No Evidence for a Food-Related Attention Bias after Thought Suppression
<span>The aim of this study was to investigate whether food-related thought suppression results in an attention bias for food cues. Fifty-nine female students took part in the experiment. All completed a modified exogenous cueing task containing pictures of foods and toys with a similar valenc...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2008-01-01
|
Series: | Psychologica Belgica |
Online Access: | http://www.psychologicabelgica.com/articles/113 |
id |
doaj-50c7fa60ac9a41369cc7e0412d221737 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-50c7fa60ac9a41369cc7e0412d2217372020-11-24T22:52:40ZengUbiquity PressPsychologica Belgica0033-28792054-670X2008-01-01481376110.5334/pb-48-1-37113No Evidence for a Food-Related Attention Bias after Thought SuppressionBarbara Soetens0Caroline Braet1Guy Bosmans2Department of Applied Psychology, Catholic University of LeuvenDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University<span>The aim of this study was to investigate whether food-related thought suppression results in an attention bias for food cues. Fifty-nine female students took part in the experiment. All completed a modified exogenous cueing task containing pictures of foods and toys with a similar valence (presentation duration: 250 ms and 1050 ms). Half of the participants were instructed to suppress thoughts about food and the other half was given control instructions, prior to completing the exogenous cueing task. No evidence was found for an enhanced cue validity effect for food cues after food-related thought suppression. Hence, the preliminary results do not provide support for the hypothesis that thought suppression is sufficient to yield an attention bias. Since the study was the first to employ an exogenous cueing task to study the attentional processing of food cues, replication is warranted.</span>http://www.psychologicabelgica.com/articles/113 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Barbara Soetens Caroline Braet Guy Bosmans |
spellingShingle |
Barbara Soetens Caroline Braet Guy Bosmans No Evidence for a Food-Related Attention Bias after Thought Suppression Psychologica Belgica |
author_facet |
Barbara Soetens Caroline Braet Guy Bosmans |
author_sort |
Barbara Soetens |
title |
No Evidence for a Food-Related Attention Bias after Thought Suppression |
title_short |
No Evidence for a Food-Related Attention Bias after Thought Suppression |
title_full |
No Evidence for a Food-Related Attention Bias after Thought Suppression |
title_fullStr |
No Evidence for a Food-Related Attention Bias after Thought Suppression |
title_full_unstemmed |
No Evidence for a Food-Related Attention Bias after Thought Suppression |
title_sort |
no evidence for a food-related attention bias after thought suppression |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Psychologica Belgica |
issn |
0033-2879 2054-670X |
publishDate |
2008-01-01 |
description |
<span>The aim of this study was to investigate whether food-related thought suppression results in an attention bias for food cues. Fifty-nine female students took part in the experiment. All completed a modified exogenous cueing task containing pictures of foods and toys with a similar valence (presentation duration: 250 ms and 1050 ms). Half of the participants were instructed to suppress thoughts about food and the other half was given control instructions, prior to completing the exogenous cueing task. No evidence was found for an enhanced cue validity effect for food cues after food-related thought suppression. Hence, the preliminary results do not provide support for the hypothesis that thought suppression is sufficient to yield an attention bias. Since the study was the first to employ an exogenous cueing task to study the attentional processing of food cues, replication is warranted.</span> |
url |
http://www.psychologicabelgica.com/articles/113 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT barbarasoetens noevidenceforafoodrelatedattentionbiasafterthoughtsuppression AT carolinebraet noevidenceforafoodrelatedattentionbiasafterthoughtsuppression AT guybosmans noevidenceforafoodrelatedattentionbiasafterthoughtsuppression |
_version_ |
1725665072869539840 |