Participant informed consent in cluster randomized trials: review.
<h4>Background</h4>The Nuremberg code defines the general ethical framework of medical research with participant consent as its cornerstone. In cluster randomized trials (CRT), obtaining participant informed consent raises logistic and methodologic concerns. First, with randomization of...
Main Authors: | Bruno Giraudeau, Agnès Caille, Amélie Le Gouge, Philippe Ravaud |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22792319/pdf/?tool=EBI |
Similar Items
-
Preventing bias in cluster randomised trials.
by: Bruno Giraudeau, et al.
Published: (2009-05-01) -
Planning a cluster randomized trial with unequal cluster sizes: practical issues involving continuous outcomes
by: Ravaud Philippe, et al.
Published: (2006-04-01) -
<it>A priori </it>postulated and real power in cluster randomized trials: mind the gap
by: Giraudeau Bruno, et al.
Published: (2005-08-01) -
Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
by: Bruno Giraudeau, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic
by: Clémence Leyrat, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)