Investigating errors in medical imaging: medical malpractice cases in Finland

• Main Authors: Tarja Tarkiainen, Miia Turpeinen, Marianne Haapea, Esa Liukkonen, Jaakko Niinimäki
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SpringerOpen 2021-06-01
• Series: Insights into Imaging
• Subjects: Safety error; Incident reporting; Adverse events; Patient injury claim
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01011-8

Abstract Objective The objectives of the study were to survey patient injury claims concerning medical imaging in Finland in 1991–2017, and to investigate the nature of the incidents, the number of claims, the reasons for the claims, and the decisions made concerning the claims. Materials and methods The research material consisted of patient claims concerning imaging, sent to the Finnish Patient Insurance Centre (PVK). The data contained information on injury dates, the examination code, the decision code, the description of the injury, and the medical grounds for decisions. Results The number of claims included in the study was 1054, and the average number per year was 87. The most common cause was delayed diagnosis (404 claims, 38.3%). Most of the claims concerned mammography (314, 29.8%), radiography (170, 16.1%), and MRI (162, 15.4%). According to the decisions made by the PVK, there were no delays in 54.6% of the examinations for which claims were made. About 30% of all patient claims received compensation, the most typical reason being medical malpractice (27.7%), followed by excessive injuries and injuries caused by infections, accidents and equipment (2.7%). Conclusion Patient injury in imaging examinations and interventions cannot be completely prevented. However, injury data are an important source of information for health care. By analysing claims, we can prevent harm, increase the quality of care, and improve patient safety in medical imaging.