Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation

This article presents the results of applying various methods of system analysis (CATWOE, Rich Picture, AHP, Fuzzy AHP) to evaluation of teaching assistants. The soft and hard methods were applied. Methods of system analysis are considered as an example at the Higher School of Economics (HSE) in pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. . Beresneva, M. . Gordenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2018-10-01
Series:Труды Института системного программирования РАН
Subjects:
ahp
Online Access:https://ispranproceedings.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/534
id doaj-5017b19fd0ab48ad982ce048b3e38365
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5017b19fd0ab48ad982ce048b3e383652020-11-25T01:51:38Zeng Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of SciencesТруды Института системного программирования РАН2079-81562220-64262018-10-0130325127010.15514/ISPRAS-2018-30(3)-18534Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluationE. . Beresneva0M. . Gordenko1Департамент программной инженерии, Национальный исследовательский университет “Высшая школа экономики”Департамент программной инженерии, Национальный исследовательский университет “Высшая школа экономики”This article presents the results of applying various methods of system analysis (CATWOE, Rich Picture, AHP, Fuzzy AHP) to evaluation of teaching assistants. The soft and hard methods were applied. Methods of system analysis are considered as an example at the Higher School of Economics (HSE) in program “Teaching assistant”. The article shows the process of interaction of teaching assistants with students and faculty in the form of Rich Picture. Selection and analysis of criteria for the evaluation of training assistants are carried out. Three groups of criteria were defined: professional skills, communicating skills, personal qualities. Each group has some subcriteria, which were defined in brainstorm. Its own method was determined, which immediately allow drop some assistants. In addition, the application of the methods AHP and Fuzzy AHP type-2 to evaluate teaching assistants is considered. The strengths and weaknesses of each method are revealed. It is also shown that, despite the power of the methods of system analysis, it is necessary to use common sense and logic. Do not rely only on the numbers obtained by the methods of system analysis. In the process of work, the best teaching assistant is selected, and the group of the best teaching assistants is defined.https://ispranproceedings.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/534системный анализкомбинация soft и hard методовмногокритериальное принятие решенийahpfuzzy type-2 ahpнечеткие множества
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. . Beresneva
M. . Gordenko
spellingShingle E. . Beresneva
M. . Gordenko
Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation
Труды Института системного программирования РАН
системный анализ
комбинация soft и hard методов
многокритериальное принятие решений
ahp
fuzzy type-2 ahp
нечеткие множества
author_facet E. . Beresneva
M. . Gordenko
author_sort E. . Beresneva
title Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation
title_short Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation
title_full Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation
title_fullStr Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation
title_sort applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation
publisher Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of Sciences
series Труды Института системного программирования РАН
issn 2079-8156
2220-6426
publishDate 2018-10-01
description This article presents the results of applying various methods of system analysis (CATWOE, Rich Picture, AHP, Fuzzy AHP) to evaluation of teaching assistants. The soft and hard methods were applied. Methods of system analysis are considered as an example at the Higher School of Economics (HSE) in program “Teaching assistant”. The article shows the process of interaction of teaching assistants with students and faculty in the form of Rich Picture. Selection and analysis of criteria for the evaluation of training assistants are carried out. Three groups of criteria were defined: professional skills, communicating skills, personal qualities. Each group has some subcriteria, which were defined in brainstorm. Its own method was determined, which immediately allow drop some assistants. In addition, the application of the methods AHP and Fuzzy AHP type-2 to evaluate teaching assistants is considered. The strengths and weaknesses of each method are revealed. It is also shown that, despite the power of the methods of system analysis, it is necessary to use common sense and logic. Do not rely only on the numbers obtained by the methods of system analysis. In the process of work, the best teaching assistant is selected, and the group of the best teaching assistants is defined.
topic системный анализ
комбинация soft и hard методов
многокритериальное принятие решений
ahp
fuzzy type-2 ahp
нечеткие множества
url https://ispranproceedings.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/534
work_keys_str_mv AT eberesneva applyingthemethodsofsystemanalysistoteachingassistantsevaluation
AT mgordenko applyingthemethodsofsystemanalysistoteachingassistantsevaluation
_version_ 1724997225019342848