Rail Transport of Hazardous Substances from the Perspective of ‘All Hazard’ Risk Management

In the Netherlands the method of Quantitative Risk Analysis for external safety risks of transport of hazardous substances is solely focused on fatal casualties. The transference of this methodology into spatial planning principles results in limited safety zones wherein expensive measures are requi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ruud Houdijk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2016-04-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/3444
id doaj-50194790739149848e508b9d43aa83ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50194790739149848e508b9d43aa83ce2021-02-19T21:12:10ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162016-04-014810.3303/CET1648159Rail Transport of Hazardous Substances from the Perspective of ‘All Hazard’ Risk ManagementRuud HoudijkIn the Netherlands the method of Quantitative Risk Analysis for external safety risks of transport of hazardous substances is solely focused on fatal casualties. The transference of this methodology into spatial planning principles results in limited safety zones wherein expensive measures are required. In the EU PRISMA project this current approach was compared to the new Dutch ‘all hazard’ risk assessment methodology. In this method the scope of the assessment is broadened to all kinds of impacts, including physical, economic, ecological and social effects. Using event tree analysis for all these impacts, a broad set of potential prevention measures can be identified. A preliminary societal cost-benefit analysis has indicated that cheaper safety measures in a much larger zone could be advisable, as well as protecting against other kinds of scenarios. A whole different approach towards spatial safety comes into view, aimed at correlating spatial zones with the cost-benefit ratio of measures for different scenarios, from an ‘all hazard’ and ‘all impact’ perspective and in cooperation with all relevant stakeholders.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/3444
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ruud Houdijk
spellingShingle Ruud Houdijk
Rail Transport of Hazardous Substances from the Perspective of ‘All Hazard’ Risk Management
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet Ruud Houdijk
author_sort Ruud Houdijk
title Rail Transport of Hazardous Substances from the Perspective of ‘All Hazard’ Risk Management
title_short Rail Transport of Hazardous Substances from the Perspective of ‘All Hazard’ Risk Management
title_full Rail Transport of Hazardous Substances from the Perspective of ‘All Hazard’ Risk Management
title_fullStr Rail Transport of Hazardous Substances from the Perspective of ‘All Hazard’ Risk Management
title_full_unstemmed Rail Transport of Hazardous Substances from the Perspective of ‘All Hazard’ Risk Management
title_sort rail transport of hazardous substances from the perspective of ‘all hazard’ risk management
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2016-04-01
description In the Netherlands the method of Quantitative Risk Analysis for external safety risks of transport of hazardous substances is solely focused on fatal casualties. The transference of this methodology into spatial planning principles results in limited safety zones wherein expensive measures are required. In the EU PRISMA project this current approach was compared to the new Dutch ‘all hazard’ risk assessment methodology. In this method the scope of the assessment is broadened to all kinds of impacts, including physical, economic, ecological and social effects. Using event tree analysis for all these impacts, a broad set of potential prevention measures can be identified. A preliminary societal cost-benefit analysis has indicated that cheaper safety measures in a much larger zone could be advisable, as well as protecting against other kinds of scenarios. A whole different approach towards spatial safety comes into view, aimed at correlating spatial zones with the cost-benefit ratio of measures for different scenarios, from an ‘all hazard’ and ‘all impact’ perspective and in cooperation with all relevant stakeholders.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/3444
work_keys_str_mv AT ruudhoudijk railtransportofhazardoussubstancesfromtheperspectiveofallhazardriskmanagement
_version_ 1724260297040986112