The ceramic complex of the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1

This paper presents the results of the study of the ceramics collection from two periods — Eneolithic and Medieval, assembled during the fieldwork at the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1 in the Northern Priobye (Western Siberia). The Eneolithic ware is represented by fragments of 30 vessels dec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chikunova I.Yu., Ilyushina V.V.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RA 2021-08-01
Series:Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ipdn.ru/_private/a54/59-76.pdf
id doaj-4ff7f3e0a5ec40c9931f981e26f6992f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ff7f3e0a5ec40c9931f981e26f6992f2021-09-23T10:12:12ZrusTyumen Scientific Centre SB RAВестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии1811-74652071-04372021-08-013(54)597610.20874/2071-0437-2021-54-3-5The ceramic complex of the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1 Chikunova I.Yu.0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-7198 Ilyushina V.V. 1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1517-0101Tyumen Scientific Centre of Siberian Branch RASTyumen Scientific Centre of Siberian Branch RAS This paper presents the results of the study of the ceramics collection from two periods — Eneolithic and Medieval, assembled during the fieldwork at the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1 in the Northern Priobye (Western Siberia). The Eneolithic ware is represented by fragments of 30 vessels decorated with alveolate, rhombic, nail-imprints, and corner patterns. There are fragments of a boat-shaped vessel and vessels with handles. The complex has analogies in the materials of the settlement of Gorny Samotnel-1 and is dated to the end of the 4th–3rd centuries BC. The Medieval ceramics are represented by 296 vessels. On the basis of typological analysis, two groups of vessels have been identified: group 1 ware with sparing ornamentation comprising 1–4 lines of the ornament; and group 2 ware with an ornament comprising 5–8 and more lines. A characteristic feature of the group 2 vessels is the use of a cord and various shaped stamps. In the cultural layer of the settlement, ceramics of both groups was deposited side by side, which suggests their contemporaneity. In order to determine the degree of similarity/difference of the derived groups of vessels, a technical-technological analysis was carried out on 20 items. It appeared that potters who manufactured the group 1 vessels routinely used blend compositions of grus and grus with wool. Organic mortars were rarely used. The smoo-thing of the vessels was performed mainly with a wood splinter, knife, or spatula. The craftsmen who manufactured the vessels of group 2 used medium to heavily oversanded clays along with slightly oversanded material. While making the molding compositions, a blend of grus and organic mortar was used more often. Wool was rarely utilised. The vessels were smoothed with soft materials and a knife or spatula, the outer surfaces were subjected to hand tamping. The noted differences suggest, that in the Middle Ages two groups of potters, who had distinctive pottery-making skills, were living at the settlement. Vessels of the group 1 have similarities with materials of the “Bichevnik” type from the Pechersky Trans-Urals, whereas vessels of the group 2 in the materials of the Yarsalinsky, Ust’-Poluisky, and Yudinsky Cultures of the Iron Age and Early Middle Ages of the Middle and Lower Priobye and Lower Tobol River region. Obtained radiocarbon dates and some artefacts (a bronze signet ring and an iron dagger), which have analogies in the Middle Trans-Urals, define the time span of the activity for the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1 within the 7th–13th centuries.http://www.ipdn.ru/_private/a54/59-76.pdfnorthern ob regioneneolithic epochmedieval epochceramic complextechnical and technological analysis
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chikunova I.Yu.
Ilyushina V.V.
spellingShingle Chikunova I.Yu.
Ilyushina V.V.
The ceramic complex of the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1
Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии
northern ob region
eneolithic epoch
medieval epoch
ceramic complex
technical and technological analysis
author_facet Chikunova I.Yu.
Ilyushina V.V.
author_sort Chikunova I.Yu.
title The ceramic complex of the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1
title_short The ceramic complex of the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1
title_full The ceramic complex of the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1
title_fullStr The ceramic complex of the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1
title_full_unstemmed The ceramic complex of the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1
title_sort ceramic complex of the ancient settlement of ust-vasyegan 1
publisher Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RA
series Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии
issn 1811-7465
2071-0437
publishDate 2021-08-01
description This paper presents the results of the study of the ceramics collection from two periods — Eneolithic and Medieval, assembled during the fieldwork at the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1 in the Northern Priobye (Western Siberia). The Eneolithic ware is represented by fragments of 30 vessels decorated with alveolate, rhombic, nail-imprints, and corner patterns. There are fragments of a boat-shaped vessel and vessels with handles. The complex has analogies in the materials of the settlement of Gorny Samotnel-1 and is dated to the end of the 4th–3rd centuries BC. The Medieval ceramics are represented by 296 vessels. On the basis of typological analysis, two groups of vessels have been identified: group 1 ware with sparing ornamentation comprising 1–4 lines of the ornament; and group 2 ware with an ornament comprising 5–8 and more lines. A characteristic feature of the group 2 vessels is the use of a cord and various shaped stamps. In the cultural layer of the settlement, ceramics of both groups was deposited side by side, which suggests their contemporaneity. In order to determine the degree of similarity/difference of the derived groups of vessels, a technical-technological analysis was carried out on 20 items. It appeared that potters who manufactured the group 1 vessels routinely used blend compositions of grus and grus with wool. Organic mortars were rarely used. The smoo-thing of the vessels was performed mainly with a wood splinter, knife, or spatula. The craftsmen who manufactured the vessels of group 2 used medium to heavily oversanded clays along with slightly oversanded material. While making the molding compositions, a blend of grus and organic mortar was used more often. Wool was rarely utilised. The vessels were smoothed with soft materials and a knife or spatula, the outer surfaces were subjected to hand tamping. The noted differences suggest, that in the Middle Ages two groups of potters, who had distinctive pottery-making skills, were living at the settlement. Vessels of the group 1 have similarities with materials of the “Bichevnik” type from the Pechersky Trans-Urals, whereas vessels of the group 2 in the materials of the Yarsalinsky, Ust’-Poluisky, and Yudinsky Cultures of the Iron Age and Early Middle Ages of the Middle and Lower Priobye and Lower Tobol River region. Obtained radiocarbon dates and some artefacts (a bronze signet ring and an iron dagger), which have analogies in the Middle Trans-Urals, define the time span of the activity for the ancient settlement of Ust-Vasyegan 1 within the 7th–13th centuries.
topic northern ob region
eneolithic epoch
medieval epoch
ceramic complex
technical and technological analysis
url http://www.ipdn.ru/_private/a54/59-76.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT chikunovaiyu theceramiccomplexoftheancientsettlementofustvasyegan1
AT ilyushinavv theceramiccomplexoftheancientsettlementofustvasyegan1
AT chikunovaiyu ceramiccomplexoftheancientsettlementofustvasyegan1
AT ilyushinavv ceramiccomplexoftheancientsettlementofustvasyegan1
_version_ 1717370519931584512