Dosimetric precision of an ion beam tracking system

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Scanned ion beam therapy of intra-fractionally moving tumors requires motion mitigation. GSI proposed beam tracking and performed several experimental studies to analyse the dosimetric precision of the system for scanned carbon beams...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kraft Gerhard, Durante Marco, Schardt Dieter, Chaudhri Naved, Saito Nami, Gemmel Alexander, Bert Christoph, Rietzel Eike
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-06-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.ro-journal.com/content/5/1/61
id doaj-502a988380f44db2bb3a80bc6c4140e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-502a988380f44db2bb3a80bc6c4140e12020-11-25T01:03:05ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2010-06-01516110.1186/1748-717X-5-61Dosimetric precision of an ion beam tracking systemKraft GerhardDurante MarcoSchardt DieterChaudhri NavedSaito NamiGemmel AlexanderBert ChristophRietzel Eike<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Scanned ion beam therapy of intra-fractionally moving tumors requires motion mitigation. GSI proposed beam tracking and performed several experimental studies to analyse the dosimetric precision of the system for scanned carbon beams.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A beam tracking system has been developed and integrated in the scanned carbon ion beam therapy unit at GSI. The system adapts pencil beam positions and beam energy according to target motion.</p> <p>Motion compensation performance of the beam tracking system was assessed by measurements with radiographic films, a range telescope, a 3D array of 24 ionization chambers, and cell samples for biological dosimetry. Measurements were performed for stationary detectors and moving detectors using the beam tracking system.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>All detector systems showed comparable data for a moving setup when using beam tracking and the corresponding stationary setup. Within the target volume the mean relative differences of ionization chamber measurements were 0.3% (1.5% standard deviation, 3.7% maximum). Film responses demonstrated preserved lateral dose gradients. Measurements with the range telescope showed agreement of Bragg peak depth under motion induced range variations. Cell survival experiments showed a mean relative difference of -5% (-3%) between measurements and calculations within the target volume for beam tracking (stationary) measurements.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The beam tracking system has been successfully integrated. Full functionality has been validated dosimetrically in experiments with several detector types including biological cell systems.</p> http://www.ro-journal.com/content/5/1/61
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kraft Gerhard
Durante Marco
Schardt Dieter
Chaudhri Naved
Saito Nami
Gemmel Alexander
Bert Christoph
Rietzel Eike
spellingShingle Kraft Gerhard
Durante Marco
Schardt Dieter
Chaudhri Naved
Saito Nami
Gemmel Alexander
Bert Christoph
Rietzel Eike
Dosimetric precision of an ion beam tracking system
Radiation Oncology
author_facet Kraft Gerhard
Durante Marco
Schardt Dieter
Chaudhri Naved
Saito Nami
Gemmel Alexander
Bert Christoph
Rietzel Eike
author_sort Kraft Gerhard
title Dosimetric precision of an ion beam tracking system
title_short Dosimetric precision of an ion beam tracking system
title_full Dosimetric precision of an ion beam tracking system
title_fullStr Dosimetric precision of an ion beam tracking system
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric precision of an ion beam tracking system
title_sort dosimetric precision of an ion beam tracking system
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2010-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Scanned ion beam therapy of intra-fractionally moving tumors requires motion mitigation. GSI proposed beam tracking and performed several experimental studies to analyse the dosimetric precision of the system for scanned carbon beams.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A beam tracking system has been developed and integrated in the scanned carbon ion beam therapy unit at GSI. The system adapts pencil beam positions and beam energy according to target motion.</p> <p>Motion compensation performance of the beam tracking system was assessed by measurements with radiographic films, a range telescope, a 3D array of 24 ionization chambers, and cell samples for biological dosimetry. Measurements were performed for stationary detectors and moving detectors using the beam tracking system.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>All detector systems showed comparable data for a moving setup when using beam tracking and the corresponding stationary setup. Within the target volume the mean relative differences of ionization chamber measurements were 0.3% (1.5% standard deviation, 3.7% maximum). Film responses demonstrated preserved lateral dose gradients. Measurements with the range telescope showed agreement of Bragg peak depth under motion induced range variations. Cell survival experiments showed a mean relative difference of -5% (-3%) between measurements and calculations within the target volume for beam tracking (stationary) measurements.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The beam tracking system has been successfully integrated. Full functionality has been validated dosimetrically in experiments with several detector types including biological cell systems.</p>
url http://www.ro-journal.com/content/5/1/61
work_keys_str_mv AT kraftgerhard dosimetricprecisionofanionbeamtrackingsystem
AT durantemarco dosimetricprecisionofanionbeamtrackingsystem
AT schardtdieter dosimetricprecisionofanionbeamtrackingsystem
AT chaudhrinaved dosimetricprecisionofanionbeamtrackingsystem
AT saitonami dosimetricprecisionofanionbeamtrackingsystem
AT gemmelalexander dosimetricprecisionofanionbeamtrackingsystem
AT bertchristoph dosimetricprecisionofanionbeamtrackingsystem
AT rietzeleike dosimetricprecisionofanionbeamtrackingsystem
_version_ 1725202440183087104