Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne

The purpose of this study is to test the validity and reliability of three collaboration indices (quantity, equality, and shareness) proposed by Jahng et al. (2010). The present study repeated the quantitative assessment of Jahng et al., and performed a further qualitative analysis to identify possi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Namsook Jahng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Canadian Network for Innovation in Education (CNIE) 2013-02-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26323
id doaj-4fbe21d3319343a488f9980853409b81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4fbe21d3319343a488f9980853409b812020-11-24T21:18:04ZengThe Canadian Network for Innovation in Education (CNIE)Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology1499-66771499-66852013-02-0139110.21432/T2Z30Q17924Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligneNamsook Jahng0University of British ColumbiaThe purpose of this study is to test the validity and reliability of three collaboration indices (quantity, equality, and shareness) proposed by Jahng et al. (2010). The present study repeated the quantitative assessment of Jahng et al., and performed a further qualitative analysis to identify possible factors that might be associated with the results of the quantitative assessment. In addition, membership trends, in terms of communication connections in whole class discussions, were examined and compared with results from both the quantitative and qualitative assessments. The quantitative assessment results were consistent with those of the qualitative assessment and the membership trends. Therefore, the study concludes that the three quantitative collaboration indices are valhttps://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26323quantity, equality, shareness, interaction, quantitative, index
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Namsook Jahng
spellingShingle Namsook Jahng
Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne
Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology
quantity, equality, shareness, interaction, quantitative, index
author_facet Namsook Jahng
author_sort Namsook Jahng
title Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne
title_short Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne
title_full Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne
title_fullStr Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne
title_full_unstemmed Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne
title_sort collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne
publisher The Canadian Network for Innovation in Education (CNIE)
series Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology
issn 1499-6677
1499-6685
publishDate 2013-02-01
description The purpose of this study is to test the validity and reliability of three collaboration indices (quantity, equality, and shareness) proposed by Jahng et al. (2010). The present study repeated the quantitative assessment of Jahng et al., and performed a further qualitative analysis to identify possible factors that might be associated with the results of the quantitative assessment. In addition, membership trends, in terms of communication connections in whole class discussions, were examined and compared with results from both the quantitative and qualitative assessments. The quantitative assessment results were consistent with those of the qualitative assessment and the membership trends. Therefore, the study concludes that the three quantitative collaboration indices are val
topic quantity, equality, shareness, interaction, quantitative, index
url https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26323
work_keys_str_mv AT namsookjahng collaborationindicesformonitoringpotentialproblemsinonlinesmallgroupsindicateursdecollaborationpourdiagnostiquerdesproblemespotentielsdansdepetitsgroupesenligne
_version_ 1726010468599857152