Clinical comparisons of 0.5% and 0.375% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with nerve stimulation

BackgroundIn an axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB), where relatively large doses of local anesthetics are administered, levobupivacaine is preferred due to a greater margin of safety. However, the efficacy of levobupivacaine in ABPB has not been studied much. We performed a prospective, double-bl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wonkyo Kim, Youn Jin Kim, Jong-Hak Kim, Dong Yeon Kim, Rack Kyung Chung, Chi Hyo Kim, Seok Heo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2012-01-01
Series:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-62-24.pdf
id doaj-50c0db117b714980bf6d379e94a8101b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50c0db117b714980bf6d379e94a8101b2020-11-25T02:20:22ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsKorean Journal of Anesthesiology2005-64192005-75632012-01-01621242910.4097/kjae.2012.62.1.247293Clinical comparisons of 0.5% and 0.375% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with nerve stimulationWonkyo Kim0Youn Jin Kim1Jong-Hak Kim2Dong Yeon Kim3Rack Kyung Chung4Chi Hyo Kim5Seok Heo6Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.BackgroundIn an axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB), where relatively large doses of local anesthetics are administered, levobupivacaine is preferred due to a greater margin of safety. However, the efficacy of levobupivacaine in ABPB has not been studied much. We performed a prospective, double-blinded study to compare the clinical effect of 0.375% levobupivacaine with 0.5% levobupivacaine for ultrasound (US)-guided ABPB with nerve stimulation.MethodsForty patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery were randomized into two groups: Group I (0.375% levobupivacaine) and Group II (0.5% levobupivacaine). All four main terminal nerves of the brachial plexus were blocked separately with 7 ml of levobupivacaine using US guidance with nerve stimulation according to study group. A blinded observer recorded the onset time for sensory and motor block, elapsed time to be ready for surgery, recovery time for sensory and motor block, quality of anesthesia, patient satisfaction and complications.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the time to find nerve locations, time to perform block and number of skin punctures between groups. Insufficient block was reported in one patient of Group I, but no failed block was reported in either group. There were no differences in the onset time for sensory and motor block, elapsed time to be ready for surgery, patient satisfaction and complications.Conclusions0.375% levobupivacaine produced adequate anesthesia for ABPB using US guidance with nerve stimulation, without any clinically significant differences compared to 0.5% levobupivacaine.http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-62-24.pdfaxillary brachial plexus blocklevobupivacaineultrasonography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wonkyo Kim
Youn Jin Kim
Jong-Hak Kim
Dong Yeon Kim
Rack Kyung Chung
Chi Hyo Kim
Seok Heo
spellingShingle Wonkyo Kim
Youn Jin Kim
Jong-Hak Kim
Dong Yeon Kim
Rack Kyung Chung
Chi Hyo Kim
Seok Heo
Clinical comparisons of 0.5% and 0.375% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with nerve stimulation
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
axillary brachial plexus block
levobupivacaine
ultrasonography
author_facet Wonkyo Kim
Youn Jin Kim
Jong-Hak Kim
Dong Yeon Kim
Rack Kyung Chung
Chi Hyo Kim
Seok Heo
author_sort Wonkyo Kim
title Clinical comparisons of 0.5% and 0.375% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with nerve stimulation
title_short Clinical comparisons of 0.5% and 0.375% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with nerve stimulation
title_full Clinical comparisons of 0.5% and 0.375% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with nerve stimulation
title_fullStr Clinical comparisons of 0.5% and 0.375% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with nerve stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Clinical comparisons of 0.5% and 0.375% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with nerve stimulation
title_sort clinical comparisons of 0.5% and 0.375% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with nerve stimulation
publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
series Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
issn 2005-6419
2005-7563
publishDate 2012-01-01
description BackgroundIn an axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB), where relatively large doses of local anesthetics are administered, levobupivacaine is preferred due to a greater margin of safety. However, the efficacy of levobupivacaine in ABPB has not been studied much. We performed a prospective, double-blinded study to compare the clinical effect of 0.375% levobupivacaine with 0.5% levobupivacaine for ultrasound (US)-guided ABPB with nerve stimulation.MethodsForty patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery were randomized into two groups: Group I (0.375% levobupivacaine) and Group II (0.5% levobupivacaine). All four main terminal nerves of the brachial plexus were blocked separately with 7 ml of levobupivacaine using US guidance with nerve stimulation according to study group. A blinded observer recorded the onset time for sensory and motor block, elapsed time to be ready for surgery, recovery time for sensory and motor block, quality of anesthesia, patient satisfaction and complications.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the time to find nerve locations, time to perform block and number of skin punctures between groups. Insufficient block was reported in one patient of Group I, but no failed block was reported in either group. There were no differences in the onset time for sensory and motor block, elapsed time to be ready for surgery, patient satisfaction and complications.Conclusions0.375% levobupivacaine produced adequate anesthesia for ABPB using US guidance with nerve stimulation, without any clinically significant differences compared to 0.5% levobupivacaine.
topic axillary brachial plexus block
levobupivacaine
ultrasonography
url http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-62-24.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT wonkyokim clinicalcomparisonsof05and0375levobupivacaineforultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockwithnervestimulation
AT younjinkim clinicalcomparisonsof05and0375levobupivacaineforultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockwithnervestimulation
AT jonghakkim clinicalcomparisonsof05and0375levobupivacaineforultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockwithnervestimulation
AT dongyeonkim clinicalcomparisonsof05and0375levobupivacaineforultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockwithnervestimulation
AT rackkyungchung clinicalcomparisonsof05and0375levobupivacaineforultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockwithnervestimulation
AT chihyokim clinicalcomparisonsof05and0375levobupivacaineforultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockwithnervestimulation
AT seokheo clinicalcomparisonsof05and0375levobupivacaineforultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblockwithnervestimulation
_version_ 1724871851683872768