Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance.

Having secrets is incredibly common. However, secrecy has only recently started to receive more attention in research. What has largely been neglected so far are the consequences of secret-sharing for the relationship between sharer and receiver. In this project, we aim to fill this gap. Previous re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariela E Jaffé, Maria Douneva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233953
id doaj-4f8c2a7e35a64748ab83b613e2667d4b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f8c2a7e35a64748ab83b613e2667d4b2021-06-19T05:09:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023395310.1371/journal.pone.0233953Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance.Mariela E JafféMaria DounevaHaving secrets is incredibly common. However, secrecy has only recently started to receive more attention in research. What has largely been neglected so far are the consequences of secret-sharing for the relationship between sharer and receiver. In this project, we aim to fill this gap. Previous research has shown that closeness can make secret-sharing more likely. Building on research from the self-disclosure and relationship literature, we experimentally investigate whether secret-sharing might in turn increase perceptions of closeness. In addition, we test the valence of the secrets shared as potential driver of the hypothesized effect, as negative secrets might signal a high level of trust, but might also present a burden to the receiver. To provide a holistic picture, we build on a variety of methods to investigate three perspectives: Study 1 focuses on the receiver and tests whether another person sharing secrets (vs. nonconfidential information) decreases distance in the eyes of the receiver. Study 2 investigates lay theories and tests how an observer perceives the relationship between two people who share secrets (vs. nonconfidential information). Study 3 tests whether these lay theories about sharing secrets are predictive of behavior, and how a sharer might choose secrets of negative or positive valence to decrease perceived distance on the receiver's side. Our results will contribute to the understanding of how sharing secrets affects the way individuals think about each other, how close they feel to each other, and how they interact with each other.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233953
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariela E Jaffé
Maria Douneva
spellingShingle Mariela E Jaffé
Maria Douneva
Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mariela E Jaffé
Maria Douneva
author_sort Mariela E Jaffé
title Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance.
title_short Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance.
title_full Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance.
title_fullStr Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance.
title_full_unstemmed Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance.
title_sort secretive and close? how sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Having secrets is incredibly common. However, secrecy has only recently started to receive more attention in research. What has largely been neglected so far are the consequences of secret-sharing for the relationship between sharer and receiver. In this project, we aim to fill this gap. Previous research has shown that closeness can make secret-sharing more likely. Building on research from the self-disclosure and relationship literature, we experimentally investigate whether secret-sharing might in turn increase perceptions of closeness. In addition, we test the valence of the secrets shared as potential driver of the hypothesized effect, as negative secrets might signal a high level of trust, but might also present a burden to the receiver. To provide a holistic picture, we build on a variety of methods to investigate three perspectives: Study 1 focuses on the receiver and tests whether another person sharing secrets (vs. nonconfidential information) decreases distance in the eyes of the receiver. Study 2 investigates lay theories and tests how an observer perceives the relationship between two people who share secrets (vs. nonconfidential information). Study 3 tests whether these lay theories about sharing secrets are predictive of behavior, and how a sharer might choose secrets of negative or positive valence to decrease perceived distance on the receiver's side. Our results will contribute to the understanding of how sharing secrets affects the way individuals think about each other, how close they feel to each other, and how they interact with each other.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233953
work_keys_str_mv AT marielaejaffe secretiveandclosehowsharingsecretsmayimpactperceptionsofdistance
AT mariadouneva secretiveandclosehowsharingsecretsmayimpactperceptionsofdistance
_version_ 1721371356774268928