The work pattern of personal care workers in two Australian nursing homes: a time-motion study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of the study is to describe the work pattern of personal care workers (PCWs) in nursing homes. This knowledge is important for staff performance appraisal, task allocation and scheduling. It will also support funding allocati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qian Si-Yu, Yu Ping, Zhang Zhen-Yu, Hailey David M, Davy Pamela J, Nelson Mark I
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-09-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/305
id doaj-4f86b708e5274aae905087eb442c76c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f86b708e5274aae905087eb442c76c82020-11-24T22:30:35ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632012-09-0112130510.1186/1472-6963-12-305The work pattern of personal care workers in two Australian nursing homes: a time-motion studyQian Si-YuYu PingZhang Zhen-YuHailey David MDavy Pamela JNelson Mark I<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of the study is to describe the work pattern of personal care workers (PCWs) in nursing homes. This knowledge is important for staff performance appraisal, task allocation and scheduling. It will also support funding allocation based on activities.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A time-motion study was conducted in 2010 at two Australian nursing homes. The observation at Site 1 was between the hours of 7:00 and 14:00 or 15:00 for 14 days. One PCW was observed on each day. The observation at Site 2 was from 10:00 to 17:00 for 16 days. One PCW working on a morning shift and another one working on an afternoon shift were observed on each day. Fifty-eight work activities done by PCWs were grouped into eight categories. Activity time, frequency, duration and the switch between two consecutive activities were used as measurements to describe the work pattern.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Personal care workers spent about 70.0% of their time on four types of activities consistently at both sites: direct care (30.7%), indirect care (17.6%), infection control (6.4%) and staff break (15.2%). Oral communication was the most frequently observed activity. It could occur independently or concurrently with other activities. At Site 2, PCWs spent significantly more time than their counterparts at Site 1 on oral communication (Site 1: 47.3% vs. Site 2: 63.5%, P = 0.003), transit (Site 1: 3.4% vs. Site 2: 5.5%, P < 0.001) and others (Site 1: 0.5% vs. Site 2: 1.8%, P < 0.001). They spent less time on documentation (Site 1: 4.1% vs. Site 2: 2.3%, P < 0.001). More than two-thirds of the observed activities had a very short duration (1 minute or less). Personal care workers frequently switched within or between oral communication, direct and indirect care activities.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>At both nursing homes, direct care, indirect care, infection control and staff break occupied the major part of a PCW’s work, however oral communication was the most time consuming activity. Personal care workers frequently switched between activities, suggesting that looking after the elderly in nursing homes is a busy and demanding job.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/305
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qian Si-Yu
Yu Ping
Zhang Zhen-Yu
Hailey David M
Davy Pamela J
Nelson Mark I
spellingShingle Qian Si-Yu
Yu Ping
Zhang Zhen-Yu
Hailey David M
Davy Pamela J
Nelson Mark I
The work pattern of personal care workers in two Australian nursing homes: a time-motion study
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Qian Si-Yu
Yu Ping
Zhang Zhen-Yu
Hailey David M
Davy Pamela J
Nelson Mark I
author_sort Qian Si-Yu
title The work pattern of personal care workers in two Australian nursing homes: a time-motion study
title_short The work pattern of personal care workers in two Australian nursing homes: a time-motion study
title_full The work pattern of personal care workers in two Australian nursing homes: a time-motion study
title_fullStr The work pattern of personal care workers in two Australian nursing homes: a time-motion study
title_full_unstemmed The work pattern of personal care workers in two Australian nursing homes: a time-motion study
title_sort work pattern of personal care workers in two australian nursing homes: a time-motion study
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2012-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of the study is to describe the work pattern of personal care workers (PCWs) in nursing homes. This knowledge is important for staff performance appraisal, task allocation and scheduling. It will also support funding allocation based on activities.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A time-motion study was conducted in 2010 at two Australian nursing homes. The observation at Site 1 was between the hours of 7:00 and 14:00 or 15:00 for 14 days. One PCW was observed on each day. The observation at Site 2 was from 10:00 to 17:00 for 16 days. One PCW working on a morning shift and another one working on an afternoon shift were observed on each day. Fifty-eight work activities done by PCWs were grouped into eight categories. Activity time, frequency, duration and the switch between two consecutive activities were used as measurements to describe the work pattern.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Personal care workers spent about 70.0% of their time on four types of activities consistently at both sites: direct care (30.7%), indirect care (17.6%), infection control (6.4%) and staff break (15.2%). Oral communication was the most frequently observed activity. It could occur independently or concurrently with other activities. At Site 2, PCWs spent significantly more time than their counterparts at Site 1 on oral communication (Site 1: 47.3% vs. Site 2: 63.5%, P = 0.003), transit (Site 1: 3.4% vs. Site 2: 5.5%, P < 0.001) and others (Site 1: 0.5% vs. Site 2: 1.8%, P < 0.001). They spent less time on documentation (Site 1: 4.1% vs. Site 2: 2.3%, P < 0.001). More than two-thirds of the observed activities had a very short duration (1 minute or less). Personal care workers frequently switched within or between oral communication, direct and indirect care activities.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>At both nursing homes, direct care, indirect care, infection control and staff break occupied the major part of a PCW’s work, however oral communication was the most time consuming activity. Personal care workers frequently switched between activities, suggesting that looking after the elderly in nursing homes is a busy and demanding job.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/305
work_keys_str_mv AT qiansiyu theworkpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT yuping theworkpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT zhangzhenyu theworkpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT haileydavidm theworkpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT davypamelaj theworkpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT nelsonmarki theworkpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT qiansiyu workpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT yuping workpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT zhangzhenyu workpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT haileydavidm workpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT davypamelaj workpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
AT nelsonmarki workpatternofpersonalcareworkersintwoaustraliannursinghomesatimemotionstudy
_version_ 1725740280861163520