Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation
This article presents the results of applying various methods of system analysis (CATWOE, Rich Picture, AHP, Fuzzy AHP) to evaluation of teaching assistants. The soft and hard methods were applied. Methods of system analysis are considered as an example at the Higher School of Economics (HSE) in pro...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Труды Института системного программирования РАН |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ispranproceedings.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/534 |
id |
doaj-5017b19fd0ab48ad982ce048b3e38365 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5017b19fd0ab48ad982ce048b3e383652020-11-25T01:51:38Zeng Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of SciencesТруды Института системного программирования РАН2079-81562220-64262018-10-0130325127010.15514/ISPRAS-2018-30(3)-18534Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluationE. . Beresneva0M. . Gordenko1Департамент программной инженерии, Национальный исследовательский университет “Высшая школа экономики”Департамент программной инженерии, Национальный исследовательский университет “Высшая школа экономики”This article presents the results of applying various methods of system analysis (CATWOE, Rich Picture, AHP, Fuzzy AHP) to evaluation of teaching assistants. The soft and hard methods were applied. Methods of system analysis are considered as an example at the Higher School of Economics (HSE) in program “Teaching assistant”. The article shows the process of interaction of teaching assistants with students and faculty in the form of Rich Picture. Selection and analysis of criteria for the evaluation of training assistants are carried out. Three groups of criteria were defined: professional skills, communicating skills, personal qualities. Each group has some subcriteria, which were defined in brainstorm. Its own method was determined, which immediately allow drop some assistants. In addition, the application of the methods AHP and Fuzzy AHP type-2 to evaluate teaching assistants is considered. The strengths and weaknesses of each method are revealed. It is also shown that, despite the power of the methods of system analysis, it is necessary to use common sense and logic. Do not rely only on the numbers obtained by the methods of system analysis. In the process of work, the best teaching assistant is selected, and the group of the best teaching assistants is defined.https://ispranproceedings.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/534системный анализкомбинация soft и hard методовмногокритериальное принятие решенийahpfuzzy type-2 ahpнечеткие множества |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
E. . Beresneva M. . Gordenko |
spellingShingle |
E. . Beresneva M. . Gordenko Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation Труды Института системного программирования РАН системный анализ комбинация soft и hard методов многокритериальное принятие решений ahp fuzzy type-2 ahp нечеткие множества |
author_facet |
E. . Beresneva M. . Gordenko |
author_sort |
E. . Beresneva |
title |
Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation |
title_short |
Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation |
title_full |
Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation |
title_fullStr |
Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation |
title_sort |
applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation |
publisher |
Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of Sciences |
series |
Труды Института системного программирования РАН |
issn |
2079-8156 2220-6426 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
This article presents the results of applying various methods of system analysis (CATWOE, Rich Picture, AHP, Fuzzy AHP) to evaluation of teaching assistants. The soft and hard methods were applied. Methods of system analysis are considered as an example at the Higher School of Economics (HSE) in program “Teaching assistant”. The article shows the process of interaction of teaching assistants with students and faculty in the form of Rich Picture. Selection and analysis of criteria for the evaluation of training assistants are carried out. Three groups of criteria were defined: professional skills, communicating skills, personal qualities. Each group has some subcriteria, which were defined in brainstorm. Its own method was determined, which immediately allow drop some assistants. In addition, the application of the methods AHP and Fuzzy AHP type-2 to evaluate teaching assistants is considered. The strengths and weaknesses of each method are revealed. It is also shown that, despite the power of the methods of system analysis, it is necessary to use common sense and logic. Do not rely only on the numbers obtained by the methods of system analysis. In the process of work, the best teaching assistant is selected, and the group of the best teaching assistants is defined. |
topic |
системный анализ комбинация soft и hard методов многокритериальное принятие решений ahp fuzzy type-2 ahp нечеткие множества |
url |
https://ispranproceedings.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/534 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eberesneva applyingthemethodsofsystemanalysistoteachingassistantsevaluation AT mgordenko applyingthemethodsofsystemanalysistoteachingassistantsevaluation |
_version_ |
1724997225019342848 |