Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under Spinal Anaesthesia vs. General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomised Study
Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is conventionally performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in our institution. There are multiple studies which have found spinal anaesthesia as a safe alternative. We have conducted this study of LC, performed under spinal anesthesia to assess its...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2014-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/4700/9829_CE(Ra)_F(Sh)_PF1(SNAK)_PFA(P).pdf |
Summary: | Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is conventionally performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in our
institution. There are multiple studies which have found spinal
anaesthesia as a safe alternative. We have conducted this study
of LC, performed under spinal anesthesia to assess its safety
and feasibility in comparison with GA.
Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with symptomatic
gallstone disease and American Society of Anesthesiologists
status I or II were randomised to have LC under spinal (n = 25) or
general (n = 25) anesthesia. Intraoperative vitals, postoperative
pain, complications, recovery, and surgeon satisfaction were
compared between the 2 groups.
Results: In the SA group six patients (24%) complained of
shoulder pain, two patients required conversion to GA (8%) as
the pain did not subside with Fentanyl. None of the patients in
the SA group had immediate postoperative pain at operated
site. Only two (8%) patients had pain score of 4 at the operative
site within eight hours requiring rescue analgesic. One patient
had nausea but no vomiting (4%). All the patients (100%) in the
GA group had pain at operated site immediately after surgery
and their pain score ranged from 4-7, all patients received
rescue analgesic before shifting to the ward. In the first 24h
tramadol required as rescue in the GA group was 82±24 mg
which was significantly higher than the SA group requiring
only 30±33.16 mg. Although, the GA group had more patients
experiencing postoperative nausea & vomiting it was not
statistically significant.
Conclusion: SA as the sole anaesthesia technique is feasible,
safe and cost effective for elective LC. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2249-782X 0973-709X |