A Trojan Horse in the Citadel of Stories?

Digital storytelling is an international movement for self-representation and advocacy,especially in educational, arts, and therapeutic communities. It has begun to attract a significant body of scholarship including publications and conferences. Australia has been an important player in all of thes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Hartley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2013-12-01
Series:Cultural Science
Online Access:https://culturalscience.org/articles/58
id doaj-501b22e0281b455bbdc288021c03a782
record_format Article
spelling doaj-501b22e0281b455bbdc288021c03a7822020-11-24T21:39:40ZengUbiquity PressCultural Science1836-04162013-12-01617110510.5334/csci.5858A Trojan Horse in the Citadel of Stories?John Hartley0Private TutoringDigital storytelling is an international movement for self-representation and advocacy,especially in educational, arts, and therapeutic communities. It has begun to attract a significant body of scholarship including publications and conferences. Australia has been an important player in all of these developments. In this presentation I explore some of the issues that have emerged for activists and scholars, including the problem of how to ‘scale up’ from self-expression to communication (i.e. self-marketing), and the question of the role that stories play in constituting ‘we’-communities (or ‘demes’). The paper pursues the relationship between storytelling and political narrative over the extreme long term (longue durée), using well known and lesser-known connections between Australia and Turkey to tell the tale. It considers how digital self-representation intersects with that political process, and what activists need to know in order to intervene more effectively. The paper is in five parts: (1) Gevinson; (2) Gallipoli; (3) Granddad; (4) Göbekli Tepe; (5) Gotcha? It seeks to place digital storytelling within a larger framework that links storytelling with the evolution of the polity. The analysis ultimately points to a looming problem for the digital storytelling movement – and possibly for human socio-cultural evolution too. In the crisis of ‘we’ communities that arises with the possibility of a globally networked polity, we need new guides to storytelling action, not the old (Trojan) warhorses of mainstream media. Events such as the centenary of World War I present unexpected opportunities for this kind of exploration.https://culturalscience.org/articles/58
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Hartley
spellingShingle John Hartley
A Trojan Horse in the Citadel of Stories?
Cultural Science
author_facet John Hartley
author_sort John Hartley
title A Trojan Horse in the Citadel of Stories?
title_short A Trojan Horse in the Citadel of Stories?
title_full A Trojan Horse in the Citadel of Stories?
title_fullStr A Trojan Horse in the Citadel of Stories?
title_full_unstemmed A Trojan Horse in the Citadel of Stories?
title_sort trojan horse in the citadel of stories?
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Cultural Science
issn 1836-0416
publishDate 2013-12-01
description Digital storytelling is an international movement for self-representation and advocacy,especially in educational, arts, and therapeutic communities. It has begun to attract a significant body of scholarship including publications and conferences. Australia has been an important player in all of these developments. In this presentation I explore some of the issues that have emerged for activists and scholars, including the problem of how to ‘scale up’ from self-expression to communication (i.e. self-marketing), and the question of the role that stories play in constituting ‘we’-communities (or ‘demes’). The paper pursues the relationship between storytelling and political narrative over the extreme long term (longue durée), using well known and lesser-known connections between Australia and Turkey to tell the tale. It considers how digital self-representation intersects with that political process, and what activists need to know in order to intervene more effectively. The paper is in five parts: (1) Gevinson; (2) Gallipoli; (3) Granddad; (4) Göbekli Tepe; (5) Gotcha? It seeks to place digital storytelling within a larger framework that links storytelling with the evolution of the polity. The analysis ultimately points to a looming problem for the digital storytelling movement – and possibly for human socio-cultural evolution too. In the crisis of ‘we’ communities that arises with the possibility of a globally networked polity, we need new guides to storytelling action, not the old (Trojan) warhorses of mainstream media. Events such as the centenary of World War I present unexpected opportunities for this kind of exploration.
url https://culturalscience.org/articles/58
work_keys_str_mv AT johnhartley atrojanhorseinthecitadelofstories
AT johnhartley trojanhorseinthecitadelofstories
_version_ 1725929970223546368