A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind,...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
1996-01-01
|
Series: | Mediators of Inflammation |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935196000555 |
id |
doaj-4fb21dc819af40eaba5432e61aa9de99 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4fb21dc819af40eaba5432e61aa9de992020-11-24T22:36:42ZengHindawi LimitedMediators of Inflammation0962-93511466-18611996-01-015538238910.1155/S0962935196000555A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluationN. Ringdal0P. Swinburn1R. Backman2P. Plaschke3A. P. Sips4P. Kjaersgaard5G. Bratten6T. A. J. Harris7Molde County Hospital, NorwayMercy Specialist Centre, New ZealandMeltola Hospital, FinlandSahlgren's Hospital, SwedenThe Polikliniek Kanalweg, The NetherlandsGlaxo Wellcome AS, NorwayGlaxo Wellcome AS, NorwayInternational Medical Affairs, Glaxo Wellcome, UKIn Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 800 μg daily, administered as a powder via the Diskhaler®, and budesonide (BUD) 1600 μg daily, administered using the Turbuhaler®, in adult patients with moderate-tosevere asthma. A total of 518 patients participated in the study, 256 of whom received FP and 262 BUD. Assessment of mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the 12-week treatment period revealed a statistically significant difference in efficacy between FP 800 μg daily and BUD 1600 μg daily in favour of FP (p = 0.003), with an overall improvement of 20.9 l/min with FP compared with 12.4 l/min on BUD. Statistically significant differences in favour of FP were seen over the 12 weeks for mean evening PEF (p = 0.04), diurnal PEF variation (p = 0.03) and percentage predicted PEF (p = 0.003), as well as forced expiratory volume (p = 0.008), forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and PEF (p = 0.005) measured at clinic visits. The median percentage of symptom-free nights increased over the 12-week study period in both treatment groups, with similar changes seen for the median percentage of days with symptom score < 2, rescue medication use and exacerbations of asthma. The incidence of adverse events was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups. The geometric mean ratios of serum cortisol levels were found to be 1.03 for FP, indicating no mean hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from baseline, and 0.93 for BUD (p = 0.0002 compared with FP). In summary, FP 800 μg daily showed a greater efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma than BUD 1600 μg daily.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935196000555 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
N. Ringdal P. Swinburn R. Backman P. Plaschke A. P. Sips P. Kjaersgaard G. Bratten T. A. J. Harris |
spellingShingle |
N. Ringdal P. Swinburn R. Backman P. Plaschke A. P. Sips P. Kjaersgaard G. Bratten T. A. J. Harris A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation Mediators of Inflammation |
author_facet |
N. Ringdal P. Swinburn R. Backman P. Plaschke A. P. Sips P. Kjaersgaard G. Bratten T. A. J. Harris |
author_sort |
N. Ringdal |
title |
A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation |
title_short |
A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation |
title_full |
A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation |
title_fullStr |
A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation |
title_sort |
blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Mediators of Inflammation |
issn |
0962-9351 1466-1861 |
publishDate |
1996-01-01 |
description |
In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 800 μg daily, administered as a powder via the Diskhaler®, and budesonide (BUD) 1600 μg daily, administered using the Turbuhaler®, in adult patients with moderate-tosevere asthma. A total of 518 patients participated in the study, 256 of whom received FP and 262 BUD. Assessment of mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the 12-week treatment period revealed a statistically significant difference in efficacy between FP 800 μg daily and BUD 1600 μg daily in favour of FP (p = 0.003), with an overall improvement of 20.9 l/min with FP compared with 12.4 l/min on BUD. Statistically significant differences in favour of FP were seen over the 12 weeks for mean evening PEF (p = 0.04), diurnal PEF variation (p = 0.03) and percentage predicted PEF (p = 0.003), as well as forced expiratory volume (p = 0.008), forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and PEF (p = 0.005) measured at clinic visits. The median percentage of symptom-free nights increased over the 12-week study period in both treatment groups, with similar changes seen for the median percentage of days with symptom score < 2, rescue medication use and exacerbations of asthma. The incidence of adverse events was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups. The geometric mean ratios of serum cortisol levels were found to be 1.03 for FP, indicating no mean hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from baseline, and 0.93 for BUD (p = 0.0002 compared with FP). In summary, FP 800 μg daily showed a greater efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma than BUD 1600 μg daily. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935196000555 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nringdal ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT pswinburn ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT rbackman ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT pplaschke ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT apsips ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT pkjaersgaard ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT gbratten ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT tajharris ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT nringdal blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT pswinburn blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT rbackman blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT pplaschke blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT apsips blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT pkjaersgaard blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT gbratten blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation AT tajharris blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation |
_version_ |
1725718581667168256 |