Sensitivity analysis of a wetland methane emission model based on temperate and arctic wetland sites

• Main Authors: J. van Huissteden, A. M. R. Petrescu, D. M. D. Hendriks, K. T. Rebel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2009-12-01
• Series: Biogeosciences
• Online Access: http://www.biogeosciences.net/6/3035/2009/bg-6-3035-2009.pdf
• ISSN: 1726-4170; 1726-4189

Modelling of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes using wetland soil emission models is used to determine the size of this natural source of CH<sub>4</sub> emission on local to global scale. Most process models of CH<sub>4</sub> formation and soil-atmosphere CH<sub>4</sub> transport processes operate on a plot scale. For large scale emission modelling (regional to global scale) upscaling of this type of model requires thorough analysis of the sensitivity of these models to parameter uncertainty. We applied the GLUE (Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Analysis) methodology to a well-known CH<sub>4</sub> emission model, the Walter-Heimann model, as implemented in the PEATLAND-VU model. The model is tested using data from two temperate wetland sites and one arctic site. The tests include experiments with different objective functions, which quantify the fit of the model results to the data. <br><br> The results indicate that the model 1) in most cases is capable of estimating CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes better than an estimate based on the data avarage, but does not clearly outcompete a regression model based on local data; 2) is capable of reproducing larger scale (seasonal) temporal variability in the data, but not the small-scale (daily) temporal variability; 3) is not strongly sensitive to soil parameters, 4) is sensitive to parameters determining CH<sub>4</sub> transport and oxidation in vegetation, and the temperature sensitivity of the microbial population. The GLUE method also allowed testing of several smaller modifications of the original model. <br><br> We conclude that upscaling of this plot-based wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emission model is feasible, but considerable improvements of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> modelling will result from improvement of wetland vegetation data.