A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison

This study has set out to identify, quantify, typify, and exemplify the discourse functions of canonical antonymy in Arabic paremiography by comparing two manually collected datasets from Egyptian and Saudi (Najdi) dialects. Building upon Jones’s (2002) most extensive and often-cited classification...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hassanein Hamada, Mahzari Mohammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2021-06-01
Series:Open Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0013
id doaj-504f70cc708c46349d8252becfaeae50
record_format Article
spelling doaj-504f70cc708c46349d8252becfaeae502021-10-03T07:42:41ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692021-06-017120022210.1515/opli-2021-0013A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparisonHassanein Hamada0Mahzari Mohammad1Department of English, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. 83, 11942 Alkharj, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of English, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. 83, 11942 Alkharj, Saudi ArabiaThis study has set out to identify, quantify, typify, and exemplify the discourse functions of canonical antonymy in Arabic paremiography by comparing two manually collected datasets from Egyptian and Saudi (Najdi) dialects. Building upon Jones’s (2002) most extensive and often-cited classification of the discourse functions of antonyms as they co-occur within syntactic frames in news discourse, the study has substantially revised this classification and developed a provisional and dynamic typology thereof. Two major textual functions are found to be quantitatively significant and qualitatively preponderant: ancillarity (wherein an A-pair of canonical antonyms project their antonymicity onto a more important B-pair) and coordination (wherein one antonym holds an inclusive or exhaustive relation to another antonym). Three new functions have been developed and added to the retrieved classification: subordination (wherein one antonym occurs in a subordinate clause while the other occurs in a main clause), case-marking (wherein two opposite cases are served by two antonyms), and replacement (wherein one antonym is substituted with another). Semicanonical and noncanonical guises of antonymy are left and recommended for future research.https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0013canonical antonymsfunctionsframesegyptian arabicsaudi arabicparemiographytypology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hassanein Hamada
Mahzari Mohammad
spellingShingle Hassanein Hamada
Mahzari Mohammad
A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison
Open Linguistics
canonical antonyms
functions
frames
egyptian arabic
saudi arabic
paremiography
typology
author_facet Hassanein Hamada
Mahzari Mohammad
author_sort Hassanein Hamada
title A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison
title_short A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison
title_full A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison
title_fullStr A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison
title_full_unstemmed A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison
title_sort taxonomy of antonymy in arabic: egyptian and saudi proverbs in comparison
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Linguistics
issn 2300-9969
publishDate 2021-06-01
description This study has set out to identify, quantify, typify, and exemplify the discourse functions of canonical antonymy in Arabic paremiography by comparing two manually collected datasets from Egyptian and Saudi (Najdi) dialects. Building upon Jones’s (2002) most extensive and often-cited classification of the discourse functions of antonyms as they co-occur within syntactic frames in news discourse, the study has substantially revised this classification and developed a provisional and dynamic typology thereof. Two major textual functions are found to be quantitatively significant and qualitatively preponderant: ancillarity (wherein an A-pair of canonical antonyms project their antonymicity onto a more important B-pair) and coordination (wherein one antonym holds an inclusive or exhaustive relation to another antonym). Three new functions have been developed and added to the retrieved classification: subordination (wherein one antonym occurs in a subordinate clause while the other occurs in a main clause), case-marking (wherein two opposite cases are served by two antonyms), and replacement (wherein one antonym is substituted with another). Semicanonical and noncanonical guises of antonymy are left and recommended for future research.
topic canonical antonyms
functions
frames
egyptian arabic
saudi arabic
paremiography
typology
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0013
work_keys_str_mv AT hassaneinhamada ataxonomyofantonymyinarabicegyptianandsaudiproverbsincomparison
AT mahzarimohammad ataxonomyofantonymyinarabicegyptianandsaudiproverbsincomparison
AT hassaneinhamada taxonomyofantonymyinarabicegyptianandsaudiproverbsincomparison
AT mahzarimohammad taxonomyofantonymyinarabicegyptianandsaudiproverbsincomparison
_version_ 1716845880058839040