Response to rebuttal by Grima et al. elaborating on misleading conclusion in paper on “Pollution Monitoring for Sea Salt Aerosols at Hagar Qim-A Pilot Study” concerning salt decay after sheltering an archaeological site in Malta
Main Authors: | JoAnn Cassar, Shirley Cefai, Reuben Grima, Katya Stroud |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Heritage Science |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40494-018-0237-7 |
Similar Items
-
Sheltering archaeological sites in Malta: lessons learnt
by: JoAnn Cassar, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
A rebuttal in defence of misinterpretation of the Galea et al. 2016 paper entitled “Pollution monitoring for sea salt aerosols and other anionic species at Hagar Qim Temples, Malta: a pilot study”
by: Matthew Grima, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Controlling crystallization damage by the use of salt inhibitors on Malta’s limestone
by: J. Cassar, et al.
Published: (2008-06-01) -
Hagar
by: Adam Grzybowski, et al.
Published: (2012-03-01) -
Monuments and landscapes in Late Neolithic Malta
by: Reuben Grima
Published: (2012-11-01)