompanizare
Richard M. Petrone
author_sort Kevin De Haan
title Assessment of Different Water Use Efficiency Calculations for Dominant Forage Crops in the Great Lakes Basin
title_short Assessment of Different Water Use Efficiency Calculations for Dominant Forage Crops in the Great Lakes Basin
title_full Assessment of Different Water Use Efficiency Calculations for Dominant Forage Crops in the Great Lakes Basin
title_fullStr Assessment of Different Water Use Efficiency Calculations for Dominant Forage Crops in the Great Lakes Basin
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Different Water Use Efficiency Calculations for Dominant Forage Crops in the Great Lakes Basin
title_sort assessment of different water use efficiency calculations for dominant forage crops in the great lakes basin
publisher MDPI AG
series Agriculture
issn 2077-0472
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Water use efficiency (WUE) can be calculated using a range of methods differing in carbon uptake and water use variable selection. Consequently, inconsistencies arise between WUE calculations due to complex physical and physiological interactions. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare WUE estimates (harvest or flux-based) for alfalfa (C<sub>3</sub> plant) and maize (C<sub>4</sub> plant) and determine effects of input variables, plant physiology and farming practices on estimates. Four WUE calculations were investigated: two “harvest-based” methods, using above ground carbon content and either precipitation or evapotranspiration (ET), and two “flux-based” methods, using gross primary productivity (GPP) and either ET or transpiration. WUE estimates differed based on method used at both half-hourly and seasonal scales. Input variables used in calculations affected WUE estimates, and plant physiology led to different responses in carbon assimilation and water use variables. WUE estimates were also impacted by different plant physiological responses and processing methods, even when the same carbon assimilation and water use variables were considered. This study highlights a need to develop a metric of measuring cropland carbon-water coupling that accounts for all water use components, plant carbon responses, and biomass production.
topic ecosystem water use efficiency
harvest water use efficiency
alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i>)
maize (<i>Zea mays</i>)
fluxpart (flux variance similarity partitioning)
eddy covariance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/8/739
work_keys_str_mv AT kevindehaan assessmentofdifferentwateruseefficiencycalculationsfordominantforagecropsinthegreatlakesbasin
AT myroslavakhomik assessmentofdifferentwateruseefficiencycalculationsfordominantforagecropsinthegreatlakesbasin
AT adamgreen assessmentofdifferentwateruseefficiencycalculationsfordominantforagecropsinthegreatlakesbasin
AT warrenhelgason assessmentofdifferentwateruseefficiencycalculationsfordominantforagecropsinthegreatlakesbasin
AT merrinlmacrae assessmentofdifferentwateruseefficiencycalculationsfordominantforagecropsinthegreatlakesbasin
AT mazdakompanizare assessmentofdifferentwateruseefficiencycalculationsfordominantforagecropsinthegreatlakesbasin
AT richardmpetrone assessmentofdifferentwateruseefficiencycalculationsfordominantforagecropsinthegreatlakesbasin
_version_ 1721195466632200192