Can non-small cell lung cancer histologic subtypes predict survival? A single institution experience

• Main Authors: Cornelia Nitipir, Cristina Orlov, Ana-Maria Popa, Mihaela Olaru, Iulian Slavu, Iaciu Cristian, Razvan Hainarosie, Anca Pantea Stoian, Cristian Balalau
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ion Motofei, Carol Davila University 2018-10-01
• Series: Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences
• Subjects: adenocarcinoma; non-small cell lung cancer; histologic subtypes; survival
• Online Access: https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1137&context=jmms

Introduction. The latest histological classification of lung adenocarcinoma includes lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, and solid as subtypes. Testing these subtypes for their prognostic and predictive value is an ongoing scientific challenge. The present research article aims to describe the influence this classification has on patient survival. Materials and Methods. Thirty-three patients were included in the trial. The most important enrollment criterion was the clear specification of the adenocarcinoma subtype in the pathology report. Patients were stratified into three groups which included the adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes as follows: lepidic (LEP), acinar and papillary (ACN/PAP), and micropapillary/solid (MIP/SOL). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Other endpoints included overall survival. Results. The lepidic subtype of ADC had superior PFS and OS, regardless of stage. Papillary and acinar subtype showed an intermediate prognosis, whereas micropapillary and solid subtypes were the most aggressive. Conclusions. The experience of this single center confirmed data in the literature. Further studies are needed to demonstrate all the possible implications of this pathology classification.