The intertexteme as an instrument in the past — pre­sent — future dialogical space of urbanism practices: an intersemiotic ana­ly­sis of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad

This paper discusses intertextual and intervisual tools for creating the past — present — future dialogic axis in urban practices, using the example of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad. The authors describe the urban space as an object of research, give a definition of the urban i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sładkiewicz Ż. R, Wielądek K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University 2020-02-01
Series:Слово.ру: балтийский акцент
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.kantiana.ru/slovo/4409/12987/
id doaj-4fb2a2ad1e0248cb9e8e7698a91591e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4fb2a2ad1e0248cb9e8e7698a91591e02020-11-25T03:47:56ZengImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityСлово.ру: балтийский акцент 2225-53462686-89892020-02-0111110813310.5922/2225-5346-2020-1-4The intertexteme as an instrument in the past — pre­sent — future dialogical space of urbanism practices: an intersemiotic ana­ly­sis of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and KaliningradSładkiewicz Ż. R 0Wielądek K. 1University of GdańskUniversity of GdańskThis paper discusses intertextual and intervisual tools for creating the past — present — future dialogic axis in urban practices, using the example of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad. The authors describe the urban space as an object of research, give a definition of the urban inscription, characterize the semiotic nature of the latter, consider ter­minology problems relating to the category of intertextuality, and broadly interpret the inter­texteme as a tool in the ‘past — present — future’ dialogical space in the urban narrative. The study relies on rich empirical material. In summing up the features of semantic formation in the narrative urban practices, the authors conclude that the urban inscription is a symbolical­ly organized space in which the interpreter deals with signs of various semiotic systems and employs cultural meanings and conventions expressed in both verbal and graphic forms. The recognizability of intertextemes in both authentic and modified forms contributes to the at­tractivity of the urban text and its dialogical nature.https://journals.kantiana.ru/slovo/4409/12987/intertextualityurban inscriptionsgraffititimelineurban space
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sładkiewicz Ż. R
Wielądek K.
spellingShingle Sładkiewicz Ż. R
Wielądek K.
The intertexteme as an instrument in the past — pre­sent — future dialogical space of urbanism practices: an intersemiotic ana­ly­sis of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad
Слово.ру: балтийский акцент
intertextuality
urban inscriptions
graffiti
timeline
urban space
author_facet Sładkiewicz Ż. R
Wielądek K.
author_sort Sładkiewicz Ż. R
title The intertexteme as an instrument in the past — pre­sent — future dialogical space of urbanism practices: an intersemiotic ana­ly­sis of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad
title_short The intertexteme as an instrument in the past — pre­sent — future dialogical space of urbanism practices: an intersemiotic ana­ly­sis of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad
title_full The intertexteme as an instrument in the past — pre­sent — future dialogical space of urbanism practices: an intersemiotic ana­ly­sis of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad
title_fullStr The intertexteme as an instrument in the past — pre­sent — future dialogical space of urbanism practices: an intersemiotic ana­ly­sis of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad
title_full_unstemmed The intertexteme as an instrument in the past — pre­sent — future dialogical space of urbanism practices: an intersemiotic ana­ly­sis of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad
title_sort intertexteme as an instrument in the past — pre­sent — future dialogical space of urbanism practices: an intersemiotic ana­ly­sis of graffiti and inscriptions in gdansk and kaliningrad
publisher Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
series Слово.ру: балтийский акцент
issn 2225-5346
2686-8989
publishDate 2020-02-01
description This paper discusses intertextual and intervisual tools for creating the past — present — future dialogic axis in urban practices, using the example of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad. The authors describe the urban space as an object of research, give a definition of the urban inscription, characterize the semiotic nature of the latter, consider ter­minology problems relating to the category of intertextuality, and broadly interpret the inter­texteme as a tool in the ‘past — present — future’ dialogical space in the urban narrative. The study relies on rich empirical material. In summing up the features of semantic formation in the narrative urban practices, the authors conclude that the urban inscription is a symbolical­ly organized space in which the interpreter deals with signs of various semiotic systems and employs cultural meanings and conventions expressed in both verbal and graphic forms. The recognizability of intertextemes in both authentic and modified forms contributes to the at­tractivity of the urban text and its dialogical nature.
topic intertextuality
urban inscriptions
graffiti
timeline
urban space
url https://journals.kantiana.ru/slovo/4409/12987/
work_keys_str_mv AT sładkiewiczzr theintertextemeasaninstrumentinthepastpresentfuturedialogicalspaceofurbanismpracticesanintersemioticanalysisofgraffitiandinscriptionsingdanskandkaliningrad
AT wieladekk theintertextemeasaninstrumentinthepastpresentfuturedialogicalspaceofurbanismpracticesanintersemioticanalysisofgraffitiandinscriptionsingdanskandkaliningrad
AT sładkiewiczzr intertextemeasaninstrumentinthepastpresentfuturedialogicalspaceofurbanismpracticesanintersemioticanalysisofgraffitiandinscriptionsingdanskandkaliningrad
AT wieladekk intertextemeasaninstrumentinthepastpresentfuturedialogicalspaceofurbanismpracticesanintersemioticanalysisofgraffitiandinscriptionsingdanskandkaliningrad
_version_ 1724501259543642112