Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne
The purpose of this study is to test the validity and reliability of three collaboration indices (quantity, equality, and shareness) proposed by Jahng et al. (2010). The present study repeated the quantitative assessment of Jahng et al., and performed a further qualitative analysis to identify possi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Canadian Network for Innovation in Education (CNIE)
2013-02-01
|
Series: | Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26323 |
id |
doaj-4fbe21d3319343a488f9980853409b81 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4fbe21d3319343a488f9980853409b812020-11-24T21:18:04ZengThe Canadian Network for Innovation in Education (CNIE)Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology1499-66771499-66852013-02-0139110.21432/T2Z30Q17924Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligneNamsook Jahng0University of British ColumbiaThe purpose of this study is to test the validity and reliability of three collaboration indices (quantity, equality, and shareness) proposed by Jahng et al. (2010). The present study repeated the quantitative assessment of Jahng et al., and performed a further qualitative analysis to identify possible factors that might be associated with the results of the quantitative assessment. In addition, membership trends, in terms of communication connections in whole class discussions, were examined and compared with results from both the quantitative and qualitative assessments. The quantitative assessment results were consistent with those of the qualitative assessment and the membership trends. Therefore, the study concludes that the three quantitative collaboration indices are valhttps://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26323quantity, equality, shareness, interaction, quantitative, index |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Namsook Jahng |
spellingShingle |
Namsook Jahng Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology quantity, equality, shareness, interaction, quantitative, index |
author_facet |
Namsook Jahng |
author_sort |
Namsook Jahng |
title |
Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne |
title_short |
Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne |
title_full |
Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne |
title_fullStr |
Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne |
title_full_unstemmed |
Collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / Indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne |
title_sort |
collaboration indices for monitoring potential problems in online small groups / indicateurs de collaboration pour diagnostiquer des problèmes potentiels dans de petits groupes en ligne |
publisher |
The Canadian Network for Innovation in Education (CNIE) |
series |
Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology |
issn |
1499-6677 1499-6685 |
publishDate |
2013-02-01 |
description |
The purpose of this study is to test the validity and reliability of three collaboration indices (quantity, equality, and shareness) proposed by Jahng et al. (2010). The present study repeated the quantitative assessment of Jahng et al., and performed a further qualitative analysis to identify possible factors that might be associated with the results of the quantitative assessment. In addition, membership trends, in terms of communication connections in whole class discussions, were examined and compared with results from both the quantitative and qualitative assessments. The quantitative assessment results were consistent with those of the qualitative assessment and the membership trends. Therefore, the study concludes that the three quantitative collaboration indices are val |
topic |
quantity, equality, shareness, interaction, quantitative, index |
url |
https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26323 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT namsookjahng collaborationindicesformonitoringpotentialproblemsinonlinesmallgroupsindicateursdecollaborationpourdiagnostiquerdesproblemespotentielsdansdepetitsgroupesenligne |
_version_ |
1726010468599857152 |