Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potentials training study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Tone languages such as Thai and Mandarin Chinese use differences in fundamental frequency (F<sub>0</sub>, pitch) to distinguish lexical meaning. Previous behavioral studies have shown that native speakers of a non-tone la...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bao Mingzhen, Barkley Christopher M, Kaan Edith, Wayland Ratree
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-06-01
Series:BMC Neuroscience
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/53
id doaj-4f733674e9a9401fa55bf9730ddbc155
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f733674e9a9401fa55bf9730ddbc1552020-11-25T00:20:20ZengBMCBMC Neuroscience1471-22022008-06-01915310.1186/1471-2202-9-53Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potentials training studyBao MingzhenBarkley Christopher MKaan EdithWayland Ratree<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Tone languages such as Thai and Mandarin Chinese use differences in fundamental frequency (F<sub>0</sub>, pitch) to distinguish lexical meaning. Previous behavioral studies have shown that native speakers of a non-tone language have difficulty discriminating among tone contrasts and are sensitive to different F<sub>0 </sub>dimensions than speakers of a tone language. The aim of the present ERP study was to investigate the effect of language background and training on the non-attentive processing of lexical tones. EEG was recorded from 12 adult native speakers of Mandarin Chinese, 12 native speakers of American English, and 11 Thai speakers while they were watching a movie and were presented with multiple tokens of low-falling, mid-level and high-rising Thai lexical tones. High-rising or low-falling tokens were presented as deviants among mid-level standard tokens, and vice versa. EEG data and data from a behavioral discrimination task were collected before and after a two-day perceptual categorization training task.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Behavioral discrimination improved after training in both the Chinese and the English groups. Low-falling tone deviants versus standards elicited a mismatch negativity (MMN) in all language groups. Before, but not after training, the English speakers showed a larger MMN compared to the Chinese, even though English speakers performed worst in the behavioral tasks. The MMN was followed by a late negativity, which became smaller with improved discrimination. The High-rising deviants versus standards elicited a late negativity, which was left-lateralized only in the English and Chinese groups.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Results showed that native speakers of English, Chinese and Thai recruited largely similar mechanisms when non-attentively processing Thai lexical tones. However, native Thai speakers differed from the Chinese and English speakers with respect to the processing of late F<sub>0 </sub>contour differences (high-rising versus mid-level tones). In addition, native speakers of a non-tone language (English) were initially more sensitive to F<sub>0 </sub>onset differences (low-falling versus mid-level contrast), which was suppressed as a result of training. This result converges with results from previous behavioral studies and supports the view that attentive as well as non-attentive processing of F<sub>0 </sub>contrasts is affected by language background, but is malleable even in adult learners.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/53
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bao Mingzhen
Barkley Christopher M
Kaan Edith
Wayland Ratree
spellingShingle Bao Mingzhen
Barkley Christopher M
Kaan Edith
Wayland Ratree
Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potentials training study
BMC Neuroscience
author_facet Bao Mingzhen
Barkley Christopher M
Kaan Edith
Wayland Ratree
author_sort Bao Mingzhen
title Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potentials training study
title_short Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potentials training study
title_full Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potentials training study
title_fullStr Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potentials training study
title_full_unstemmed Thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of Thai, English and Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potentials training study
title_sort thai lexical tone perception in native speakers of thai, english and mandarin chinese: an event-related potentials training study
publisher BMC
series BMC Neuroscience
issn 1471-2202
publishDate 2008-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Tone languages such as Thai and Mandarin Chinese use differences in fundamental frequency (F<sub>0</sub>, pitch) to distinguish lexical meaning. Previous behavioral studies have shown that native speakers of a non-tone language have difficulty discriminating among tone contrasts and are sensitive to different F<sub>0 </sub>dimensions than speakers of a tone language. The aim of the present ERP study was to investigate the effect of language background and training on the non-attentive processing of lexical tones. EEG was recorded from 12 adult native speakers of Mandarin Chinese, 12 native speakers of American English, and 11 Thai speakers while they were watching a movie and were presented with multiple tokens of low-falling, mid-level and high-rising Thai lexical tones. High-rising or low-falling tokens were presented as deviants among mid-level standard tokens, and vice versa. EEG data and data from a behavioral discrimination task were collected before and after a two-day perceptual categorization training task.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Behavioral discrimination improved after training in both the Chinese and the English groups. Low-falling tone deviants versus standards elicited a mismatch negativity (MMN) in all language groups. Before, but not after training, the English speakers showed a larger MMN compared to the Chinese, even though English speakers performed worst in the behavioral tasks. The MMN was followed by a late negativity, which became smaller with improved discrimination. The High-rising deviants versus standards elicited a late negativity, which was left-lateralized only in the English and Chinese groups.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Results showed that native speakers of English, Chinese and Thai recruited largely similar mechanisms when non-attentively processing Thai lexical tones. However, native Thai speakers differed from the Chinese and English speakers with respect to the processing of late F<sub>0 </sub>contour differences (high-rising versus mid-level tones). In addition, native speakers of a non-tone language (English) were initially more sensitive to F<sub>0 </sub>onset differences (low-falling versus mid-level contrast), which was suppressed as a result of training. This result converges with results from previous behavioral studies and supports the view that attentive as well as non-attentive processing of F<sub>0 </sub>contrasts is affected by language background, but is malleable even in adult learners.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/53
work_keys_str_mv AT baomingzhen thailexicaltoneperceptioninnativespeakersofthaienglishandmandarinchineseaneventrelatedpotentialstrainingstudy
AT barkleychristopherm thailexicaltoneperceptioninnativespeakersofthaienglishandmandarinchineseaneventrelatedpotentialstrainingstudy
AT kaanedith thailexicaltoneperceptioninnativespeakersofthaienglishandmandarinchineseaneventrelatedpotentialstrainingstudy
AT waylandratree thailexicaltoneperceptioninnativespeakersofthaienglishandmandarinchineseaneventrelatedpotentialstrainingstudy
_version_ 1725368412089090048