Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
Abstract Background A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-x |
id |
doaj-5019918428614509b6092858297f418f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5019918428614509b6092858297f418f2020-11-25T02:04:46ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742019-04-012011710.1186/s12891-019-2560-xBiomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixationSheng-Hao Wang0Hsiu-Jen Lin1Hsain-Chung Shen2Ru-Yu Pan3Jui-Jung Yang4Department of Orthopaedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taipei University of TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterAbstract Background A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study to compare the construct bending stiffness of a fixation midshaft clavicle fracture with a Knowles pin, cannulated screw and reconstruction plate. In addition, purchase lengths of both intramedullary devices were measured. Methods After transverse osteotomy over the midpoint for fracture simulation, eighteen synthetic clavicles were assigned to 3 groups and fixed with reconstruction plate, Knowles pin or cannulated screw. Purchase length was defined as the engaged length of the intramedullary portion of the two intramedullary devices Stiffness, yield load and maximum load of the cantilever bending test were calculated of each tested synthetic bones. Results The Knowles pin group had a significantly longer average intramedullary purchase length compared with that of the cannulated screw group. The construct stiffness in the reconstruction plate group (5.6 ± 0.9 N/mm) was higher than that of the intramedullary devices; the Knowles pin group (3.1 ± 0.6 N/mm) provided a greater construct stiffness than did the cannulated screw group (1.7 ± 0.4 N/mm) (p = 0.007). The cannulated screw group had the lowest yield and maximum load compared with the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin groups. Both the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin failed at the implant-bone interface. However, the cannulated screw group failed at the osteotomy site with broken implants. Conclusion This study suggests that fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures with cannulated screws may lead to early failure due to inadequate mechanical strength. Ideal intramedullary clavicle devices should supply adequate intramedullary purchase lengths and mechanical strength.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-xIntramedullary deviceMidshaft clavicle fractureCannulated screw |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sheng-Hao Wang Hsiu-Jen Lin Hsain-Chung Shen Ru-Yu Pan Jui-Jung Yang |
spellingShingle |
Sheng-Hao Wang Hsiu-Jen Lin Hsain-Chung Shen Ru-Yu Pan Jui-Jung Yang Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Intramedullary device Midshaft clavicle fracture Cannulated screw |
author_facet |
Sheng-Hao Wang Hsiu-Jen Lin Hsain-Chung Shen Ru-Yu Pan Jui-Jung Yang |
author_sort |
Sheng-Hao Wang |
title |
Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title_short |
Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title_full |
Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title_fullStr |
Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title_sort |
biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
issn |
1471-2474 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study to compare the construct bending stiffness of a fixation midshaft clavicle fracture with a Knowles pin, cannulated screw and reconstruction plate. In addition, purchase lengths of both intramedullary devices were measured. Methods After transverse osteotomy over the midpoint for fracture simulation, eighteen synthetic clavicles were assigned to 3 groups and fixed with reconstruction plate, Knowles pin or cannulated screw. Purchase length was defined as the engaged length of the intramedullary portion of the two intramedullary devices Stiffness, yield load and maximum load of the cantilever bending test were calculated of each tested synthetic bones. Results The Knowles pin group had a significantly longer average intramedullary purchase length compared with that of the cannulated screw group. The construct stiffness in the reconstruction plate group (5.6 ± 0.9 N/mm) was higher than that of the intramedullary devices; the Knowles pin group (3.1 ± 0.6 N/mm) provided a greater construct stiffness than did the cannulated screw group (1.7 ± 0.4 N/mm) (p = 0.007). The cannulated screw group had the lowest yield and maximum load compared with the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin groups. Both the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin failed at the implant-bone interface. However, the cannulated screw group failed at the osteotomy site with broken implants. Conclusion This study suggests that fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures with cannulated screws may lead to early failure due to inadequate mechanical strength. Ideal intramedullary clavicle devices should supply adequate intramedullary purchase lengths and mechanical strength. |
topic |
Intramedullary device Midshaft clavicle fracture Cannulated screw |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shenghaowang biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation AT hsiujenlin biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation AT hsainchungshen biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation AT ruyupan biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation AT juijungyang biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation |
_version_ |
1724941229315063808 |