Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S)
Background Many studies have revealed the positive impact of mindfulness training on mental health and proposed equanimity as a general outcome in contemplative research. Despite recent interest, relatively few studies have empirically examined equanimity and measurement instruments are still lackin...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020-07-01
|
Series: | PeerJ |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/9405.pdf |
id |
doaj-5013ef36d351463b8c945bbe03664a28 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5013ef36d351463b8c945bbe03664a282020-11-25T03:42:13ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592020-07-018e940510.7717/peerj.9405Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S)Catherine Juneau0Nicolas Pellerin1Elliott Trives2Matthieu Ricard3Rébecca Shankland4Michael Dambrun5LAPSCO CNRS UMR 6024, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceCLLE-LTC CNRS UMR 5263, Université de Toulouse-le-Mirail (Toulouse II), Toulouse, FranceLAPCOS, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, FranceMind and Life Institute, Shechen Monastery, Kathmandu, NepalLIP/PC2S, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, FranceLAPSCO CNRS UMR 6024, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceBackground Many studies have revealed the positive impact of mindfulness training on mental health and proposed equanimity as a general outcome in contemplative research. Despite recent interest, relatively few studies have empirically examined equanimity and measurement instruments are still lacking. The main goal of this study was to develop an Equanimity Scale (the EQUA-S) in a Western population with or without meditation experience, based on previous definitions of equanimity, in order to investigate its relations with the relevant psychological constructs and health outcomes. Methods Adults from the general population (N = 265; Mage = 34.81) completed various measures: the EQUA-S, mindfulness, hyper-sensitivity, avoidance and fusion, impulsivity, personality, alexithymia, sensitivity to punishment and reward and frequency of problematic addictive behaviors. The dimensionality of the EQUA-S was examined using Factor Analyses. The convergent validity of this new scale was investigated using Pearson’s Correlations. Results The results of a factor analysis revealed two dimensions of equanimity: an even-minded state of mind (E-MSM) and a hedonic independence (HI) component. While the E-MSM was positively related to emotional stability, adaptive emotional regulation and several mindfulness-related abilities, HI was found to correlate negatively with addictive issues. Discussion The relations with personality constructs and possible related cognitive processes are discussed.https://peerj.com/articles/9405.pdfEquanimityEven-minded state of mindHedonic independenceEQUA-SEmotional regulationMindfulness |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Catherine Juneau Nicolas Pellerin Elliott Trives Matthieu Ricard Rébecca Shankland Michael Dambrun |
spellingShingle |
Catherine Juneau Nicolas Pellerin Elliott Trives Matthieu Ricard Rébecca Shankland Michael Dambrun Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) PeerJ Equanimity Even-minded state of mind Hedonic independence EQUA-S Emotional regulation Mindfulness |
author_facet |
Catherine Juneau Nicolas Pellerin Elliott Trives Matthieu Ricard Rébecca Shankland Michael Dambrun |
author_sort |
Catherine Juneau |
title |
Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title_short |
Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title_full |
Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title_fullStr |
Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S) |
title_sort |
reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: the two-factor equanimity scale (equa-s) |
publisher |
PeerJ Inc. |
series |
PeerJ |
issn |
2167-8359 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Background Many studies have revealed the positive impact of mindfulness training on mental health and proposed equanimity as a general outcome in contemplative research. Despite recent interest, relatively few studies have empirically examined equanimity and measurement instruments are still lacking. The main goal of this study was to develop an Equanimity Scale (the EQUA-S) in a Western population with or without meditation experience, based on previous definitions of equanimity, in order to investigate its relations with the relevant psychological constructs and health outcomes. Methods Adults from the general population (N = 265; Mage = 34.81) completed various measures: the EQUA-S, mindfulness, hyper-sensitivity, avoidance and fusion, impulsivity, personality, alexithymia, sensitivity to punishment and reward and frequency of problematic addictive behaviors. The dimensionality of the EQUA-S was examined using Factor Analyses. The convergent validity of this new scale was investigated using Pearson’s Correlations. Results The results of a factor analysis revealed two dimensions of equanimity: an even-minded state of mind (E-MSM) and a hedonic independence (HI) component. While the E-MSM was positively related to emotional stability, adaptive emotional regulation and several mindfulness-related abilities, HI was found to correlate negatively with addictive issues. Discussion The relations with personality constructs and possible related cognitive processes are discussed. |
topic |
Equanimity Even-minded state of mind Hedonic independence EQUA-S Emotional regulation Mindfulness |
url |
https://peerj.com/articles/9405.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT catherinejuneau reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas AT nicolaspellerin reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas AT elliotttrives reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas AT matthieuricard reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas AT rebeccashankland reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas AT michaeldambrun reliabilityandvalidityofanequanimityquestionnairethetwofactorequanimityscaleequas |
_version_ |
1724526404239884288 |