A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison
This study has set out to identify, quantify, typify, and exemplify the discourse functions of canonical antonymy in Arabic paremiography by comparing two manually collected datasets from Egyptian and Saudi (Najdi) dialects. Building upon Jones’s (2002) most extensive and often-cited classification...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Open Linguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0013 |
id |
doaj-504f70cc708c46349d8252becfaeae50 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-504f70cc708c46349d8252becfaeae502021-10-03T07:42:41ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692021-06-017120022210.1515/opli-2021-0013A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparisonHassanein Hamada0Mahzari Mohammad1Department of English, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. 83, 11942 Alkharj, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of English, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. 83, 11942 Alkharj, Saudi ArabiaThis study has set out to identify, quantify, typify, and exemplify the discourse functions of canonical antonymy in Arabic paremiography by comparing two manually collected datasets from Egyptian and Saudi (Najdi) dialects. Building upon Jones’s (2002) most extensive and often-cited classification of the discourse functions of antonyms as they co-occur within syntactic frames in news discourse, the study has substantially revised this classification and developed a provisional and dynamic typology thereof. Two major textual functions are found to be quantitatively significant and qualitatively preponderant: ancillarity (wherein an A-pair of canonical antonyms project their antonymicity onto a more important B-pair) and coordination (wherein one antonym holds an inclusive or exhaustive relation to another antonym). Three new functions have been developed and added to the retrieved classification: subordination (wherein one antonym occurs in a subordinate clause while the other occurs in a main clause), case-marking (wherein two opposite cases are served by two antonyms), and replacement (wherein one antonym is substituted with another). Semicanonical and noncanonical guises of antonymy are left and recommended for future research.https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0013canonical antonymsfunctionsframesegyptian arabicsaudi arabicparemiographytypology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hassanein Hamada Mahzari Mohammad |
spellingShingle |
Hassanein Hamada Mahzari Mohammad A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison Open Linguistics canonical antonyms functions frames egyptian arabic saudi arabic paremiography typology |
author_facet |
Hassanein Hamada Mahzari Mohammad |
author_sort |
Hassanein Hamada |
title |
A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison |
title_short |
A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison |
title_full |
A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison |
title_fullStr |
A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison |
title_full_unstemmed |
A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison |
title_sort |
taxonomy of antonymy in arabic: egyptian and saudi proverbs in comparison |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Linguistics |
issn |
2300-9969 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
This study has set out to identify, quantify, typify, and exemplify the discourse functions of canonical antonymy in Arabic paremiography by comparing two manually collected datasets from Egyptian and Saudi (Najdi) dialects. Building upon Jones’s (2002) most extensive and often-cited classification of the discourse functions of antonyms as they co-occur within syntactic frames in news discourse, the study has substantially revised this classification and developed a provisional and dynamic typology thereof. Two major textual functions are found to be quantitatively significant and qualitatively preponderant: ancillarity (wherein an A-pair of canonical antonyms project their antonymicity onto a more important B-pair) and coordination (wherein one antonym holds an inclusive or exhaustive relation to another antonym). Three new functions have been developed and added to the retrieved classification: subordination (wherein one antonym occurs in a subordinate clause while the other occurs in a main clause), case-marking (wherein two opposite cases are served by two antonyms), and replacement (wherein one antonym is substituted with another). Semicanonical and noncanonical guises of antonymy are left and recommended for future research. |
topic |
canonical antonyms functions frames egyptian arabic saudi arabic paremiography typology |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0013 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hassaneinhamada ataxonomyofantonymyinarabicegyptianandsaudiproverbsincomparison AT mahzarimohammad ataxonomyofantonymyinarabicegyptianandsaudiproverbsincomparison AT hassaneinhamada taxonomyofantonymyinarabicegyptianandsaudiproverbsincomparison AT mahzarimohammad taxonomyofantonymyinarabicegyptianandsaudiproverbsincomparison |
_version_ |
1716845880058839040 |