To have or not to have: the true privacy question

In light of the recent US National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance scandals, the article reflects on the continued importance of privacy in the information age. Based on a taxonomy of privacy violations provided by Daniel Solove, it takes the reader on an imaginary journey to a world in which pri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paula Kift
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society 2013-12-01
Series:Internet Policy Review
Online Access:https://policyreview.info/node/223
id doaj-4fc94277fd8041d9a2fd57293de4ddfb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4fc94277fd8041d9a2fd57293de4ddfb2020-11-25T02:05:51ZengAlexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and SocietyInternet Policy Review2197-67752013-12-01Volume 2Issue 410.14763/2013.4.223To have or not to have: the true privacy questionPaula Kift0Global Public Policy Institute, BerlinIn light of the recent US National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance scandals, the article reflects on the continued importance of privacy in the information age. Based on a taxonomy of privacy violations provided by Daniel Solove, it takes the reader on an imaginary journey to a world in which privacy has ceased to exist. What does it mean “to have or not to have privacy” in the information age? This essay, part academic, part call for action, explores this question by means of an analogy, focusing on the relationship between citizens and the state. It demonstrates that the invisible presence of the NSA should be a matter of great concern to us. There is no justification for blanket surveillance. The right to security is an illusion. Instead of fighting windmills, we should fight for our right to privacy instead. We need to have privacy; we need it to live and love, to make mistakes, and to grow. We need it as individuals and as a society. And we can have it if we press our legislators to return it to us. It is time to start fighting back.https://policyreview.info/node/223
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paula Kift
spellingShingle Paula Kift
To have or not to have: the true privacy question
Internet Policy Review
author_facet Paula Kift
author_sort Paula Kift
title To have or not to have: the true privacy question
title_short To have or not to have: the true privacy question
title_full To have or not to have: the true privacy question
title_fullStr To have or not to have: the true privacy question
title_full_unstemmed To have or not to have: the true privacy question
title_sort to have or not to have: the true privacy question
publisher Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
series Internet Policy Review
issn 2197-6775
publishDate 2013-12-01
description In light of the recent US National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance scandals, the article reflects on the continued importance of privacy in the information age. Based on a taxonomy of privacy violations provided by Daniel Solove, it takes the reader on an imaginary journey to a world in which privacy has ceased to exist. What does it mean “to have or not to have privacy” in the information age? This essay, part academic, part call for action, explores this question by means of an analogy, focusing on the relationship between citizens and the state. It demonstrates that the invisible presence of the NSA should be a matter of great concern to us. There is no justification for blanket surveillance. The right to security is an illusion. Instead of fighting windmills, we should fight for our right to privacy instead. We need to have privacy; we need it to live and love, to make mistakes, and to grow. We need it as individuals and as a society. And we can have it if we press our legislators to return it to us. It is time to start fighting back.
url https://policyreview.info/node/223
work_keys_str_mv AT paulakift tohaveornottohavethetrueprivacyquestion
_version_ 1724936560365797376