Statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effects

Abstract Background Social genetic effects (SGE) are the effects of the genotype of one animal on the phenotypes of other animals within a social group. Because SGE contribute to variation in economically important traits for pigs, the inclusion of SGE in statistical models could increase responses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thinh Tuan Chu, Mark Henryon, Just Jensen, Birgitte Ask, Ole Fredslund Christensen
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:Genetics Selection Evolution
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-020-00598-8
id doaj-4f8c6a6966824192a7c18881b00b84a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f8c6a6966824192a7c18881b00b84a62021-01-10T12:29:24ZdeuBMCGenetics Selection Evolution1297-96862021-01-0153111610.1186/s12711-020-00598-8Statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effectsThinh Tuan Chu0Mark Henryon1Just Jensen2Birgitte Ask3Ole Fredslund Christensen4Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus UniversityDanish Pig Research Centre, SEGESCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus UniversityDanish Pig Research Centre, SEGESCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus UniversityAbstract Background Social genetic effects (SGE) are the effects of the genotype of one animal on the phenotypes of other animals within a social group. Because SGE contribute to variation in economically important traits for pigs, the inclusion of SGE in statistical models could increase responses to selection (RS) in breeding programs. In such models, increasing the relatedness of members within groups further increases RS when using pedigree-based relationships; however, this has not been demonstrated with genomic-based relationships or with a constraint on inbreeding. In this study, we compared the use of statistical models with and without SGE and compared groups composed at random versus groups composed of families in genomic selection breeding programs with a constraint on the rate of inbreeding. Results When SGE were of a moderate magnitude, inclusion of SGE in the statistical model substantially increased RS when SGE were considered for selection. However, when SGE were included in the model but not considered for selection, the increase in RS and in accuracy of predicted direct genetic effects (DGE) depended on the correlation between SGE and DGE. When SGE were of a low magnitude, inclusion of SGE in the model did not increase RS, probably because of the poor separation of effects and convergence issues of the algorithms. Compared to a random group composition design, groups composed of families led to higher RS. The difference in RS between the two group compositions was slightly reduced when using genomic-based compared to pedigree-based relationships. Conclusions The use of a statistical model that includes SGE can substantially improve response to selection at a fixed rate of inbreeding, because it allows the heritable variation from SGE to be accounted for and capitalized on. Compared to having random groups, family groups result in greater response to selection in the presence of SGE but the advantage of using family groups decreases when genomic-based relationships are used.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-020-00598-8
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thinh Tuan Chu
Mark Henryon
Just Jensen
Birgitte Ask
Ole Fredslund Christensen
spellingShingle Thinh Tuan Chu
Mark Henryon
Just Jensen
Birgitte Ask
Ole Fredslund Christensen
Statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effects
Genetics Selection Evolution
author_facet Thinh Tuan Chu
Mark Henryon
Just Jensen
Birgitte Ask
Ole Fredslund Christensen
author_sort Thinh Tuan Chu
title Statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effects
title_short Statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effects
title_full Statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effects
title_fullStr Statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effects
title_full_unstemmed Statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effects
title_sort statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effects
publisher BMC
series Genetics Selection Evolution
issn 1297-9686
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Background Social genetic effects (SGE) are the effects of the genotype of one animal on the phenotypes of other animals within a social group. Because SGE contribute to variation in economically important traits for pigs, the inclusion of SGE in statistical models could increase responses to selection (RS) in breeding programs. In such models, increasing the relatedness of members within groups further increases RS when using pedigree-based relationships; however, this has not been demonstrated with genomic-based relationships or with a constraint on inbreeding. In this study, we compared the use of statistical models with and without SGE and compared groups composed at random versus groups composed of families in genomic selection breeding programs with a constraint on the rate of inbreeding. Results When SGE were of a moderate magnitude, inclusion of SGE in the statistical model substantially increased RS when SGE were considered for selection. However, when SGE were included in the model but not considered for selection, the increase in RS and in accuracy of predicted direct genetic effects (DGE) depended on the correlation between SGE and DGE. When SGE were of a low magnitude, inclusion of SGE in the model did not increase RS, probably because of the poor separation of effects and convergence issues of the algorithms. Compared to a random group composition design, groups composed of families led to higher RS. The difference in RS between the two group compositions was slightly reduced when using genomic-based compared to pedigree-based relationships. Conclusions The use of a statistical model that includes SGE can substantially improve response to selection at a fixed rate of inbreeding, because it allows the heritable variation from SGE to be accounted for and capitalized on. Compared to having random groups, family groups result in greater response to selection in the presence of SGE but the advantage of using family groups decreases when genomic-based relationships are used.
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-020-00598-8
work_keys_str_mv AT thinhtuanchu statisticalmodelandtestingdesignstoincreaseresponsetoselectionwithconstrainedinbreedingingenomicbreedingprogramsforpigsaffectedbysocialgeneticeffects
AT markhenryon statisticalmodelandtestingdesignstoincreaseresponsetoselectionwithconstrainedinbreedingingenomicbreedingprogramsforpigsaffectedbysocialgeneticeffects
AT justjensen statisticalmodelandtestingdesignstoincreaseresponsetoselectionwithconstrainedinbreedingingenomicbreedingprogramsforpigsaffectedbysocialgeneticeffects
AT birgitteask statisticalmodelandtestingdesignstoincreaseresponsetoselectionwithconstrainedinbreedingingenomicbreedingprogramsforpigsaffectedbysocialgeneticeffects
AT olefredslundchristensen statisticalmodelandtestingdesignstoincreaseresponsetoselectionwithconstrainedinbreedingingenomicbreedingprogramsforpigsaffectedbysocialgeneticeffects
_version_ 1724342773328379904