On the nature of thinking without representation

This article focuses on Deleuze’s attempt to describe so-called thinking of differences, which severs any connection with the premises of natural pre-philosophical thinking and good will tending towards good and truth. The author believes that Deleuze’s thinking of differences does have a rather evi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Poma A.
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University 2015-04-01
Series:Кантовский сборник
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/c94/Andrey%20Poma,%20%2028-42.pdf
id doaj-5036dca6cfdd4f37833cc806aa2d9fa4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5036dca6cfdd4f37833cc806aa2d9fa42020-11-25T00:42:35ZdeuImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityКантовский сборник0207-69182310-37012015-04-01341284210.5922/0207-6918-2015-1-3On the nature of thinking without representationPoma A. This article focuses on Deleuze’s attempt to describe so-called thinking of differences, which severs any connection with the premises of natural pre-philosophical thinking and good will tending towards good and truth. The author believes that Deleuze’s thinking of differences does have a rather evident premise. For Deleuze, thinking is an energy flow or sensual “vitality”.Another approach to analysing the fundamentals of thinking can be found in Kant’s article “What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?” where he speaks of the “need of reason”. Since the “need of reason” is necessary for the practical interest of reason itself, it directs, according to Kant, not only practical reason, but also general systematic and critical thinking. It is “common sense”, as the location of this “need of reason”, that can and must be accepted as a valid and ra-tional premise for thinking.As a follower of the tradition of Kant’s transcendental philosophy, the founder of Marburg School of Neo-Kantianism, develops and deepens insight into the issue in question thus obtaining original and interesting results. https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/c94/Andrey%20Poma,%20%2028-42.pdfthinkinginitial beginningneed of reasonDeleuzeKantCohenrationalitydifferencetheoretical and practical reason
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Poma A.
spellingShingle Poma A.
On the nature of thinking without representation
Кантовский сборник
thinking
initial beginning
need of reason
Deleuze
Kant
Cohen
rationality
difference
theoretical and practical reason
author_facet Poma A.
author_sort Poma A.
title On the nature of thinking without representation
title_short On the nature of thinking without representation
title_full On the nature of thinking without representation
title_fullStr On the nature of thinking without representation
title_full_unstemmed On the nature of thinking without representation
title_sort on the nature of thinking without representation
publisher Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
series Кантовский сборник
issn 0207-6918
2310-3701
publishDate 2015-04-01
description This article focuses on Deleuze’s attempt to describe so-called thinking of differences, which severs any connection with the premises of natural pre-philosophical thinking and good will tending towards good and truth. The author believes that Deleuze’s thinking of differences does have a rather evident premise. For Deleuze, thinking is an energy flow or sensual “vitality”.Another approach to analysing the fundamentals of thinking can be found in Kant’s article “What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?” where he speaks of the “need of reason”. Since the “need of reason” is necessary for the practical interest of reason itself, it directs, according to Kant, not only practical reason, but also general systematic and critical thinking. It is “common sense”, as the location of this “need of reason”, that can and must be accepted as a valid and ra-tional premise for thinking.As a follower of the tradition of Kant’s transcendental philosophy, the founder of Marburg School of Neo-Kantianism, develops and deepens insight into the issue in question thus obtaining original and interesting results.
topic thinking
initial beginning
need of reason
Deleuze
Kant
Cohen
rationality
difference
theoretical and practical reason
url https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/c94/Andrey%20Poma,%20%2028-42.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pomaa onthenatureofthinkingwithoutrepresentation
_version_ 1725281475762323456