A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation

In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Ringdal, P. Swinburn, R. Backman, P. Plaschke, A. P. Sips, P. Kjaersgaard, G. Bratten, T. A. J. Harris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 1996-01-01
Series:Mediators of Inflammation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935196000555
id doaj-4fb21dc819af40eaba5432e61aa9de99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4fb21dc819af40eaba5432e61aa9de992020-11-24T22:36:42ZengHindawi LimitedMediators of Inflammation0962-93511466-18611996-01-015538238910.1155/S0962935196000555A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluationN. Ringdal0P. Swinburn1R. Backman2P. Plaschke3A. P. Sips4P. Kjaersgaard5G. Bratten6T. A. J. Harris7Molde County Hospital, NorwayMercy Specialist Centre, New ZealandMeltola Hospital, FinlandSahlgren's Hospital, SwedenThe Polikliniek Kanalweg, The NetherlandsGlaxo Wellcome AS, NorwayGlaxo Wellcome AS, NorwayInternational Medical Affairs, Glaxo Wellcome, UKIn Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 800 μg daily, administered as a powder via the Diskhaler®, and budesonide (BUD) 1600 μg daily, administered using the Turbuhaler®, in adult patients with moderate-tosevere asthma. A total of 518 patients participated in the study, 256 of whom received FP and 262 BUD. Assessment of mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the 12-week treatment period revealed a statistically significant difference in efficacy between FP 800 μg daily and BUD 1600 μg daily in favour of FP (p = 0.003), with an overall improvement of 20.9 l/min with FP compared with 12.4 l/min on BUD. Statistically significant differences in favour of FP were seen over the 12 weeks for mean evening PEF (p = 0.04), diurnal PEF variation (p = 0.03) and percentage predicted PEF (p = 0.003), as well as forced expiratory volume (p = 0.008), forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and PEF (p = 0.005) measured at clinic visits. The median percentage of symptom-free nights increased over the 12-week study period in both treatment groups, with similar changes seen for the median percentage of days with symptom score < 2, rescue medication use and exacerbations of asthma. The incidence of adverse events was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups. The geometric mean ratios of serum cortisol levels were found to be 1.03 for FP, indicating no mean hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from baseline, and 0.93 for BUD (p = 0.0002 compared with FP). In summary, FP 800 μg daily showed a greater efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma than BUD 1600 μg daily.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935196000555
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. Ringdal
P. Swinburn
R. Backman
P. Plaschke
A. P. Sips
P. Kjaersgaard
G. Bratten
T. A. J. Harris
spellingShingle N. Ringdal
P. Swinburn
R. Backman
P. Plaschke
A. P. Sips
P. Kjaersgaard
G. Bratten
T. A. J. Harris
A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
Mediators of Inflammation
author_facet N. Ringdal
P. Swinburn
R. Backman
P. Plaschke
A. P. Sips
P. Kjaersgaard
G. Bratten
T. A. J. Harris
author_sort N. Ringdal
title A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title_short A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title_full A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title_fullStr A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title_sort blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mediators of Inflammation
issn 0962-9351
1466-1861
publishDate 1996-01-01
description In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 800 μg daily, administered as a powder via the Diskhaler®, and budesonide (BUD) 1600 μg daily, administered using the Turbuhaler®, in adult patients with moderate-tosevere asthma. A total of 518 patients participated in the study, 256 of whom received FP and 262 BUD. Assessment of mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the 12-week treatment period revealed a statistically significant difference in efficacy between FP 800 μg daily and BUD 1600 μg daily in favour of FP (p = 0.003), with an overall improvement of 20.9 l/min with FP compared with 12.4 l/min on BUD. Statistically significant differences in favour of FP were seen over the 12 weeks for mean evening PEF (p = 0.04), diurnal PEF variation (p = 0.03) and percentage predicted PEF (p = 0.003), as well as forced expiratory volume (p = 0.008), forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and PEF (p = 0.005) measured at clinic visits. The median percentage of symptom-free nights increased over the 12-week study period in both treatment groups, with similar changes seen for the median percentage of days with symptom score < 2, rescue medication use and exacerbations of asthma. The incidence of adverse events was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups. The geometric mean ratios of serum cortisol levels were found to be 1.03 for FP, indicating no mean hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from baseline, and 0.93 for BUD (p = 0.0002 compared with FP). In summary, FP 800 μg daily showed a greater efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma than BUD 1600 μg daily.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935196000555
work_keys_str_mv AT nringdal ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT pswinburn ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT rbackman ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT pplaschke ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT apsips ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT pkjaersgaard ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT gbratten ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT tajharris ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT nringdal blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT pswinburn blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT rbackman blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT pplaschke blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT apsips blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT pkjaersgaard blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT gbratten blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT tajharris blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
_version_ 1725718581667168256