Comment on “Channel flow, tectonic overpressure, and exhumation of high-pressure rocks in the Greater Himalayas” by Marques et al. (2018)

• Main Author: J. P. Platt
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-02-01
• Series: Solid Earth
• Online Access: https://www.solid-earth.net/10/357/2019/se-10-357-2019.pdf

<p>The upward-tapering channel model proposed by Marques et al. (2018) for the Himalayas has a “base” that forms part of the subducting footwall and therefore does not close the channel. This configuration does not produce return flow, and no dynamic overpressure develops in the channel. The geometrical and kinematic configuration they actually use for their calculations differs from this and is both geologically and mechanically improbable. In addition, the fixed upper boundary condition in their models is mechanically unrealistic and inconsistent with geological and geophysical constraints from the Himalayan orogen. In reality, the dynamic pressures calculated from their model, which exceed lithostatic pressure by as much as 1.5&thinsp;GPa, would cause elastic flexure or permanent deformation of the upper plate. I estimate that a flexural upwarp of 50&thinsp;km of the upper plate would be required to balance forces, which would lead to geologically unrealistic topographic and gravity anomalies. The magnitude of the dynamic overpressure that could be confined is in fact limited by the shear strength of the upper plate in the Himalayas, which is likely to be &lt;&thinsp;120&thinsp;MPa.</p>