HTA – Algorithm or Process?; Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”
Daniels, Porteny and Urrutia et al make a good case for the idea that that public decisions ought to be made not only “in the light of ” evidence but also “on the basis of ” budget impact, financial protection and equity. Health technology assessment (HTA) should, they say, be accordingly expanded...
Main Author: | Anthony J. Culyer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2016-08-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3203_97b9c7ff92a3846b058f14facf360f34.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Expanded HTA, Legitimacy and Independence; Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”
by: Keith Syrett
Published: (2016-09-01) -
Expanding HTA – Correcting a Misattribution, Clarifying the Scope of HTA and CEA; Comment on “Ethics in HTA: Examining the ‘Need for Expansion’”
by: Anthony J. Culyer
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy
by: Norman Daniels, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice; Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”
by: Maarten P. Jansen, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Beyond the Black Box Approach to Ethics! Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”
by: Lars Sandman, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01)