Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation

Abstract Background A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sheng-Hao Wang, Hsiu-Jen Lin, Hsain-Chung Shen, Ru-Yu Pan, Jui-Jung Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-04-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-x
id doaj-5019918428614509b6092858297f418f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5019918428614509b6092858297f418f2020-11-25T02:04:46ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742019-04-012011710.1186/s12891-019-2560-xBiomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixationSheng-Hao Wang0Hsiu-Jen Lin1Hsain-Chung Shen2Ru-Yu Pan3Jui-Jung Yang4Department of Orthopaedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taipei University of TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterAbstract Background A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study to compare the construct bending stiffness of a fixation midshaft clavicle fracture with a Knowles pin, cannulated screw and reconstruction plate. In addition, purchase lengths of both intramedullary devices were measured. Methods After transverse osteotomy over the midpoint for fracture simulation, eighteen synthetic clavicles were assigned to 3 groups and fixed with reconstruction plate, Knowles pin or cannulated screw. Purchase length was defined as the engaged length of the intramedullary portion of the two intramedullary devices Stiffness, yield load and maximum load of the cantilever bending test were calculated of each tested synthetic bones. Results The Knowles pin group had a significantly longer average intramedullary purchase length compared with that of the cannulated screw group. The construct stiffness in the reconstruction plate group (5.6 ± 0.9 N/mm) was higher than that of the intramedullary devices; the Knowles pin group (3.1 ± 0.6 N/mm) provided a greater construct stiffness than did the cannulated screw group (1.7 ± 0.4 N/mm) (p = 0.007). The cannulated screw group had the lowest yield and maximum load compared with the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin groups. Both the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin failed at the implant-bone interface. However, the cannulated screw group failed at the osteotomy site with broken implants. Conclusion This study suggests that fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures with cannulated screws may lead to early failure due to inadequate mechanical strength. Ideal intramedullary clavicle devices should supply adequate intramedullary purchase lengths and mechanical strength.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-xIntramedullary deviceMidshaft clavicle fractureCannulated screw
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sheng-Hao Wang
Hsiu-Jen Lin
Hsain-Chung Shen
Ru-Yu Pan
Jui-Jung Yang
spellingShingle Sheng-Hao Wang
Hsiu-Jen Lin
Hsain-Chung Shen
Ru-Yu Pan
Jui-Jung Yang
Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Intramedullary device
Midshaft clavicle fracture
Cannulated screw
author_facet Sheng-Hao Wang
Hsiu-Jen Lin
Hsain-Chung Shen
Ru-Yu Pan
Jui-Jung Yang
author_sort Sheng-Hao Wang
title Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title_short Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title_full Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title_sort biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Abstract Background A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study to compare the construct bending stiffness of a fixation midshaft clavicle fracture with a Knowles pin, cannulated screw and reconstruction plate. In addition, purchase lengths of both intramedullary devices were measured. Methods After transverse osteotomy over the midpoint for fracture simulation, eighteen synthetic clavicles were assigned to 3 groups and fixed with reconstruction plate, Knowles pin or cannulated screw. Purchase length was defined as the engaged length of the intramedullary portion of the two intramedullary devices Stiffness, yield load and maximum load of the cantilever bending test were calculated of each tested synthetic bones. Results The Knowles pin group had a significantly longer average intramedullary purchase length compared with that of the cannulated screw group. The construct stiffness in the reconstruction plate group (5.6 ± 0.9 N/mm) was higher than that of the intramedullary devices; the Knowles pin group (3.1 ± 0.6 N/mm) provided a greater construct stiffness than did the cannulated screw group (1.7 ± 0.4 N/mm) (p = 0.007). The cannulated screw group had the lowest yield and maximum load compared with the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin groups. Both the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin failed at the implant-bone interface. However, the cannulated screw group failed at the osteotomy site with broken implants. Conclusion This study suggests that fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures with cannulated screws may lead to early failure due to inadequate mechanical strength. Ideal intramedullary clavicle devices should supply adequate intramedullary purchase lengths and mechanical strength.
topic Intramedullary device
Midshaft clavicle fracture
Cannulated screw
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-x
work_keys_str_mv AT shenghaowang biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation
AT hsiujenlin biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation
AT hsainchungshen biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation
AT ruyupan biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation
AT juijungyang biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation
_version_ 1724941229315063808