Accelerated dobutamine stress testing: Feasibility and safety in patients with moderate aortic stenosis

Objective: A continuous infusion of a single high dose of dobutamine was suggested as a simple protocol of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). The present study explores the feasibility and safety of an accelerated DSE protocol in patients with calcific moderate valvular aortic stenosis underg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohamed Shehata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2015-06-01
Series:The Egyptian Heart Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260814000416
id doaj-50b4b069e64046e4b94f53923efcb151
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50b4b069e64046e4b94f53923efcb1512020-11-25T01:21:14ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Heart Journal1110-26082015-06-0167210711310.1016/j.ehj.2014.04.002Accelerated dobutamine stress testing: Feasibility and safety in patients with moderate aortic stenosisMohamed ShehataObjective: A continuous infusion of a single high dose of dobutamine was suggested as a simple protocol of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). The present study explores the feasibility and safety of an accelerated DSE protocol in patients with calcific moderate valvular aortic stenosis undergoing DSE for evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease. Methods: Eligible patients (n = 100) were prospectively enrolled. They were randomly assigned to undergo either the accelerated (group A, 50 patients) or the conventional protocol (group B, 50 patients). Group A received a continuous infusion of 40 μg/kg/min ± 1–2 mg atropine. Patients were monitored for adverse drug effects. Test duration was recorded. Patients with positive stress results underwent coronary angiography (CA). Results: Mean age of the study cohort was 62.29 ± 9.8 years, 62 (62%) being males. Mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve was recorded (group A: 32.2 mmHg and group B: 31.16 mmHg, P < 0.05). Group B showed a longer mean test duration (17.9 ± 2.3 vs. 8.9 ± 1.9 min, P < 0.001) and higher mean weight-adjusted cumulative dobutamine dose (385 ± 115 vs. 350 ± 110.24 μg/kg, P < 0.05). The two groups received a similar total dose of atropine. Group A patients showed significantly lower incidence of extra-systoles, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and severe hypotension (P < 0.05). CA results yielded almost similar diagnostic outcomes in both groups. Conclusion: In patients with calcific moderate aortic stenosis undergoing DSE; adopting the described accelerated protocol is associated with shorter test duration, lower weight-adjusted cumulative dobutamine dose for target heart rate achievement and fewer adverse effects, while maintaining a comparable diagnostic value.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260814000416Dobutamine stress echocardiographyModerate aortic stenosisAccelerated protocolSafety
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohamed Shehata
spellingShingle Mohamed Shehata
Accelerated dobutamine stress testing: Feasibility and safety in patients with moderate aortic stenosis
The Egyptian Heart Journal
Dobutamine stress echocardiography
Moderate aortic stenosis
Accelerated protocol
Safety
author_facet Mohamed Shehata
author_sort Mohamed Shehata
title Accelerated dobutamine stress testing: Feasibility and safety in patients with moderate aortic stenosis
title_short Accelerated dobutamine stress testing: Feasibility and safety in patients with moderate aortic stenosis
title_full Accelerated dobutamine stress testing: Feasibility and safety in patients with moderate aortic stenosis
title_fullStr Accelerated dobutamine stress testing: Feasibility and safety in patients with moderate aortic stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Accelerated dobutamine stress testing: Feasibility and safety in patients with moderate aortic stenosis
title_sort accelerated dobutamine stress testing: feasibility and safety in patients with moderate aortic stenosis
publisher SpringerOpen
series The Egyptian Heart Journal
issn 1110-2608
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Objective: A continuous infusion of a single high dose of dobutamine was suggested as a simple protocol of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). The present study explores the feasibility and safety of an accelerated DSE protocol in patients with calcific moderate valvular aortic stenosis undergoing DSE for evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease. Methods: Eligible patients (n = 100) were prospectively enrolled. They were randomly assigned to undergo either the accelerated (group A, 50 patients) or the conventional protocol (group B, 50 patients). Group A received a continuous infusion of 40 μg/kg/min ± 1–2 mg atropine. Patients were monitored for adverse drug effects. Test duration was recorded. Patients with positive stress results underwent coronary angiography (CA). Results: Mean age of the study cohort was 62.29 ± 9.8 years, 62 (62%) being males. Mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve was recorded (group A: 32.2 mmHg and group B: 31.16 mmHg, P < 0.05). Group B showed a longer mean test duration (17.9 ± 2.3 vs. 8.9 ± 1.9 min, P < 0.001) and higher mean weight-adjusted cumulative dobutamine dose (385 ± 115 vs. 350 ± 110.24 μg/kg, P < 0.05). The two groups received a similar total dose of atropine. Group A patients showed significantly lower incidence of extra-systoles, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and severe hypotension (P < 0.05). CA results yielded almost similar diagnostic outcomes in both groups. Conclusion: In patients with calcific moderate aortic stenosis undergoing DSE; adopting the described accelerated protocol is associated with shorter test duration, lower weight-adjusted cumulative dobutamine dose for target heart rate achievement and fewer adverse effects, while maintaining a comparable diagnostic value.
topic Dobutamine stress echocardiography
Moderate aortic stenosis
Accelerated protocol
Safety
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260814000416
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedshehata accelerateddobutaminestresstestingfeasibilityandsafetyinpatientswithmoderateaorticstenosis
_version_ 1725131508847476736