Mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in Darfur (2004–2012): a systematic review

Abstract Background Armed conflict in Darfur, west Sudan since 2003 has led to the influx of about 100 international humanitarian UN and non-governmental organizations to help the affected population. Many of their humanitarian interventions included the collection of human personal data and/or bios...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ghaiath Hussein, Khalifa Elmusharaf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-019-0377-7
id doaj-50b42b0b0039480c98b3d45bc63ef389
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50b42b0b0039480c98b3d45bc63ef3892020-11-25T01:19:28ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392019-06-0120111410.1186/s12910-019-0377-7Mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in Darfur (2004–2012): a systematic reviewGhaiath Hussein0Khalifa Elmusharaf1Doctoral Researcher, Medicine, Ethics, Science and Humanities (MESH), University of Birmingham, School of Public healthSenior Lecturer in Public Health, Graduate Entry Medical School, University of LimerickAbstract Background Armed conflict in Darfur, west Sudan since 2003 has led to the influx of about 100 international humanitarian UN and non-governmental organizations to help the affected population. Many of their humanitarian interventions included the collection of human personal data and/or biosamples, and these activities are often associated with ethical issues. A systematic review was conducted to assess the proportion of publicly available online reports of the research activities undertaken on humans in Darfur between 2004 and 2012 that mention obtaining ethical approval and/or informed consent. Methods This systematic review is based on a systematic literature search of Complex Emergency Database, ReliefWeb, PubMed), followed by a hand search for the hardcopies of the eligible reports archived in the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) in Brussels. Results The online search showed that out of the 68 eligible studies, 13.2% (9) reported gaining ethical approval and 42.6% (29) that an informed consent was obtained from the participants. The CRED search included 138 eligible reports. None of these reports mentioned gaining ethical approval and 17 (12.3%) mentioned obtaining informed consent from their participants. Conclusions The proportion of studies reporting ethical review and informed consent was smaller than might be expected, so we suggest five possible explanations for these findings. This review provides empirical evidence that can help in planning ethical conduct of research in humanitarian settings.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-019-0377-7Research ethicsHumanitarian ethicsNon-governmental organizationsPublic health ethicsDeveloping countries
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ghaiath Hussein
Khalifa Elmusharaf
spellingShingle Ghaiath Hussein
Khalifa Elmusharaf
Mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in Darfur (2004–2012): a systematic review
BMC Medical Ethics
Research ethics
Humanitarian ethics
Non-governmental organizations
Public health ethics
Developing countries
author_facet Ghaiath Hussein
Khalifa Elmusharaf
author_sort Ghaiath Hussein
title Mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in Darfur (2004–2012): a systematic review
title_short Mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in Darfur (2004–2012): a systematic review
title_full Mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in Darfur (2004–2012): a systematic review
title_fullStr Mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in Darfur (2004–2012): a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in Darfur (2004–2012): a systematic review
title_sort mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in darfur (2004–2012): a systematic review
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Ethics
issn 1472-6939
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background Armed conflict in Darfur, west Sudan since 2003 has led to the influx of about 100 international humanitarian UN and non-governmental organizations to help the affected population. Many of their humanitarian interventions included the collection of human personal data and/or biosamples, and these activities are often associated with ethical issues. A systematic review was conducted to assess the proportion of publicly available online reports of the research activities undertaken on humans in Darfur between 2004 and 2012 that mention obtaining ethical approval and/or informed consent. Methods This systematic review is based on a systematic literature search of Complex Emergency Database, ReliefWeb, PubMed), followed by a hand search for the hardcopies of the eligible reports archived in the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) in Brussels. Results The online search showed that out of the 68 eligible studies, 13.2% (9) reported gaining ethical approval and 42.6% (29) that an informed consent was obtained from the participants. The CRED search included 138 eligible reports. None of these reports mentioned gaining ethical approval and 17 (12.3%) mentioned obtaining informed consent from their participants. Conclusions The proportion of studies reporting ethical review and informed consent was smaller than might be expected, so we suggest five possible explanations for these findings. This review provides empirical evidence that can help in planning ethical conduct of research in humanitarian settings.
topic Research ethics
Humanitarian ethics
Non-governmental organizations
Public health ethics
Developing countries
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-019-0377-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ghaiathhussein mentionofethicalreviewandinformedconsentinthereportsofresearchundertakenduringthearmedconflictindarfur20042012asystematicreview
AT khalifaelmusharaf mentionofethicalreviewandinformedconsentinthereportsofresearchundertakenduringthearmedconflictindarfur20042012asystematicreview
_version_ 1725138122734305280