Tid for terror. Læreres håndtering av kontroversielle spørsmål i skolens religions- og livssynsundervisning

Religious Education in Norway has been criticised for avoiding conflict perspectives and controversial issues. This article looks closer at some of these issues by focusing on how teachers in upper secondary school have dealt with the terrorist attacks in Norway on 22 July 2011 in the subject matte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trine Anker, Marie von der Lippe
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter (IKO) 2017-02-01
Series:Prismet
Online Access:https://journals.uio.no/prismet/article/view/4478
id doaj-5036b2bbcc5c40cab3f719f6eae9736e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5036b2bbcc5c40cab3f719f6eae9736e2020-11-25T03:44:58ZdanKirkelig Pedagogisk Senter (IKO)Prismet0032-88472535-311X2017-02-01410.5617/pri.4478Tid for terror. Læreres håndtering av kontroversielle spørsmål i skolens religions- og livssynsundervisningTrine Anker0Marie von der Lippe1Førsteamanuensis i religionsvitenskap ved MFFørsteamanuensis i religionsvitenskap, Universitet i Bergen Religious Education in Norway has been criticised for avoiding conflict perspectives and controversial issues. This article looks closer at some of these issues by focusing on how teachers in upper secondary school have dealt with the terrorist attacks in Norway on 22 July 2011 in the subject matter Religion and Ethics. This study takes as a starting point a previous study among students in upper secondary schools and their perceptions of what school has done in the aftermath of the incident, by adding teachers’ perspectives (Anker & von der Lippe 2015). The findings from the student survey showed that 22 July has almost been silenced in school, and the interviews with the teachers partly confirm this. The picture is however broadened, and shows that teachers have dealt with the issues in different ways. An important finding is that teachers´ personal and academic competencies seem to be important for whether and how controversial subjects are included in their teachings or not. Keywords: 22. July, controversial issues, democratic citizenship, religious extremism, religious education Nøkkelord: 22. juli, kontroversielle problemer, demokratisk statsborgerskap, religiøs ekstremisme, religionsundervisning https://journals.uio.no/prismet/article/view/4478
collection DOAJ
language Danish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Trine Anker
Marie von der Lippe
spellingShingle Trine Anker
Marie von der Lippe
Tid for terror. Læreres håndtering av kontroversielle spørsmål i skolens religions- og livssynsundervisning
Prismet
author_facet Trine Anker
Marie von der Lippe
author_sort Trine Anker
title Tid for terror. Læreres håndtering av kontroversielle spørsmål i skolens religions- og livssynsundervisning
title_short Tid for terror. Læreres håndtering av kontroversielle spørsmål i skolens religions- og livssynsundervisning
title_full Tid for terror. Læreres håndtering av kontroversielle spørsmål i skolens religions- og livssynsundervisning
title_fullStr Tid for terror. Læreres håndtering av kontroversielle spørsmål i skolens religions- og livssynsundervisning
title_full_unstemmed Tid for terror. Læreres håndtering av kontroversielle spørsmål i skolens religions- og livssynsundervisning
title_sort tid for terror. læreres håndtering av kontroversielle spørsmål i skolens religions- og livssynsundervisning
publisher Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter (IKO)
series Prismet
issn 0032-8847
2535-311X
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Religious Education in Norway has been criticised for avoiding conflict perspectives and controversial issues. This article looks closer at some of these issues by focusing on how teachers in upper secondary school have dealt with the terrorist attacks in Norway on 22 July 2011 in the subject matter Religion and Ethics. This study takes as a starting point a previous study among students in upper secondary schools and their perceptions of what school has done in the aftermath of the incident, by adding teachers’ perspectives (Anker & von der Lippe 2015). The findings from the student survey showed that 22 July has almost been silenced in school, and the interviews with the teachers partly confirm this. The picture is however broadened, and shows that teachers have dealt with the issues in different ways. An important finding is that teachers´ personal and academic competencies seem to be important for whether and how controversial subjects are included in their teachings or not. Keywords: 22. July, controversial issues, democratic citizenship, religious extremism, religious education Nøkkelord: 22. juli, kontroversielle problemer, demokratisk statsborgerskap, religiøs ekstremisme, religionsundervisning
url https://journals.uio.no/prismet/article/view/4478
work_keys_str_mv AT trineanker tidforterrorlærereshandteringavkontroversiellespørsmaliskolensreligionsoglivssynsundervisning
AT marievonderlippe tidforterrorlærereshandteringavkontroversiellespørsmaliskolensreligionsoglivssynsundervisning
_version_ 1724512349307535360